Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840, LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260, and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hasings Jr.,
WIPO Case No. ...D2008-1715 (“The Panel finds it established that the trademark LEGO is well-known”), LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench,
WIPO Case No. DNL2009-0052 (“Complainant has established that the LEGO trademark has acquired a high reputation and should be considered as well-recognized and world famous”), and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-11-25 - Case Details
LEGO Juris A/S v. Kiana Seyfi, Lego,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1166; LEGO Juris A/S v. shilei,
WIPO Case No. D2016-0152; LEGO Juris A/S v. Park KyeongSook,
WIPO Case No. D2016-1195; LEGO Juris A/S v. Viktor Tkachev, Lego Town,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-05-17 - Case Details
Additionally, the Complainant owns thousands of domain names containing the word “lego” where most of them put the word “lego” at the beginning such as <lego-agent.info>, <lego-star-wars.com> and nearly 4,300 domain names including the ones containing the word “starwars” following the word “lego”...(2) The Complainant is the owner of the LEGO trademark and the domain names containing the word “lego” such as <lego-star-wars.net>, <lego-starwars.de>, <lego-starwors.de> and <lego-starwarsshop.com>...
2015-09-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Zhangming Li
Case No. D2020-2350
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established it has rights in the LEGO trade mark. The LEGO trade mark is without doubt a well-known trade mark. The LEGO trade mark has been reproduced in its entirety in the disputed domain name and is easily identifiable. ...
2020-11-03 - Case Details
Factual Background
Complainant in these proceedings is LEGO Juris A/S, a leading company in the field of children’s toys and games (“LEGO”).
According to the non-contested allegations provided by Complainant, Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks in the LEGO family of marks in a number of jurisdictions around the world (collectively, the “LEGO Marks”). ...See Lego Juris A/S v. Synergy Management, Fred Shear,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1028.
Over the years, LEGO has devoted substantial resources and efforts to building goodwill in LEGO Marks, which are used in connection with the sale of LEGO’s products throughout the world. ...
2011-07-21 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. David
Case No. D2023-2519
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...D2008-1715, where the panel recognized that LEGO is a well-known and distinctive
trademark; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr., WIPO Case No. ...
2023-08-18 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant (based in Denmark) is the owner of the LEGO brand, and all other trade marks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO-branded products. ...D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael
Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-04-15 - Case Details
The LEGO group has expanded use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. 2010-0840 (“LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. 2010-1260 (“In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”); and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-07-18 - Case Details
Indeed, the LEGO trademark and brand have been recognized as being famous.
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...See LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692, LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPOCase No. ...
2015-03-19 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Domainvault Corp
Case No. D2012-2344
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-02-12 - Case Details
The LEGO group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Domain Name <lego-kaitori.info> comprises the word “lego”, which is identical to the registered trademark LEGO, which has been registered by the Complainant as trademarks and used in domain names in numerous countries all over the world. ...
2012-06-05 - Case Details
The menu bar formerly displayed tabs with labels including LEGO City, LEGO Classic, LEGO
Technic, and LEGO Disney. The LEGO logo is displayed in a product image. ...As regards registration, the disputed domain name was registered in 2022, decades after the registration of
the Complainant’s LEGO trademarks, including in China where the Respondent is based. The disputed
domain name wholly incorporates the LEGO mark as its initial element and resolves to a website that
displays the LEGO mark, the LEGO logo, names of the Complainant’s product ranges (such as LEGO City
and LEGO Classic), and images of the Complainant’s toys. ...
2023-07-06 - Case Details
The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries. The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets.
...In view of the above, the relevant section of the disputed domain name is "lego-airport". This section contains two elements – "lego" and "airport". The "lego" element is identical to the LEGO trademark, while the "airport" element is a generic word with no particular distinctiveness. ...
2016-10-11 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. SABRINA HOPKINS
Case No. D2024-5243
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...To the contrary, the disputed domain name at
some point resolved to a website at “www.legobatcave.store” set up in the English language, which offered
LEGO products from Complainant’s LEGO BATCAVE series of toys for online sale without any authorization
by Complainant to do so, thereby prominently displaying Complainant’s official LEGO logo. ...
2025-02-18 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Narong Sangaed
Case No. D2013-0917
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Sweden, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant is the registered owner of the trademark LEGO in numerous countries. A list of the LEGO trademark registrations of the Complainant is attached to the Complaint.
...
2013-08-08 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant’s trademark LEGO is a trademark for construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
The LEGO mark has been used in relation to such goods for decades in many countries throughout the world. ...D2010-0659, LEGO Juris A/S v. Goodsteed Limited,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0797 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Domains by Proxy, Inc....
2010-10-15 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO, and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Complainant and its licensees (collectively the “LEGO Group of Companies” or the “LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States of America during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...
2012-07-03 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. mochamad hidayat
Case No. D2012-0944
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the LEGO Trademark, and recognizes (in line with affirmations of previous UDRP decisions) the famous nature of the LEGO Trademark.
...
2012-06-21 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Guo Rong
Case No. D2012-0953
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Panel concludes that Complainant has rights in the LEGO Trademark, and recognizes (in line with affirmations of previous UDRP decisions) the famous nature of the LEGO Trademark.
...
2012-07-05 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...Several prior UDRP decisions have held that the LEGO mark is well-known, including LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0680 ("The LEGO mark is well-known worldwide"); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2015-05-04 - Case Details