About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships AI Tools & Services The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA UPOV e-PVP Administration UPOV e-PVP DUS Exchange Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO Translate Speech-to-Text Classification Assistant Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

United Republic of Tanzania

TZ030-j

Back

Sabuni Detergents Limited and another v Haroon Daud Abdulla and others, Commercial Case No. 46 of 2006, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Sabuni Detergents Ltd. and another v Haroon Daud Abdulla and others, Commercial Case No. 46 of 2006, High Court of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Dar es Salaam

Mjasiri, J.

Date of Judgment: January 22, 2007

Facts

The plaintiffs filed this lawsuit, alleging trademark infringement and passing off of their products. The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, general and specific damages, and a court order for delivery and destruction of the offending products. The defendants raised two preliminary objections: (1) the court does not have territorial jurisdiction to hear the suit regarding the third defendant, Turkey Company Limited, a LTD incorporated in Zanzibar, and (2) the suit is barred by res judicata after the parties settled the case in Commercial Case No. 100 of 2003. The first and third plaintiffs were not parties to the aforementioned commercial case. In Commercial Case No. 100 of 2003, the second plaintiff to this case sued the defendant to restrain them from infringing the plaintiff’s registered trade mark no. 22645 ("GIV SOAPS"). On May 14, 2004, the parties entered into a settlement agreement to cease the manufacture of any soap bearing the trade mark "GIV BEAUTY SOAP."

Holdings

(i) Under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, plaintiffs may file suit either where the defendants reside or where a cause of action arises. If the infringement was alleged to have taken place in Dar es Salaam, then this court has territorial jurisdiction.

(ii) Res judicata applies when (a) the identity of the matter at issue is directly and substantially the same that was at issue in a previous suit, (b) between the same parties, (c) under the same title, (d) in a competent court, and (e) heard and finally decided in a former suit. Res judicata bars a claim of such a nature that could have been joined in the first action.

(iii) The trade mark at issue in both cases is the trade mark "GIV BEAUTY SOAP." The second defendant was distributing products manufactured by the third defendant. The claims arose from the same issue of infringement.

(iv) A court settlement agreement has the binding force of res judicata.

Decision

This court has territorial jurisdiction over the case. Although the third defendant was not a party to the prior suit, the second defendant claimed to have been using the trade mark under a royalty agreement entered into with the third defendant, the registered holder of the trade mark. This case is dismissed with costs, per res judicata.