About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Andean Community

CAN095-j

Back

Interpretación Prejudicial 443-IP-2015, el derecho preferente derivado de una acción de cancelación de marca y derecho derivado de una solicitud de registro presentada con antelación. [Signos involucrados MR. POLLO, MAS SABOR (denominativo) y SEÑOR POLLO EL ORIGINAL POLLO A LA LEÑA (mixto)]



TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LA COMUNIDAD ANDINA

Proceso:                                443-IP-2015

 

Asunto:                                 Interpretación Prejudicial

 

Consultante:                         INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE DEFENSA DE LA COMPETENCIA Y DE LA PROTECCIÓN DE LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL (INDECOPI) DE LA REPÚBLICA DEL PERÚ

 

Expediente interno

del Consultante:                   598223-2014

 

Referencia:                            Signos involucrados MR. POLLO, MAS SABOR (denominativo) y SEÑOR POLLO EL ORIGINAL POLLO A LA LEÑA (mixto)

 

Normas a ser

interpretadas:                       Artículo 168 de la Decisión 486 de la Comisión de la Comunidad Andina

 

Temas objeto de

interpretación:                      1.  Derecho preferente originado en la cancelación por no uso de una marca registrada

                                               2.  El derecho preferente derivado de una acción de cancelación de marca y derecho derivado de una solicitud de registro presentada con antelación

 

Magistrado Ponente:           Dr. Hernán Romero Zambrano