Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO, and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Complainant and its licensees (collectively the “LEGO Group of Companies” or the “LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States of America during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...
2012-07-03 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant’s trademark LEGO is a trademark for construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
The LEGO mark has been used in relation to such goods for decades in many countries throughout the world. ...D2010-0659, LEGO Juris A/S v. Goodsteed Limited,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0797 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Domains by Proxy, Inc....
2010-10-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Torsten Kruger
Case No. D2017-2187
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including Germany. The Complainant also owns close to 5,000 domain names incorporating the term "lego". ...
2018-02-09 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. Mystery Lego, Lego Mystery Box
Case No. D2025-3963
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Holding A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...case=D2006-1095
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Holding A/S v. Mystery Lego, Lego Mystery Box
Case No. D2025-3963
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2025-11-21 - Case Details
The language of the proceedings is English in accordance with paragraph 11(a) of the Rules.
4. Factual Background
The Complainant LEGO Juris A/S, based in Denmark, is the owner of the well-known LEGO trademark and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...See LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...
2012-10-29 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is part of the LEGO Group and has its historical headquarters in Denmark. The LEGO Group has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world.
...Furthermore, the case file shows that the disputed domain names were used to create and operate commercial websites using the LEGO logo, reproducing the famous LEGO figurines without authorization, and purportedly offering the LEGO products for sale. ...
2021-03-25 - Case Details
The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.
4. Factual Background
LEGO Juris A/S, based in Denmark is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies or the LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...In this respect it is important to mention the fact that Lego manufactures and sells a line of SPONGEBOB LEGO pieces (annex 13).
Since the domain name clearly refers to a world famous cartoon that Lego has been merchandising one can reasonably conclude that the Respondent had perfect knowledge of the existence of the LEGO trademark and the fact that Lego was merchandising the Spongebob cartoon. ...
2011-02-07 - Case Details
LEGO does not allow any 3rd parties, including resellers, to use the LEGO or LEGOLAND brands (or other brands owned by the LEGO group) in domain names. It is the strict policy of the LEGO Group that all domain names containing the word LEGO and LEGOLAND should be owned by the LEGO Group. ...
2011-05-17 - Case Details
D2009-0564; Lego Juris A/S v. Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0500; LEGO Juris A/S v. Mike Morgan,
WIPO Case No. ...D2009-0381; LEGO Juris A/S v. Zhijun Guo,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0184; LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-11-24 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant based in Denmark is the owner of LEGO marks, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products, including in Indonesia. ...The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...
2012-08-31 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Dealwave
Case No. D2010-0881
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Corporate Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Factual Background
The Complainant’s trademark LEGO is a trademark for construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
The LEGO mark has been used in relation to such goods for decades in many countries throughout the world. ...
2010-08-19 - Case Details
In addition, in
2014, TIME also announced LEGO to be the Most Influential Toy of All Time.
The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and
software, books, videos, and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...In the present case, the Panel notes that the Complainant’s rights to the LEGO trademark predate the
registration date of the disputed domain name.
The LEGO trademark enjoys of a well-known character, recognized by earlier UDRP panels as well (see
LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2023-12-13 - Case Details
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies” or the “LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States in 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trademark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...
2011-02-11 - Case Details
The LEGO Group also maintains an extensive web site under the domain name “www.lego.com”.
Over the years, the business of LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. ...Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant LEGO Juris A/S based in Denmark is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products, including in Ukraine. ...
2012-06-14 - Case Details
The Complainant is the owner of Viet Nam Trademark Registration no. 4-
0013197-000 (registered on September 1, 1994) for a stylized LEGO trademark; and Lego GmbH is the
owner of International Trademark LEGO no. 287932 (registered on August 27, 1964, and protected
especially in Viet Nam) for the word trademark LEGO.
...The dominant part of the disputed domain name
comprises the term “lego”, identical to the Complainant’s registered trademark LEGO, whose fame has been
confirmed in numerous previous UDRP decisions. ...
2022-07-14 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Ningbo LEGO Culture Communication Co., Ltd.
Case No. D2013-1208
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Billund of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...See LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda ,
WIPO Case No. 2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. 2010-1260; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-09-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. lin zhang
Case No. D2020-0675
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Panel also finds as have previous UDRP panels, that the LEGO Mark has achieved the status of worldwide fame. See e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-05-21 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Rouger Chuk
Case No. D2024-5210
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...In addition, several prior UDRP decisions recognized the distinctive and well-known nature of the
Complainant’s LEGO trademark (including, LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp., WIPO Case No. D2008-1692;
LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2025-02-27 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Yuewei wang
Case No. D2011-1920
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
The Complainant has denied licensing or authorizing the Respondent to use the LEGO Trademark. The evidence also does not indicate that the Respondent is known by the name “Lego” or in any way associated with the LEGO Trademark. ...
2012-02-23 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...Furthermore, the BIONICLE line is a LEGO selling theme. The LEGO Group has applied for and/or registered the BIONICLE mark in over 30 countries.
...
2010-08-09 - Case Details