The Respondents are Zhou Shichun, China, and Huijing Li, China.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...page 2
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2024-06-03 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Complaint, Annex G.
Respondent registered the disputed domain name on January 19, 2012. The disputed domain name redirects to third-party web sites.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2019-01-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Henry Perez, OPHIRFA, United States of America, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Complainant’s main website is located at the domain name , registered in 1999.
The disputed domain name was registered on November 29, 2019. ...
2020-09-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mucahid Saki of Florida, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-08-05 - Case Details
Respondent is Adam Stevenson, Global Domain Services of Manhattan, New York, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Finally, Complainant asserts that Respondent is using the domain name in issue for commercial gain insofar as, noted above, the disputed domain name resolves to PPC links to IBM sites. ...
2016-10-10 - Case Details
Respondent is Brandon Harden of Denver, Colorado, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name incorporated Complainant’s mark in its entirety, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2018-01-10 - Case Details
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Respondent has not used the disputed domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of goods or services. Instead, the disputed domain name resolves to a website that copies Complainant’s website content.
...
2021-07-26 - Case Details
According to Complainant, it did not authorize Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name and Respondent is not making a bona fide use of the disputed domain name as the disputed domain name has never hosted an active website. ...Respondent, thus, registered the disputed domain name in bad faith.
THE ELF ON THE SHELF mark has no obvious non-trademark value, and there is no plausible legitimate use for the disputed domain name. ...
2018-12-24 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc. of Panama / Robin Connelly of Bahrain.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainants
The Complainants contend that the Domain Name is identical to its Mark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name, and that the Respondent registered and is using the Domain Name in bad faith within the meaning of paragraph 4(b)(i) of the Policy.
...
2019-01-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Simon Cartwright, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Discussion and Findings
For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2019-08-06 - Case Details
Customer 0153816156, Canada / Dion Dudley, Grownmark, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Stephen Jadon, Cameroon.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Respondent is not known by the mark SUDOCREM and has not used the disputed domain name for a bona fide offering of goods or services, and is not making a legitimate or fair use of the disputed domain name. ...
2020-10-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Fundacion Comercio Electronico, Carolina Rodrigues, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-10-03 - Case Details
Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Mossab Basir, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
Respondent has used the disputed domain name solely to resolve to a web site at which the disputed domain name is parked. By email Respondent has offered to sell the domain name to Complainant and/or to Complainant’s competitors. ...
2019-09-12 - Case Details
Respondent is Internet Consulting Services Inc., Cayman Islands, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-12-18 - Case Details
Rehmat Fatima of Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with eNom, Inc. ...The Complainant has exclusive rights in its trademark, and has not granted any permission to the Respondent to use VALIUM in the Domain Name. The Respondent uses the Domain Name for commercial gain. Internet users visiting the website associated to the Domain Name are directed to an on-line pharmacy.
...
2013-02-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fancy Bandwith a/k/a Fancy Bandwith, Inc. of Los Angeles, California, USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-11-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Godwin Olopa of Kassel, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot (the “Registrar”).
3. ...According to the Registrar, the Respondent registered the Domain Name on March 1, 2018. The Domain Name resolves, at the time of the drafting this Decision, to an error page.
5. ...
2018-05-03 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (‘the Domain Name’) is registered with Shinjiru Technology Sdn Bhd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name, is not commonly known by the Domain Name and has not been authorised by the Complainant. The Domain Name points to a page using the Complainant’s name and box logo and this is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use. ...
2019-01-07 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Protect, LLC (PrivacyProtect.org), Unites States of America / YONG WOON CHIN, Malaysia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Sav.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-03-22 - Case Details