2026 WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum

Promoting transnational dialogue among judiciaries

The annual WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum aims to provide a platform for judges from across the globe to exchange their expertise on the most pressing intellectual property (IP) challenges raised by accelerating innovation and the increasingly transnational use of IP.

The 2026 WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum will be held on October 14 and 15, 2026. This page will continue to be updated with further details on the program, the speakers and information for participants.

The WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum is an annual event organized by the WIPO Judicial Institute as part of the Organization’s work with the judiciaries.

October 14–15, 2026

Location: Geneva, Switzerland

Hybrid meeting

List of Participants [PDF]

Program for the 2026 WIPO Intellectual Property Judges Forum

Day one – October 14, 2026

Registration (8.00 – 9.00)

Opening (9.00 – 9.15)

Name
Title

Name
Title

Name
Title

Name
Title

Name
Title

Name
Title

Session 1: IP and Artificial Intelligence (AI) (9.15 – 10.15)

  • Copyright eligibility of works generated with the assistance of AI
  • Generative AI outputs and infringement of copyright or personality rights
  • Liability for use of infringing AI-generated outputs
  • Misappropriation of trade secrets involving AI technologies and the burden of proof

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Savvas S. Papasavvas

President, General Court of the European Union, Luxembourg

José Carlos Costa Netto
Judge, Court of Appeal of São Paulo, Brazil

Du Weike
Deputy Chief Judge, Intellectual Property Court, Supreme People's Court, Beijing, China

Luis Edwin Molinar Rohana
President, Specialized Intellectual Property Chamber, Federal Court of Administrative Justice, Mexico City, Mexico

Aleksandra Ziółkowska-Majkowska
Judge, Regional Court in Warsaw, Poland

Name
Title

Reference Judgments:

  • Court of Appeal of Santa Catarina, Brazil [2025]: Spitz Park Aventuras LTDA v Escritório Central de Arrecadação e Distribuição, Case No. 5032376-37.2025.8.24.0000
  • Supreme People’s Court of China [2025]: Company A v Company B (2023) ZGFZMZ No. 1503
  • Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, Second Chamber, Mexico [2025]: Amparo Directo 6/2025

Coffee Break (10.15 – 10.45) 

Featured Speaker on AI and Court Proceedings (11.00 – 11.30)

Session 2: AI and Court Proceedings (10.45 – 12.30)

  • Emerging AI uses to enhance judicial efficiency – research, transcription, evidence analysis, drafting and case management
  • Principles for AI use in justice systems – human rights, fairness, reliability, transparency and human oversight
  • Preserving human judgment and setting clear limits on automation in adjudication
  • Good practices, guidelines and lessons from early-adopter jurisdictions
  • Future outlook – online courts and redesigned court procedures

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Stephen Burley

Justice, Federal Court, Sydney, Australia

Timur Abdramanov
Judge, Tashkent Regional Court, Uzbekistan

Victor Diz Torres
Judge, 7th Business Court, Court of Justice of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Army Ferreira
Judge, Constitutional Court, Santo Domingo Oeste, Dominican Republic

Dedar Singh Gill
High Court Judge, Supreme Court, Singapore

Lee Sookyeon
Justice, Supreme Court, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Prateek Sibal
Programme Specialist, Digital Policies and Digital Transformation Section, Communication and Information Sector, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris, France

Reference Materials:

Lunch Break (12.30 – 14.30)

Optional: Fundamentals of AI Technology, Room B (13.30 – 14.30)

Ryan Groves
Senior Expert, Copyright Management Division, Copyright and Creative Industries Sector, WIPO

Special Guest Speaker on Synthetic Media and Digital Evidence (14.30 – 15.00)

  • Practical introduction to the creation and detection of AI-generated synthetic media
  • Forensic tools and techniques to assess the authenticity and reliability of digital evidence
  • Obtaining and evaluating independent digital-forensic expert evidence in legal proceedings, including its cost, accessibility and evidentiary value

Zeno Geradts
Senior Forensic Scientist, Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, Netherlands

Reference Article:

  • Van Lierop, S., Najdenkoska, I., Worring, M., Geradts, Z. [2026]. Interpol review of detection of AI-generated image and video deepfakes, 2022-2025. Forensic Science International: Synergy, Volume 13

Session 3: Copyright and AI Model Training (15.00 – 15.45)

  • Whether acts of reproduction under copyright law occur during training
  • Unauthorized reproduction of protected works or databases and potentially applicable exceptions, e.g. fair use, fair dealing, and text-and-data mining
  • Dataset provenance, transparency, and discovery challenges
  • Evaluating economic impact, licensing markets, and remedies

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Daniel J. Gervais

Milton R. Underwood Professor of Law (Emeritus), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States of America; Senior Associate Professor (part-time), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands

Elke Schwager
Presiding Judge, 42nd Civil Chamber, Munich I Regional Court, Germany

Prathiba M. Singh
Justice, High Court of Delhi, New Delhi, India

Reference Judgments:

  • Munich I Regional Court, Germany [2025]: GEMA v OpenAI, Case No. 42 O 14139/24
  • Munich I Regional Court, Germany [2026]: GEMA v Suno, Case No. 42 O 763/25
  • High Court of Delhi, India [2026]: ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Case No. CS(COMM) 1028/2024, I.A. 45300/2024
  • United States District Court for the Northern District of California [2025]: Bartz v Anthropic PBC, 787 F.Supp.3d 1007 
  • United States District Court for the Northern District of California [2025]: Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 788 F.Supp.3d 1026

Coffee Break (15.45 – 16.15)

Session 4: Software and Digital Technology Patents (16.15 – 17.30)

  • Boundaries of subject-matter eligibility in computer-implemented inventions and their relationship with other patentability requirements
  • Technical contribution requirements for computer program claims and their applicability to AI-based inventions
  • Next generation digital technologies

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Caroline Somesom Tauk

Judge, Regional Federal Court of the Second Region, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Mélanie Bessaud
Judge-referee, Court of Cassation, Paris, France; Judge, Munich Central Division, Unified Patent Court

Angela Furlanetto
Justice, Federal Court, Ottawa, Canada

Richard Hacon
Presiding Judge, Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, London, United Kingdom

Martin Müller
Chair, Technical Board of Appeal, Boards of Appeal, European Patent Office, European Patent Organisation, Munich, Germany

Reference Judgments:

  • Ninth Federal Court of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [2024]: Case No. 5024418-78.2019.4.02.5101
  • Federal Court of Canada [2020]: Choueifaty v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 837
  • Federal Court of Appeal of Canada [2011]: Amazon.com, Inc. v Canada (Attorney General), 2011 FCA 328
  • Federal Court of Appeal of Canada [2023]: Canada (Attorney General) v Benjamin Moore & Co., 2023 FCA 168
  • Court of Appeal of Paris, France [2025]: Case No. 23/07392
  • Supreme Court of the United Kingdom [2026]: Emotional Perception AI Ltd. v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, [2026] UKSC 3
  • Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office [2022]: Case No. T 0702/20 – Sparsely connected neural network/MITSUBISHI
  • Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office [2021]: Case No. G 0001/19 – Pedestrian Simulation

Group photo to be followed by Reception (17.30)
 

Day 2 – October 15, 2026

Session 5: IP at the Apex Courts (9.00 – 9.45)

  • The contribution of apex courts to legal certainty, access to justice and public confidence in the IP system
  • Reconciling specialist IP doctrine with general legal principles and public interest considerations
  • Perspectives on evolving judicial approaches to new technologies in IP litigation

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Mohammad ElZend

Vice President, Tanta High Court of Appeals; Senior Counsellor, International Cooperation Department, Ministry of Justice, Cairo, Egypt 

Klaus Bacher
Presiding Judge, Tenth Civil Panel, Federal Court of Justice, Karlsruhe, Germany

Satish Chandra Sharma
Justice, Supreme Court, New Delhi, India

Maria Filomena D. Singh
Associate Justice, Supreme Court, Manila, Philippines

Session 6: Comparative, Referential and Expressive Use of Trademarks (9.45 – 11.00)

  • Use of third-party trademarks in comparative advertising and other promotional contexts, including labels and packaging
  • Referential or nominative use of a third-party trademark, including to identify products or indicate their characteristics, compatibility or intended purpose 
  • Balancing trademark rights, fair competition, consumer protection, and freedom of expression

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Rebecca Ellis

Justice, Court of Appeal, Wellington, New Zealand

Kürşat Ayaz
Rapporteur Judge, General Assembly of Civil Chambers, Court of Cassation, Ankara, Türkiye

Luis Antonio Camargo Vergara
Judge, Third Superior Court of Justice, First Judicial District, Panama City, Panama

Sandra Catalina Charris Rebellón
Judge, Court of Justice of the Andean Community, Quito, Ecuador

Zhanar Duisenova
Judge, Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of Astana, Kazakhstan

Reference Judgments:

  • Specialized Interdistrict Administrative Court of Astana, Kazakhstan [2026]: Citizen B v Ministry, Case No. 7194-25-00-4/4564
  • Court of Appeal of New Zealand [2025]: Zuru New Zealand Limited and ors v Lego Juris A/S and anor, [2025] NZCA 650
  • Third Superior Court of Justice, First Judicial District, Panama [2024]: Productos Alimenticios Pascual, S.A. v Jonzac Properties, Inc. and H. Tzanetatos, Inc.
  • Court of Cassation, 11th Civil Chamber, Türkiye [2025]: Case No. E. 2024/6592, K. 2025/4126 K
  • Court of Justice of the Andean Community [2023]: Preliminary Ruling 75-IP-2021

Coffee Break (11.00 – 11.30)

Session 7: Online Platforms and Intermediary Liability for IP Infringement (11.30 – 12.45)

  • Criteria for direct and indirect/secondary liability of online platforms for infringement and unfair competition
  • Scope and availability of safe-harbor exclusions
  • Online marketplaces and counterfeit goods – obligations and liability exposure relating to seller vetting, listing design, advertisement, payment and logistics
  • Social media platforms and user-generated content – obligations and liability exposure relating to hosting, content moderation and proactive monitoring
  • Negotiation and remuneration mandates for online use of press publications by digital platforms
  • Injunctive remedies, including site blocking, dynamic injunctions and staydown orders 

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Jean-Christophe Gayet

Presiding Judge, Third Section, Third Chamber, First Instance Court of Paris, France

Guillermo D. González Zurro
Judge, National Court of Civil Appeals, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Küllike Jürimäe
Judge, Court of Justice of the European Union, Luxembourg

Pavel Tůma
Presiding Judge, Panel of the Civil and Commercial Division, Supreme Court, Brno, Czech Republic

Woo Sungyop
Presiding Judge, Fourth Division, Intellectual Property High Court, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Reference Judgments:

  • National Civil Court of Appeals of Argentina, Chamber M [2022]: Iglesia Mesiánica Mundial Sekai Kyusei Kyo en la Argentina v Mercado Libre S.A. and others, Case No. 64627/2007
  • Supreme Court of the Czech Republic [2021]: Hellspy, Case No. 23 Cdo 2793/2020
  • First Instance Court of Paris, Third Chamber, France [2024]: Groupe Lucien Barrière v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, RG No. 24/02349
  • Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea [2012]: 2010Ma817
  • Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea [2019]: 2016Da271608
  • Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) [2026]: Meta Platforms Ireland Limited v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, Case No. C-797/23

Lunch Break (12.45 – 14.15)

Optional: WIPO Lex Demonstration, Room B (13.15 – 14.15)

Ty Gray
Head, WIPO Lex, WIPO Judicial Institute

WIPO’s Work with Judiciaries (14.15 – 14.45)

Min Eun-Joo
Director, WIPO Judicial Institute

Session 8: Cross-border Aspects of IP Disputes (14.45 – 15.45)

  • Private international law and IP – determination of competent jurisdiction and applicable law
  • Managing parallel proceedings pending in different jurisdictions
  • Territoriality of IP rights and infringement involving acts across different jurisdictions
  • Territorial scope of injunctions and other remedies

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Bart van den Broek

Judge, Third Panel, Court of Appeal, Unified Patent Court, Luxembourg

Iwai Naoyuki
Presiding Judge, IP Division, Tokyo District Court, Japan

Oliver Schön
Presiding Judge, 7th Civil Chamber, Munich I Regional Court, Germany

Mustapher Mohamed Siyani
Principal Judge, High Court, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania

Reference Judgments:

  • Munich I Regional Court, Germany [2025]: Case No. 7 O 16055/24
  • Supreme Court of Japan [2025]: Case No. 2023 (Ju) 14 and 15
  • Court of Appeal of the United Republic of Tanzania [2025]: Lakairo Industries Group Co. Limited & 2 others v Kenafrica Industries Limited & 2 others, Civil Appeal No. 593 of 2022 [2025] TZCA 999
  • Court of Appeal, Unified Patent Court [2026]: Adobe Inc. et al. v Keeex SAS, UPC-CoA-922/2025, UPC-CoA-923/2025, UPC-CoA-924/2025, UPC-CoA-925/2025

Coffee Break (15.45 – 16.15)

Session 9: Specialized Procedural Rules for IP Disputes (16.15 – 17.45)

  • Judicial Structures and Procedural Rules for Intellectual Property Disputes: A Comparative Report
  • Case management rules or guidelines specific to IP disputes, including pre hearing conferences
  • Specialized rules for evidence, including types of evidence, submission, discovery and experts
  • Bifurcated procedure for invalidity and infringement disputes
  • Simplified or fast-track procedures
  • Coordination of regional and national legal frameworks

Moderator and Speakers:

Moderator:
Duncan Matthews

Professor of Intellectual Property Law, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

Michael D. Manson
Justice, Federal Court, Ottawa, Canada

Wilfrid Vivien Obambi
Judge, Court of Appeal, Dolisie, Congo

Leonard P. Stark
Circuit Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Washington, D.C., United States of America

Francis Tuiyott
Justice, Court of Appeal, Nairobi, Kenya

Yan Jing
Presiding Judge, Third Civil Division, Supreme People’s Court, Beijing, China

Reference Materials:

  • Canada [2025]: Federal Courts Rules, Summary Judgment and Summary Trial, Rules 213-219; Case Management and Dispute Resolution Services, Rules 380-391
  • China [2020]: Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation concerning Intellectual Property Rights
  • High Court of Brazzaville, Congo [2025]: Ministère Public and Société Inter Trade SARL v Houssein Adellahi, Aliou Niangadou, Aboudoulaye Teme, and Abdul Karim Haidara, Judgment No. 179
  • Kenya [2022]: Industrial Property Tribunal Rules
  • Kenya [2022]: High Court (Organization and Administration) (General) Rules
  • United States of America [2025]: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56 on Summary Judgment
  • Matthews, D. and Padamczyk, M. [2026]. Judicial Structures and Procedural Rules for Intellectual Property Disputes: A Comparative Report. World Intellectual Property Organization

Closing (17.45)

Prathiba M. Singh
Justice, High Court of Delhi, New Delhi, India; Chair of the WIPO Advisory Board of Judges

Min Eun-Joo
Director, WIPO Judicial Institute

Previous editions of the Forum

In 2025, the Forum brought together over 520 judges from 95 countries and five regional courts to engage with their global peers. The program focused on emerging issues across several of the most established areas of intellectual property law, including industrial designs, pharmaceutical patents, trademarks, and copyright related rights. Discussions also addressed personality rights and challenges related to the digital environment, including artificial intelligence. Cross-cutting issues surrounding evidence, damages calculations, and criminal enforcement were also featured.