The Respondent is Mark L Virgi, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with OnlineNic,
Inc. d/b/a China-Channel.com.
3. ...Worshiping, Chrisler, and Chr., aka Dream Media and aka Peter
Conover, WIPO Case No. D2000-1272,
and Telstra Corporation Ltd. v. Warren Bolton Consulting Pty Ltd., WIPO
Case No. ...
2006-05-08 - Case Details
Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0149511181 / Jerry Peter
Case No. D2018-1937
1. The Parties
The Complainant is L’Oréal of Paris, France, represented by Dreyfus & associés, France.
...The Respondent is Customer 0149511181 of Toronto, Canada / Jerry Peter of Ikeja, Nigeria and registered the disputed domain name on October 20, 2017.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. ...
2018-10-18 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on June 11, 2013.
The Center appointed Peter J. Dernbach as the sole panelist in this matter on June 17, 2013. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Disputed Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
Peter J. Dernbach
Sole Panelist
Date: June 25, 2013...
2013-07-08 - Case Details
f. On April 4, 2000, the Center appointed Mr. Alan L Limbury sole panelist
and that day notified the parties of the appointment and of the projected decision
date of April 18, 2000. ...The complainant’s own use of the name "Maersk" is as part of the surname of the complainant’s founders, Captain Peter Maersk Møller (the "Captain") and his son, Arnold Peter Møller, derived from the surname of the Captain’s mother.
...
2000-04-19 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on August 5, 2003.
The Center appointed Peter G. Nitter, Yong Li and Clive L. Elliott as Panelists in this matter on August 19, 2003. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with Paragraphs 4(i) of the
Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name,
be transferred to the Complainant.
Peter G. Nitter
Presiding Panelist
Yong Li
Panelist
Clive L. Elliott
Panelist
Dated: September 2, 2003...
2003-09-18 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on March 26, 2010.
The Center appointed Alan L. Limbury as the sole panelist in this matter on March 31, 2010. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Domain Name, be transferred to the Complainant.
Alan L. Limbury
Sole Panelist
Date: April 14, 2010...
2010-04-28 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center January 24, 2003.
The Center appointed Alan L. Limbury, Bradley A. Slutsky and G. Gervaise Davis
III as panelists in this matter on February 7, 2003. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.
Alan L. Limbury
Presiding Panelist
Bradley A. Slutsky
Panelist
G. Gervaise Davis III
Panelist
Date: February 19, 2003...
2003-03-03 - Case Details
A statement of acceptance and declaration of impartiality and independence has been filed by the Panelist.
3.3 The date scheduled for the Panel to render its decision is June 8, 2000.
3.4 The Complainant is represented by Peter L. Simmons, Esq. and Pauline L. Wen, of the firm of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, One New York Plaza, New York, New York 10004-1980. ...
2000-06-13 - Case Details
Le 4 janvier 2008, le Centre a adressé à l’Association Française pour le Nommage Internet en Coopération (ci-après l’“Afnic”) une demande aux fins de vérification des éléments du litige et de gel des opérations.
Le 7 janvier 2008, l’Afnic a confirmé l’ensemble des données du litige.
...La reprise et l’imitation de la marque enregistrée BACCARAT du Requérant et son utilisation pour permettre au public d’être mis en relation avec des fabricants ou distributeurs de produits identiques ou similaires aux siens est un acte de contrefaçon de marque au sens des articles L.713-1 à L.713-3 et L.716-9 à L.716-11 du Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle.
Est ainsi réalisée une atteinte aux droits de propriété industrielle du Requérant protégés en France.
...
2008-03-07 - Case Details
Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI
DECISIÓN DEL GRE
Facebook, Inc. c. Peter Malandrinos
Caso No. DPE2021-0002
1. Las Partes
La Reclamante es Facebook, Inc., Estados Unidos de América (“Estados Unidos”), representada por Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP.
El Titular es Peter Malandrinos, Estados Unidos.
2. El nombre de Dominio y el Administrador
La Solicitud tiene como objeto el nombre de dominio en disputa (el “Nombre de Dominio”), registrado con NIC.PE.
3. ...
2021-11-17 - Case Details
The Respondent is MVTALBUMS - Mega Top Video Albums / Peter Mladshi, of Podvojskogo
st. 29/680, St. Petersburg SP 191119, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names are and .
...Decision
Pursuant to paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel directs
that the disputed domain names and
be transferred to Complainant.
Alan L. Limbury
Sole Panelist
Dated: April 16, 2002...
2002-04-22 - Case Details
These elements are insufficient to distinguish the Domain Name as referring to an entity other than the Complainant (Patties Foods Limited v. Studio Support, Peter Lock, Ian Cameron,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0930; Farouk Systems, Inc. v. QYM,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1572; Philip Morris USA Inc. v. ...DIR2007-0002; Société des Produits Nestlé SA v. Peter Carrington, c/o Party Night Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0954; and Société des Produits Nestlé SA v. ...
2010-02-12 - Case Details
Further, the replacement of the letter “i” by the letter “l” is a typical typosquatting tactic. This is especially the case here because the Complainant’s primary domain name is identical to the disputed domain name apart from this one-letter substitution.
...Worshipping, Chrisler, and Chr, aka Dream Media and aka Peter Conover,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1272; Playboy Enterprises v. Movie Name Company,
WIPO Case No. D2001-1201; and Sidecar Health, Inc. v. ...
2022-01-26 - Case Details
The only difference between the Complainant’s trademark
and the disputed domain name is the replacement of the letter “i” with “l”, a practice commonly known as
typosquatting. It may be noted that in some fonts, the letters “i” and “l” seem almost identical. ...DCO2015-0015 ( held
confusingly similar to the AIRTEL); Wachovia Corporation v. Peter Carrington, WIPO Case No. D2002-0775
(, held virtually identical / confusingly similar to WACHOVIA); Backstreet
Productions, Inc. v. ...
2023-03-01 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on September 3, 2019.
The Center appointed Peter Burgstaller as the sole panelist in this matter on September 9, 2019. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Peter Burgstaller
Sole Panelist
Date: September 21, 2019...
2019-10-03 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on May 21, 2012.
The Center appointed Alan L. Limbury as the sole panelist in this matter on May 24, 2012. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the Domain Name be transferred to the Complainant.
Alan L. Limbury
Sole Panelist
Dated: May 30, 2012...
2012-06-08 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
BAL DU MOULIN ROUGE v. Peter Svoboda, 3Dimenzia, sro
Case No. D2025-5141
1. The Parties
Complainant is BAL DU MOULIN ROUGE, France, represented by CASALONGA, France.
Respondent is Peter Svoboda, 3Dimenzia, sro, Slovakia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gransy, s.r.o. d/b/a subreg.cz (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...
2026-02-05 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent's default on March 26, 2018.
The Center appointed Peter Wild as the sole panelist in this matter on April 6, 2018. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Peter Wild
Sole Panelist
Date: April 10, 2018...
2018-04-20 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on June 13, 2003.
The Center appointed Peter G. Nitter as the sole panelist in this matter on June 17, 2003. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with Paragraphs 4 (i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name, be transferred to the Complainant.
Peter G. Nitter
Sole Panelist
Date: July 1, 2003...
2003-07-11 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Espirito Santo Financial Group S.A. v. Peter Colman
Case No. D2001-1214
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Espirito Santo Financial Group S.A. of 231 Val des Bons
Malades, Luxembourg-Kirchberg.
...They are:
5.1 Laurent Perrier S.A. & Anor v. Mr. L Perrier & Others WIPO
Case No: D2000-0396
5.1.1 The French Proceedings
The domain names in issue were and .
...
2002-02-04 - Case Details