About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United Republic of Tanzania

TZ018-j

Back

Kenafric Industries Limited v Lakairo Investment Group Co Limited and another, Miscellaneous Application No. 279 of 2018, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Kenafric Industries Ltd v Lakairo Investment Group Co Ltd and Another, Miscellaneous Application 279 of 2018, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Magoiga, J.

Date of Ruling: June 28, 2019

Facts

The applicant, a registered proprietor of the trade mark known as “Special Veve” in Kenya, was in the process of registering “Special Veve” at the African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO). Registration with ARIPO would entitle the applicant to universal protection in all member states of ARIPO, including Tanzania. The applicant was also a registered proprietor of the trade marks “Pipi Kifua” and “Orange Drops” in Tanzania. The applicant discovered that the respondents were manufacturing and selling bubblegum and sweets, one known as “Super Veve,” and two other products with the same name as the applicant’s trade marks. The applicant sued the respondents for infringement of trade marks and sought a temporary injunction to restrain the respondents from continuing the production, supply, and sale of products infringing its trade marks.

Holding

A court cannot determine the question of balance of convenience between the parties before making a determination on disputed trade marks and their ownership.

Decision

There were triable issues between the parties relating to the registered owner of the trade marks and uses of the names “Super” and “Special.” There would be no irreparable injury to the plaintiff because the injury that it would have suffered was quantified and could be recovered from the defendant in the form of damages.