Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s registered trademark INTERHOME, except for the use of the letter “L” instead of “I”. It is very hard to distinguish a miniscule “L” from a capital “I”, so the graphical appearance of “lnterhome” (with a miniscule “L”) and “Interhome” (with a capital “I”) is virtually identical.
...Decision
For all the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the domain name (with a miniscule "L") be transferred to the Complainant.
Tobias Zuberbühler
Sole Panelist
Dated: October 26, 2010...
2010-11-10 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on November 16, 2022.
page 2
The Center appointed Peter Burgstaller as the sole panelist in this matter on November 25, 2022. The Panel
finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Peter Burgstaller/
Peter Burgstaller
Sole Panelist
Date: November 28, 2022
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Johnson & Johnson v. ...
2022-12-08 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on December 25, 2024.
page 2
The Center appointed Peter Kružliak as the sole panelist in this matter on January 6, 2025. The Panel finds
that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
/Peter Kružliak/
Peter Kružliak
Sole Panelist
Date: January 20, 2025
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2025-01-28 - Case Details
The proprietor of the Domain Name is Visneto AB and the connection between this company and Projektor System Salem AB is somewhat unclear, however it is clear and not questioned that the same person, Mr. L.‑Å. T., has been involved and operated both companies and did it successfully as the Arbitrator understands it.
...The Domain Holder has not showed any circumstances that would constitute rights or justified interest in the Domain Name.
Peter Hedberg
Date: October 23, 2018
1 The Arbitrator notes that the .se Registry (IIS) confirmed that the registrant was L....
2018-11-01 - Case Details
The Response was filed with the Center July 7, 2020.
The Center appointed Robert A. Badgley, Peter J. Dernbach and Frank L. Politano as panelists in this matter on August 11, 2020. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.
Robert A. Badgley
Presiding Panelist
Peter J. Dernbach
Panelist
Frank L. Politano
Panelist
Date: September 14, 2020...
2020-09-18 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on July 15, 2021.
The Center appointed Peter Burgstaller as the sole panelist in this matter on July 21, 2021. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name reproduces the trademark MICHELIN in its entirety with the mere addition of the letter “l”. Therefore, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s MICHELIN trademark.
...
2021-08-04 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
SODEXO v. Peter C Foy, “Sodexo”
Case No. D2022-3643
1. The Parties
The Complainant is SODEXO, France, represented by Areopage, France.
The Respondent is Peter C Foy, “Sodexo”, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain names and are registered with Google LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...
2023-01-02 - Case Details
Moreover, the mere repeated “l” and “-” does not significantly affect the appearance or pronunciation of the disputed domain name. This conduct is commonly referred to as “typosquatting” and results into confusing similarity. See Wachovia Corporation v. Peter Carrington,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0775; and Schneider Electric S.A. v. Domain Whois Protect Service / Cyber Domain Services Pvt. ...
2019-02-14 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondents’ default on November 19, 2025.
The Center appointed Peter Burgstaller as the sole panelist in this matter on November 24, 2025. The Panel
finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain names and be
transferred to the Complainant.
/Peter Burgstaller/
Peter Burgstaller
Sole Panelist
Date: December 8, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Ile-De-France Mobilités v. ...
2025-12-10 - Case Details
In addition, other WIPO panelists have found that Zuccarini and Party Night
and Phayze are the same entity. In Microsoft Corp. v. Party Night, Inc. d/b/a
Peter Carrington, WIPO Case No. D2003-0501
the Panel finds it established that ‘Party Night Inc.’ and ‘Peter Carrington’
are identical to John Zuccarini. ...Reference is made to Microsoft Corporation v. Party Night
Inv. D/b/a Peter Carrington, WIPO Case No. D2003-0501
and Washington Mutual Inc. v. Phayze Inc., Peter Carrington and Party
Night Inc., WIPO Case No. ...
2003-10-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
EXPERT DECISION
Novartis AG v. L. L.W.
Case No. DCH2021-0021
1. The Parties
The Claimant is Novartis AG, of Switzerland, represented by BrandIT GmbH, Switzerland.
...Expert Decision
For the above reasons, in accordance with paragraph 24 of the Rules of Procedure, the Expert orders that the Disputed Domain Name be transferred to the Claimant.
Peter Wild
Expert
Dated: September 1, 2021...
2021-09-08 - Case Details
Peter Chrocziel and Mr. Thomas L. Creel were appointed Panelists and Mr. David Perkins was appointed as the Presiding Panelist. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, the Panel decides that the Complainant has failed to satisfy the elements of paragraph 4a(iii) of the Policy and accordingly, the Complaint fails.
David Perkins
Presiding Panelist
Peter Chrocziel
Panelist
Thomas L. Creel
Panelist
Dated: January 29, 2001...
2001-02-28 - Case Details
On this basis the Panel finds that the Complaint was forwarded to Respondent in accordance with the Rules paragraph 2.
The Center appointed Peter G. Nitter as the Sole Panelist in this matter on September 2, 2003. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...The domain name contains all
the letters of the trademark except the letter "l" which is instead
represented as number "1." Therefore, when viewed together, the domain
name and the Telstra mark look almost identical. ...
2003-09-17 - Case Details
No separate Response was filed by BCL.
The Center appointed Alan L. Limbury as the sole panelist in this matter on October 2, 2003. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...On June 26, 2000, EPS registered the domain name and on the same day Mr. Peter Wright registered the disputed domain name . Mr. Wright’s organization was stated to be EPS. ...
2003-10-23 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on July 16, 2003.
The Center appointed Peter G. Nitter as the sole panelist in this matter on July 23, 2003. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Thus, the only difference between the two is an extra letter ‘l’ in the contested domain name.
An extra consonant placed together with already double consonants in a word, is easy to overlook. ...
2003-08-21 - Case Details
See Wachovia Corporation v. Peter Carrington,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0775, “This conduct, commonly referred to as ‘typo squatting ‘, creates a virtually identical and/or confusingly similar mark to the Complainant’s trademark under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy”.
...The purposeful misspelling of Complainant’s trademark XENICAL results in confusingly similar domain names under paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. See Wachovia Corporation v. Peter Carrington,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0775.
The Panel finds that the Complainant has proven that the domain names in dispute are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark.
...
2007-07-24 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on February 11, 2016.
The Center appointed Peter Burgstaller as the sole panelist in this matter on February 16, 2016. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Peter Burgstaller
Sole Panelist
Date: February, 26, 2016...
2016-03-10 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Hobsons, Inc. v. Peter Carrington a/k/a/ Party Night Inc.
Case No. D2003-0317
1. The Parties
The Complainant in this administrative proceeding is Hobsons, Inc., of Ohio, United States of America.
...v) In these circumstances, this appears to be a clear case of what is known
as "typo-squatting" or "typo-piracy" [see for example: Wachovia
Corporation v. Peter Carrington, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0775 (October 2, 2002); DaimlerChrysler Corporation and
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC v. ...
2003-07-25 - Case Details
Telmex Management Services,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0070; Société des Produits Nestlé SA v. Peter Carrington, c/o Party Night Inc.;
WIPO Case No. D2002-0954, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v. Sonia de Ferrero,
WIPO Case No. ...D2016-0385; Telstra Corporation Limited v. Nuclear Marshmallows,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0003; L' Oréal v. Cimpress Schweiz GmbH,WIPOCaseNo. DCO2017-0021;Accenture Global Services Limited v. Jean Jacque / Luck Loic, supra; Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co LLP v. ...
2018-08-30 - Case Details
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on February 17, 2020.
The Center appointed Peter Burgstaller as the sole panelist in this matter on March 3, 2020. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant.
Peter Burgstaller
Sole Panelist
Date: March 14, 2020...
2020-03-26 - Case Details