The Respondent is Ido Raviv, Net Games Inc. of West Byfleet, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“UK”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Since the Domain Name was registered after the registration of the Complainant’s trademark CASUMO and of the corresponding domain name the Complainant claims that the Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2014-05-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is SafeLogic, Paris, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2007-10-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Sergey Popov of Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OnlineNic, Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com.
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its XENICAL trademark. The disputed domain name incorporates the XENICAL trademark in its entirety. ...
2009-09-15 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaints satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainants’ request.
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
...
2024-01-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the .ir Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “irDRP”), the Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
“Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
“Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant also notes
that the Respondent’s re-direction of the disputed domain name to the Complainant’s official
website at the domain name after having received the Complainant’s cease and desist letter
and subsequent correspondence, should be considered neither as a bona fide offering of goods or services
nor as a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain names.
...
2022-07-27 - Case Details
The Respondent is Thomas Donald Stenzel, med2shop of Sunland Park, Arkansas, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Shinjiru MSC Sdn Bhd (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2015-08-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zhang Qiang of Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar or identical to the Trade Marks, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2015-12-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Regina Parrish, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (‘the Domain Name’) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent has not answered this Complaint and there is no evidence or reason to suggest the Respondent is, in fact, commonly known by the Domain Name.
The Domain Name has been used in a fraudulent email scheme. Further, the Domain Name has also been used for pay-per-click links to sites offering third party commercial goods and services. ...
2019-06-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is White Horse co,. Ltd, of Guang Dong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-10-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fundacion Private Whois of Panama, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Internet.bs Corp. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-10-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mary McBride, of Ontario, US Minor Outlying Islands, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-10-29 - Case Details
Respondent is Alexander Kravtsov of Khabarovskiy kray, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Bizcn.com, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-09-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kai Haavisto, Rolloglobal Ltd Suomen sivuliike of Lohja, Finland, and Rolloglobal Ltd of Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OVH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant alleges that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, in particular that the Respondent does not identify itself in business under the disputed domain name, and the Respondent is not making any legitimate use of the disputed domain name.
...
2018-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is SL Master, San Diego, California, of United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NIC-México.
3. ...b. That the Respondent has not used the disputed domain name or a name corresponding to the disputed domain name, in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2008-05-09 - Case Details
Jeffries, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NamesDirect.com.
3. ...Covert intended and intends to use the disputed domain name in the future. Thus the condition of ceasing to use the disputed domain name has not been met. ...
2007-07-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Y, P of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-01-29 - Case Details
The Respondents are Whois Privacy Service Pty Ltd of Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia and Domain Support of Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Fabulous.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...
2013-12-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Milen Radumilo of Bucharest, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-01-14 - Case Details
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, LLC.
...Moreover, the Panel notes that
website resolving from the “.org” disputed domain name previously provided a contact email address
associated with the “.com” disputed domain name (and that at some point after the filing of the Complaint
this email was changed to show the disputed domain name – i.e., from “.com” to “.org”). ...
2023-02-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...One Disputed Domain Name adds a typo in the
page 3
form of an extra “s” in the middle of the “sarepta” name. ...
2024-10-11 - Case Details