The Respondent is Логовський Владислав Андрійович, Logovskij Vladislav, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Domain Name”) is registered with Hosting Ukraine LLC (ua.ukraine) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-07-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Maya Lal, IBM HADOOP, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Third, the Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
In particular, the Respondent was well aware of the Complainant’s well-known IBM Trademark at the time it
registered the disputed domain name, as the IBM Trademark predates the disputed domain name for several
decades. ...
2024-07-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is 魏建东 (JianDong Wei), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The Disputed Domain Name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with
Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the Disputed Domain Name. Accordingly, the Disputed Domain
Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-05-31 - Case Details
The Respondent is ABBLES ABBLES, ABBLES, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Amazon Registrar, Inc. ...Further, the use of
the disputed domain name for the fraudulent website, as well as documented case of fraud associated with
the disputed domain name, clearly indicates the use of the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2024-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Демьян Шинкаренко, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Such use of the disputed
domain name cannot be regarded as a legitimate activity giving rise to rights or legitimate interests in the
disputed domain name.
...
2023-01-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Climb First Consultancy Pvt Ltd, Borivali (West), Mumbai, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...It is well established in cases under the Policy that the addition of one or more generic words to a trademark in a domain name does not prevent the domain name from creating a likelihood of confusion. Such elements cannot remove the overall impression made on the public by the trademark, which in the present case is the dominant element of the disputed domain name (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. ...
2013-09-26 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent is referred to by customers and suppliers by the disputed domain name and has evolved to become recognized by the disputed domain name and/or by a name to which the disputed domain name is reasonably referable.
...
2013-03-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Nick Kett, UK.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1&1 IONOS S.E. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2020-03-05 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for transfer of
the disputed domain name.
Notably, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical and/or confusingly similar to
the Trade Mark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests with respect to the disputed domain
page 3
name, and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...The Panel finds the entirety of the Trade Mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly,
based on its review of the specific Trade Mark and domain name at issue in this matter, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-10-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is illuminati zone, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Hostinger Operations, UAB (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-03-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Curtis Smith, United Kingdom, represented by Dmitriy Chyrkin, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Rules define Reverse Domain Name Hijacking as “using the UDRP in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name”.
...
2021-03-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is om jee, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DotPH (the “Registry”).
3. ...In addition, the Complainant uses amongst others the domain name for its official
website.
The disputed domain name was registered on June 15, 2024. ...
2025-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Liana Frasineanu, WIZIUP AND CO SRL, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with 1API GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is 石磊 (Lei Shi), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital
Technology Co., Ltd. ...It also offered for sale of the disputed domain
name for valuable consideration in excess of the Respondent’s documented out-of-pocket costs
directly related to the disputed domain name. ...
2024-09-02 - Case Details
The Complainant’s predecessor in title registered the domain name on December 4, 2017 and registered the domain name on December 13, 2018.
...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark; the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2022-04-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is E. Saldanha, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the ONEY trademark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is identical to the ONEY trademark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-04-25 - Case Details
The Center thereafter verified that the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent on June 22, 2017, registered the disputed domain name using a privacy protection service. The disputed domain name resolves to the “St. ...
2017-11-27 - Case Details
Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on September 12,
2023 relating only to the disputed domain name (the “First Disputed Domain Name”). On
September 12, 2023, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in
connection with the First Disputed Domain Name . ...The Center verified that the First Amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-12-01 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...Further, it is well established in decisions under the UDRP that the generic Top-Level Domain (e.g., ".com", ".info", ".net", ".org") may typically be disregarded for the purposes of consideration of confusing similarity between a trademark and a domain name.
...
2018-02-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Name Redacted1 and Chantal Humbert, Côte d'Ivoire.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name is registered with Combell NV.
...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-01-25 - Case Details