The Respondent is Jennifer Scifo, Codersfx.com, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Panel finds the entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the
disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2023-12-11 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Tariq Rashid, JSK TRADING LLC, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-01-30 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is City Cycle, Inc. of United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Network Solutions, LLC.
3. ...The communication went on to state that, while the Respondent was not sure of the value of the domain name, a “Value Assessment Tool” on the Registrar's website valued the domain name at USD25,000.00.” ...
2009-03-31 - Datos del caso
The Domain Name is nearly identical to RapidShare's mark, and is being used in conjunction with related services (citing Facebook Inc. v. ...iii) The Respondent is using the Domain Name to enable copyright infringement of copyright materials owned by third parties. Such a use in violation of established public policy is a bad faith use of the Domain Name (citing Hoffman La-Roche Inc v. ...
2010-06-28 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is 杨智超 (Zhichao Yang), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina (www.net.cn) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trade marks SODEXO and SODEXHO, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2022-03-11 - Datos del caso
CSMRW) of Herbert Grove, Castleroy, Limerick, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is .
The Registrar with which the domain name is registered is Register.Com, Domain Registrar, 575 8th Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018, United States of America.
3. ...While the concept of a domain name being used in bad faith
is not limited to positive action (CUX, Inc. v DomainNamesAvailable WIPO
decision no D2000-0972), here there was indeed active use of the domain
name for some time.
...
2001-11-01 - Datos del caso
The Registrar also forwarded the requested WHOIS details, confirmed that the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy was in effect.
The Registrar has currently incorporated in its agreements the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"). ...Each domain name at issue incorporates the dominating term "t-mobile". Therefore, the domain names must be considered as confusingly similar to the T-Mobile mark.
...
2002-08-29 - Datos del caso
The Center has found that the Complaint satisfies the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy and the Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.
...Judgements of High Courts in India have held that holder of a domain name is entitled to the same protection as in the case of a trade mark. (See Yahoo! Inc v Akash Arora & Another IPLR 1999 April 196 [Delhi High Court]; and Rediff Communication Ltd v Cybarbooth & Another 1999 (3) All MR 164 [Bombay High Court].
...
2001-01-26 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Remi Tonit, United
Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Citing Fifth Third Bancorp v. Secure Whois Information
Service, WIPO Case No. D2006-0696: “the use of a proxy registration service to avoid disclosing the name
and coordinates of the real party in interest is also consistent with an inference of bad faith in registering and
using the Domain Name, given the other evidence in this case of evasive and irresponsible conduct.”
...
2022-03-10 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Sedef Gul of Izmir, Turkey / Elit Medical Dis Tic Ltd Sti of Izmir, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC. ...Neither can the Respondent claim to have a bona fide offering of goods or services, based on the principles laid down in Oki Data Americas, Inc v. ASD, Inc,
WIPO Case No. D2001-0903.
The Complainant, lastly, says that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2015-06-01 - Datos del caso
See Confédération nationale du credit mutual v. Yu Ke Rong,
WIPO Case No. D2018-0948 ().
Complainant also submits that Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name is in bad faith. ...See National Westminster Bank plc v. John Brendan,
WIPO Case No. D2014-2045. Furthermore, prior UDRP panels have categorically held that use of a domain name for phishing, distributing malware or any other type of fraudulent activity can never confer rights or legitimate interests in a domain name. ...
2018-11-16 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Shanshan Huang of Jiangsu, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant has also shown that the Respondent has registered thousands of domain names containing third-party trademarks. The Respondent has not contested this evidence.
The Panel therefore considers that the disputed domain name has been registered primarily for the purpose of selling the domain name to the Complainant for valuable consideration in excess of documented
The Panel notes that the Respondent has been involved in 4 previous USRP cases that resulted in the transfer of the concerning domain names (including, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ...
2019-01-07 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Domain Names incorporate the Complainant’s NUTELLA trademark in its entirety. As numerous UDRP panels have held, incorporating a trademark in its entirety is sufficient to establish that a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...
2022-02-14 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Simon Lundgren of Berlin, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with AE Domain Administration (.aeDA).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the UAE Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for – UAE DRP approved by .aeDA (the “Policy”), the Rules for the UAE Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy - UAE DRP (the “Rules”), and the Supplemental Rules for UAE Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy - UAE DRP (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-05-26 - Datos del caso
Croatia Airlines d.d. v. Modern Empire Internet Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0455.
The Complainant has made a prima facie case that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the domain name. ...It is most likely that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant, and the trade-marks, when the Respondent registered the domain name.
The Panel agrees with the decision rendered in Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin, Maison Fondée en 1772 v. ...
2010-01-29 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is yusuf kaplan, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant is of the opinion that the disputed domain name is identical to its CMA CGM trademark.
It further argues that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain
name.
...
2023-07-24 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is GB Apps, Apps.Pk, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...See also WhatsApp, Inc. v. Nasser
Bahaj, WIPO Case No. D2016-0581 ( et al.).
The Panel therefore finds that the Respondent does not have rights or legitimate interests in the disputed
domain name.
...
2024-08-23 - Datos del caso
Respondent is Luchtsport Centrum Overijssel, the Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with SIDN through Hostnet B.V.
3. ...Respondent is also not commonly known by the Domain Name.
According to Complainant, the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2021-07-23 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...In accordance with established practice, the top level domain portion, “.com”, may be ignored in comparing a domain name with a trade mark (e.g., see Gerling Beteiligungs – GmbH (GBG) v. ...
2008-09-23 - Datos del caso
On the question of identity or confusing similarity, what is required is simply a visual or aural comparison and
assessment of the disputed domain name itself to the Complainant’s trade marks: see for example,
GlobalCenter Pty Ltd v. Global Domain Hosting Pty Ltd, WIPO Case No. ...The ultimate burden of proof,
however, remains with the Complainant. See e.g., GlobalCenter Pty Ltd v. Global Domain Hosting Pty Ltd,
supra.
It is not in dispute between the Parties that neither the Complainant nor its licensor (Société Civile Phoenix)
have authorised the Respondent to use ARSENE in the disputed domain name. ...
2024-09-27 - Datos del caso