D2004-0201; Virgin Enterprises Limited v. Steve Peter H S Kok and James Tan,
WIPO Case No. DCC2002-0001. It should be noted that an apparent change in registrant appears in the WhoIs database. ...D2000-1449 (the domain name differs from the mark merely by the addition of the letter “l” in the domain name, and such addition does not prevent the domain name from being considered virtually identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark); Alta Vista Co. v. ...
2008-12-24 - Case Details
Details of the trademark registrations in countries outside Australia are set out in Annexures K and L to the Complaint.
Complainant’s Domain Names and Web Sites
The Complainant is the registrant of the following domain names containing the word "TELSTRA":
-
-
-
-
-
-; and
-
For several years, the Complainant has operated its principal website at , followed by . ...D2000-0919, , ,
, , ,
Telstra Corporation Limited v. Peter Lombardo & Ors, WIPO
Case No. D2000-1511, , Telstra Corporation Limited
v. ...
2002-05-13 - Case Details
On September 17, 2001, the Center notified the parties of the appointment of
Alan L. Limbury to serve as panelist, Mr. Limbury having submitted
a Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence.
...In re Polar Music Int’l AB,
221 U.S.P.Q. 1088, 1091 (TTAB 1998); In re Peter Spirer, 225 U.S. P.Q.
693 (TTAB 1995).
8. Bernardaud Porcelaines de Limoges
S.A. et al. v. ...
2001-10-11 - Case Details
Roman Abreu d/b/a Smartalk
Wireless, WIPO Case No. D2002-0605
(September 11, 2002), Peter Frampton v. Frampton Enterprises, Inc., WIPO
Case No. D2002-0141 (April 17, 2002); America Online, Inc. v.
...Thirdly, the evidence that has been collected and adduced by the Complainant in Annexes L and M to its Complaint shows that the Respondents have in fact been trading on the Complainant’s goodwill and in an entirely illegitimate manner. ...
2005-02-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ghurair Group, Greensboro, North
Carolina, United States of America, represented by Mr. Peter J. Willsey and
Mr. Adam L. Barea, United States of America.
2. The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names and
(the “Domain names”) are registered with Dotster,
Inc.
3. ...
2004-11-15 - Case Details
Ownership
of the mark SALLIE MAE does not ipso facto give Complainant the exclusive
right to the descriptive name “Sallie” in all contexts (and cites
PRIMEDIA Special Interest Publications Inc. v. John L. Treadway, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0752). In the public mind, the mark SALLIE will be regarded
as generic.
...Registration of an ordinary word as a domain name,
and use of that domain name for an ordinary, non-trademark significance, can
be a legitimate interest (citing Thrifty, Inc. and Thrifty Rent-A-Car System,
Inc. v. Peter George, WIPO Case No. D2002-0140;
Seaway Bolt & Specials Corp. v. Digital Income Inc., National Arbitration
Forum Case No. ...
2004-11-09 - Case Details
Technology Associates,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0024, TMP Worldwide Inc. v. Jennifer L Potter,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0536, Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. v. Myers,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0190, The Laurel Pub Company Limited v. Peter Robertson / Turfdata,
WIPO Case No. DTV2004-0007, Triodos Bank NV v. Ashley Dobbs,
WIPO Case No. ...
2008-03-13 - Case Details
registered January 27, 2016;
L registered February 20, 2016;
M. registered March 11, 2016;
N. ...See WIPO Overview 2.0, paragraph 1.2 ("[t]he threshold test for confusing similarity under the UDRP involves a comparison between the trademark and the domain name itself to determine likelihood of Internet user confusion."); see alsoWachovia Corporation v. Peter Carrington,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0775 ("[Purposeful misspelling], commonly referred to as 'typo squatting,' creates a virtually identical and/or confusingly similar mark to the Complainant's trademark under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy."); CPP, Inc. v. ...
2017-02-21 - Case Details
The Respondent rejects the Complainant’s submission seeking transfer of the Disputed Domain Name based on claimed superior rights and states that “the Policy does not concern itself with ‘better rights’ but with the complete absence of rights in a maliciously registered domain name” (citing: Credit Europe Bank N.V. v. Peter Yu,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0737).
Finally, the Respondent contends that the Complaint is brought in bad faith, in an attempt to “pirate the domain name” by reverse domain name hijacking, as contemplated by paragraph 15(e) of the Rules and as evidenced by the Complainant’s incorrect belief that the Disputed Domain Name was registered by the Respondent for thirteen years prior to the Complainant’s existence (citing: Prime Pictures LLC v. ...D2000-1202; and carsales.com.au Limited v. Alton L. Flanders,,
WIPO Case No. D2004-0047.
In reaching its conclusions on Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, the Panel has also been influenced by the following considerations. ...
2012-05-31 - Case Details
La razón para el Promovente lo constituye el “uso de la página Web y acceso a las cuentas de administración de los dominios”. El Promovente considera que “[l]a página de entrada del sitio Web ha sido sustituida por otra página que no tiene nada que ver con los productos que el demandante exhibe a través de ese medio y más aún, cualquier información ahí mostrada es no avalada por demandante”. ...Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. sony.net,
Decisión OMPI D2000-1074 o Telstra
Corporation Limited v. Peter Yellowees, Decisión
OMPI D2002-0638 (no hay justificación posible para elegir un nombre de dominio
cuando se conocen los derechos); Tetra Banka, Akciová Spolo Nos v. ...
2004-10-22 - Case Details
Technology Associates,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0024; TMP Worldwide
Inc. v. Jennifer L. Potter, WIPO Case
No. D2000-0536; Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. v. Myers, WIPO
Case No. D2000-0190. This view is not representative of the consensus of
opinion in criticism site cases outside the United States, which appears to
be that a respondent has no right to use a domain name identical or confusingly
similar to the complainant’s mark for purposes of criticism. See, e.g.,
The Laurel Pub Company Limited v. Peter Robertson / Turfdata, WIPO
Case No. DTV2004-0007; Triodos Bank NV v. Ashley Dobbs, WIPO
Case No. ...
2005-02-11 - Case Details
Explaining its reasoning, the Ninth Circuit quoted Prestonettes, Inc. v.
Coty 264 U.S. 359, 368, 44 S. Ct. 350, 351, 68 L. Ed. 731 (1924) for the
precedent that trademark law does not allow a claimant to enshrine a word exclusively
for its own use: “When the mark is being used in a way that does not deceive
the public we see no such sanctity in the word as to prevent its being used
to tell the truth.”
...V., Estrategia, S.A. de
C.v., Videoserpel, Ltd. v. Party Night Inc., a/k/a Peter Carrington,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0796.
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the trademark and service mark KAZAA which entitle the Complainant to proceed under the “Policy”.
...
2004-08-17 - Case Details
USearch, Inc., eResolution, Case No. AF-0250 decided by Alan L. Limbury, Geert Glas and David Sorkin; e-Duction, Inc. v. John Zuccarini , d/b/a The Cupcake Party & Cupcake Movies,
WIPO Case No. ...Ecorp.com, eResolution, Case No. AF-0308 decided by G. Peter Albert, Jr., David Sorkin and M. Scott Donahey.
The Complainant cites City Views Limited v. Moniker Privacy Services / Xander, Jeduyu, ALGEBRALIVE,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-03-04 - Case Details
The burden of proof for establishing that the disputed domain names are subject to common control is a preponderance of the evidence, as stated amongst others in Seiko Holdings Kabushiki Kaisha v. L. Collins Travis, C. Turner Jose, et al.,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0994; and Lanc me Parfums Et Beaut Et Compagnie v. ...D2014-0496 (finding the word “purchase” in the domain name purely descriptive);
The Panel also notes that the use of the term “generic” in association with the Complainant’s trademarks in some of the disputed domain names is not sufficient to negate confusing similarity under the first element of the Policy, as stated amongst others in Roche Products Inc. v. Peter Tonderby/Tonderby Designs Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0698 (finding confusingly similar to the VALIUM trademark).
...
2015-04-07 - Case Details