LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in the United Kingdom. The LEGO Group started to use the name “lego” in 1953 to identify construction toys made and sold by it. The revenue of the LEGO Group in 2009 was more than USD 2.8 billion. The global market share of the LEGO Group in 2010 was 5.9%.
...
2013-02-05 - Case Details
See e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. ...D2020-0823; LEGO Juris A/S v. Nadir Boukeraa,
WIPO Case No. D2020-0874; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Wu Zhang,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-12-07 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. The word mark LEGO (Reg. No. 000039800) was registered in the European Union on May 10, 1998. The design mark LEGO (Reg. ...
2015-11-03 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant in this proceeding, LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, is the owner of the world-renowned LEGO trademark used in connection with the famous LEGO construction toys and other LEGO-branded products.
...Based on the LEGO NINJAGO toy line, the LEGO NINJAGO movie is a 3D computer-animated action comedy martial arts film produced by Warner Animation Group. ...
2018-01-22 - Case Details
Mr. Knudstorp, who is the president of Lego, expects that Lego will be the market leader by 2020. Lego has been present in China for 15 years. Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the Lego Group of Companies or the Lego Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States of America during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...
2010-07-26 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr
Case No. D2009-0680
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
...The Complainant also owns numerous domain names containing the term “lego”.
The use of the LEGO mark commenced in the United States (“US”) in 1953 to identify construction toys. ...
2009-07-21 - Case Details
See LEGO Juris A/S v. John Davies,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0160; Lego Juris A/S v. Hu Liang/Dolego,
WIPO Case No. ...D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Palmer,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1826; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-06-03 - Case Details
The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and
LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in the United States.
The Complainant is the owner of the following trademark registrations for the sign LEGO (the “LEGO
trademark”):
− the Austrian trademark LEGO with registration No. 32809, registered on June 16, 1955 for goods in
International Classes 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 28, 19, 24, 26, 18, 27, 25, 20, and 30;
− the International trademark LEGO with registration No. 287932, registered on August 27, 1964 for goods in
International Class 28;
− the United Kingdom trademark LEGO with registration No. ...The Complainant is the owner of the following trademark registrations for the sign LEGO (the “LEGO trademark”):
− the Austrian trademark LEGO with registration No. 32809, registered on June 16, 1955 for goods in International Classes 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 28, 19, 24, 26, 18, 27, 25, 20, and 30;
− the International trademark LEGO with registration No. 287932, registered on August 27, 1964 for goods in International Class 28;
− the United Kingdom trademark LEGO with registration No. ...
2022-07-13 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant, based in Denmark, has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and the LEGO
brand construction toys and other LEGO branded products (the “LEGO Products”) are sold in more than 130
countries. ...D2022-3025 (); see also LEGO Juris A/S v. I Made Irawan, - DRI-
110993, WIPO Case No. D2014-1538 (<lego-shopping.com>); and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2023-07-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is UAB "Memelio zaislai of Klaipeda, Lithuania doing business as Memeltoys.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
LEGO Juris A/S is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO brand toys has grown remarkably. By way of example, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2009, was more than USD2,8 billion. 2010 was another good year for the LEGO Group. ...
2012-02-21 - Case Details
<lego-king.com> Name.com, Inc.
<lego-mega.com> Name.com, Inc.
<lego-senang.com> Name.com, Inc.
<lego-super.com> Name.com, Inc.
...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain names <lego-baru.com>, <lego-bos.com>, <lego-jitu.site>, <lego-kilat.com>,
<lego-king.com>, <lego-mega.com>, <lego-senang.com>, <lego-super.com>, ,
<lego-ultra.com>, <lego-wp.site>, , , <lego-33.com>, ,
, , , , ,
, , , <lego-33.site>, ,
, , , , ,
, , , , ,
be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2024-08-20 - Case Details
The LEGO trademark is registered in Indonesia, where the Respondent is situated. The Complainant and its licensees, through their predecessors in business, commenced use of the LEGO trademark in the United States of America in 1953 and the annual revenue of the LEGO Group of Companies has grown to more than USD 2.8 billion. ...LEGO is rated as a ‘Superbrand‘ in a report set out in Annex 9 to the Complaint, which shows LEGO as number 8 of the most famous trademarks and brands in the world.
...
2012-05-18 - Case Details
The Complainant also owns over 450 domain name registrations containing the word LEGO. All of the domain names containing the word LEGO are owned by the Complainant.
The Complainant has extensively advertised and promoted its LEGO trademark on products, packaging, displays, and other promotional materials. ...Those common words do not have any impact on the overall impression of the dominant part of the domain name, “lego”, which is recognizable as the famous LEGO trademark of the Complainant. In addition, the domain names are all misspellings of the trademark LEGO by the addition of the letter “s” to the mark. ...
2009-01-29 - Case Details
The
Respondent has no license or authorization to use the trademark LEGO; it is not an authorized dealer of the
1 The word “лего” is the Bulgarian translation for “lego”.
2 With reference to the well-known character of the trademark LEGO, see inter alia: LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, WIPO
Case No. D2009-06800; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Kim S J, WIPO Case No.
D2014-0884; and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2023-06-01 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names <lego-blackfriday.shop>, <lego-blackfridays.shop>, and
<lego-blackfriday.store> are registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The Complainant further owns (amongst many others) the domain name which addresses the
official LEGO website (Annex 7 to the Complaint).
The disputed domain name <lego-blackfriday.shop> was registered on November 23, 2023; the disputed
domain names <lego-blackfriday.store> and <lego-blackfridays.shop> were registered on November 24,
2023 (Annex 2 to the Complaint).
...
2024-03-20 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Thai Dang
Case No. D2018-1929
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...From the record in this case, however, Respondent is not an authorized reseller, distributor, or other service provider offering legitimate LEGO products. Rather, the evidence supports a finding that Respondent is aware of the LEGO brand, and is using a confusingly similar domain name to direct Internet users to a website purporting within its title to sell “Cheap Lego clones, Lego bootlegs, fake Legos or bootlegos” intended to mimic legitimate LEGO products. ...
2018-11-01 - Case Details
See LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692 (“The Panel finds that the Complainant has established that LEGO and LEGOLAND are well-recognized and world famous trademarks and that the trademarks are distinctive”); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. Admin Hostmaster,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-12-28 - Case Details
D2009-0381; LEGO Juris A/S v. Zhijun Guo,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0184; LEGO Juris A/S v. P N S Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Palmer,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1826; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-04-06 - Case Details
Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840, LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260, and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hasings Jr.,
WIPO Case No. ...D2008-1715 (“The Panel finds it established that the trademark LEGO is well-known”), LEGO Juris A/S v. M. Moench,
WIPO Case No. DNL2009-0052 (“Complainant has established that the LEGO trademark has acquired a high reputation and should be considered as well-recognized and world famous”), and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-11-25 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Zhangming Li
Case No. D2020-2350
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established it has rights in the LEGO trade mark. The LEGO trade mark is without doubt a well-known trade mark. The LEGO trade mark has been reproduced in its entirety in the disputed domain name and is easily identifiable. ...
2020-11-03 - Case Details