About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions Build Back Fund National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Japan

JP099-j

Back

1969(A)2117, Keishu Vol.25, No.5, at 739

Date of Judgment: July 20,1971

 

Issuing Authority: Supreme Court

 

Level of the Issuing Authority: Final Instance

 

Type of Procedure: Judicial (Criminal)

 

Subject Matter: Trademarks

 

Main text of the judgment (decision):

The final appeal shall be dismissed.

 

Reasons:

From among the grounds for the final appeal according to Appellant's attorney, ●●●●, the point made about violation of Article 31 of the Constitution constitutes, in substance, entirely an assertion about a factual error or mere violation of law, and the point made about violation of a legal precedent concerns citing of a legal precedent which is not appropriate for the present case due to the subject covered, and other points of the gist of the argument concern assertions about factual errors, mere violation of law, and inappropriateness of sentencing, so that none of them constitutes lawful grounds for the final appeal (in the case of possession, without legitimate authority, of goods affixed with a registered trademark on the packaging for designated goods for the purpose of selling the same, if the content is the trademark right holder's own product and, furthermore, the content is new, such possession shall not have any influence on the establishment of a crime according to Article 37, item (ii) and Article 78 of the Trademark Act, and next, even if the packaging has no aesthetic element in particular, and even if the packaging is mainly for protecting the goods for transportation, a cardboard box, as a container for the product, constitutes the "packaging of goods" as stipulated in Article 37, item (ii) of the same Act, and it should not be considered necessary that the act stipulated in the same items of the same Article is always conducted as a business. Accordingly, the rulings made by the court of prior instance, whose purport is the same as the above, are entirely justified.)

Therefore, the judgment of this court is rendered unanimously by all judges, as per the main text, by application of Articles 414, and Article 386, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

(This translation is provisional and subject to revision.)