Accordingly, the Panel accepts the Complainants’ request to consolidate the present proceedings pursuant
to the Rules, paragraph 10(e).
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants holds valid trademark rights for the STIHL trademark, which satisfies the initial
requirement under the first element that the Complainant hold rights for purposes of the Policy. ...
2023-06-23 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant owns numerous trade mark registrations for its CONTIKI trade mark including UK word
mark registration UK00002007887 registered on January 5, 1996 and Singaporean trade mark registration
T0205054I registered on May 21, 2003. ...
2023-11-28 - Case Details
Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceeding shall be English.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2024-05-03 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i-iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that: The disputed domain name is
identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established
by national law of a Member State and / or European Union Law. ...
2025-01-03 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i-iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights
are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union Law. ...
2024-11-12 - Case Details
Therefore, the Panel allows the consolidation of the Complainants in the present proceeding.
6.2. Procedural Issue
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or
established by national law of a Member State and/or European Union law
The Complainant has established earlier rights in the trademark IPTIQ registered in the European Union
(“EU”). ...
2024-08-30 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2025-09-02 - Case Details
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s ROYAL DRAGON SUPERIOR VODKA 5X DISTILLED and device mark.
The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. ...
2021-11-30 - Case Details
The Panel has authority to decide the dispute examining the three elements
in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, taking into consideration all of the relevant evidence, annexed material and
allegations, and performing some limited independent research under the general powers of the Panel
articulated, inter alia, in paragraph 10 of the Rules.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant indisputably has rights in the registered trademark QUATRO CASINO, both by virtue of its
trademark registrations and as a result of continuous use of this mark.
...
2022-11-02 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European law.
...
2021-07-06 - Case Details
Provided by the Complainant a copy of the pre-compliant communications with the Respondent suggests that the Respondent offered the disputed domain name for sale.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has proved its rights in the DEEZER trademarks through the EU trademarks and international registrations designating numerous countries worldwide including Russian Federation.
...
2021-06-24 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated its ownership of various registrations covering the OANDA trademark, such as U.S. ...
2021-01-25 - Case Details
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy directs that the Complainant must prove each of the following:
(i) that the disputed domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
(ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and
(iii) that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2021-04-19 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Article B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
- the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or EU-law;
- the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
6. ...
2021-07-01 - Case Details
The Panel sees no reason and particularly no disadvantage for the Respondent not to take the Complainant’s additional submission into account.
C. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is identical to the DENTSPA trademark of the Complainant.
...
2021-06-10 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or Community law, since the country code Top Level Domain “.eu” is technically necessary and cannot prevent a finding of confusing similarity.
...
2021-08-13 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Article B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
- the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or EU-law;
- the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
6. ...
2021-06-02 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or Community law;
The Respondent has a legitimate interests in the disputed domain name as it has registered a domain name consisting of a dictionary expression six years before the Respondent came into existence and acquired trade name rights; and
The Respondent has not registered and is not using the disputed domain name in bad faith;
6. ...
2021-07-26 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or Community law.
...
2017-09-18 - Case Details
The Panel is of the view, in the circumstances, that the Respondent has been afforded a fair opportunity to be heard on the matter and would not be prejudiced by the Panel’s determination that English is to be the language of the proceeding.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established it has rights in the mark FXCM. This trade mark has been incorporated in its entirety in the disputed domain name. ...
2016-04-13 - Case Details