About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay WIPO Wallet WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP & Innovation Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight
Arabic English Spanish French Russian Chinese
Laws Treaties Judgments Browse By Jurisdiction

Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan [2017]: Mobile Telecom-Service LLP and the Referential Use of Kcell and Active Marks, Case No. 6001-17-00-6C/191, Kazakhstan

Back This judgment is a part of the following collection(s): 2026 WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum Date of Judgment October 12, 2017 Issuing Authority Supreme Court Level of the Issuing Authority Final Instance Type of Procedure Judicial (Administrative) Subject Matter Trademarks Plaintiff/Appellant Committee on Regulation of Natural Monopolies, Protection of Competition and Consumer Rights, Ministry of National Economy Defendant/Respondent Mobile Telecom-Service LLP Keywords
Unfair competition, Consumer confusion, Referential use, Use of a third party’s trademark, Advertising
Judgment/Decision English Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan [2017]: Mobile Telecom-Service LLP and the Referential Use of Kcell and Active Marks, Case No. 6001-17-00-6C/191  HTML Additional Documents English 2026 WIPO IP Judges Forum Informal Case Summary –Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan [2017]: Mobile Telecom-Service LLP and the Referential Use of Kcell and Active Marks, Case No. 6001-17-00-6C/191  HTML Relevant Legislation Relevant Treaties WIPO Lex No. KZ002-j