The Complainant states that the previous holder of the disputed domain name provided links to other manufacturers and distributors of furniture on the website linked to the disputed domain name and offered to sell the disputed domain name for USD 14,000. ...Reverse Domain Name Hijacking is defined under the UDRP Rules as “using the UDRP in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain-name holder of a domain name”.
...
2014-02-05 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Conduct such as that exhibited by Respondent has since the earliest days of the Policy been found to constitute bad faith. See, e.g., United States Olympic Committee v. MIC,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0189 (“the act of registering and then offering to sell a domain name supports a determination of bad faith”) (punctuation omitted).
...
2010-11-19 - Datos del caso
Kieran Ambrose, Cyberbit A/S of Fyn, Denmark.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the “Domain Name”), is registered with Name.com LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...If abuse is apparent on the face of the case papers, the Panel is under an obligation to declare it. See Goway Travel Limited v. Tourism Australia,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0344 (“The Rules specifically put the burden on the Panel to determine whether a complainant has tried to use the Policy in bad faith to attempt to deprive a registered domain name holder of a domain name.”). ...
2016-03-07 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is The Trustee for Guillet Family Trust, Australia, internally represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Web Address Registration Pty Ltd.
3. ...Nor is the Respondent commonly known by the disputed domain name.
The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The disputed domain name has the effect of preventing the Complainants from reflecting their mark in a corresponding domain name. ...
2021-01-28 - Datos del caso
Further, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent is using each disputed domain name to redirect to a
commercial landing page that indicates the disputed domain name “may be for sale” and displays a
telephone number for users to verify the disputed domain name is for sale and to facilitate the purchase.
...See
Parfums Christian Dior v. Javier Garcia Quintas and Christiandior.net, WIPO Case No. D2000-0226.
Further, the Respondent is using each disputed domain name to redirect to a commercial landing page that
indicates the disputed domain name “may be for sale”. ...
2023-01-30 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Proof of demonstrable preparations to use a disputed domain name does not require a showing of “a fully operational business.” DigiPoll Ltd. v. Raj Kumar,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-08-04 - Datos del caso
A related domain name , also registered to an Andrew Wisdom, was the subject of a previous UDRP proceeding commenced by Complainant, which resulted in a determination in favor of a transfer of the disputed domain name, see Idle Media, Inc. v. ...Moreover, Complainant argues that Respondent registered the disputed domain name to prevent Complainant from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name and has engaged in a pattern of such conduct, as shown by Respondent's registration of two domain names incorporating the DATPIFF mark (the currently disputed domain name and the previously disputed domain name ).
...
2017-05-01 - Datos del caso
Rights or Legitimate Interests
It is for the Complainant to establish, at least prima facie that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name (Croatia Airlines d.d. v. Modern Empire Internet Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0455; Belupo d.d. v. ...This use cannot give rise to rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name (DivX, LLC v. PrivacyProtect.org / Gerente de Dominia, CSRUS Enterprises,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0600).
...
2012-05-07 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is 陈龙 (chen long), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Xin Net Technology Corp. ...In cases where a domain name
incorporates the entirety of a trade mark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is
page 4
recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that
mark for purposes of UDRP standing. ...
2023-12-01 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Chen Changlan, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Gname.com Pte. ...The generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) “.com” in the disputed domain name does not
eliminate the overall notion that the designations are connected to the trade mark and the likelihood of
confusion that the disputed domain name and the trade mark are associated;
page 3
(b) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...
2023-04-12 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Seyed Amir Shahab Soleimani, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <7eleven.ir> (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with IRNIC.
3. ...This shows that the Respondent was well aware of the Complainant’s trademark at the time of registering the Disputed Domain Name and he proceeded with the registration of the Disputed Domain Name.
In addition, the Complainant’s 7-ELEVEN trademark is well known as it has been recognized by previous decisions under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) (see 7-Eleven, Inc. v. ...
2020-10-07 - Datos del caso
In Kleinwort Benson Private Bank v. Designbureau Ltd,,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0158 (April 19, 2007) the panel held that the respondent “Designbureau Ltd,” had no rights or legitimate interests and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. ...Further there is evidence of the Respondent having engaged in a pattern of acquiring domain names in order to prevent trademark owners from reflecting their marks in a corresponding domain name (see previous panel decision Kleinwort Benson Private Bank Limited v. ...
2007-10-01 - Datos del caso
In line with such provision, the Complainant must prove that it enjoys the trademark right, and that the disputed domain name is identical with or confusingly similar to its trademark or service mark.
It is established that the specific top level of a domain name such as “.com”, “.org” or “.net” does not affect the domain name for the purpose of determining whether it is identical or confusingly similar (Magnum Piercing, Inc. v. ...The subject domain name differs from the Complainant’s name and mark only by the addition of the country code top level domain “tv”. ...
2008-03-17 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Milen Radumilo, Romania.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Sole Panelist
Date: August 1, 2022
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. v. Milen Radumilo
Case No. D2022-2145
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2022-08-12 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is 冯国豪 (feng guo hao), China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina
(www.net.cn) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In this regard, the Panel finds that holding a domain name passively, without making any use of it,
also does not confer any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name on the Respondent (see
in this regard earlier UDRP decisions such as Bollore SE v. ...
2022-07-05 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Felipe Agudelo, asegurance qs, Colombia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2025-07-18 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Raj kumar, Raj kumar, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. ...Panels have moreover found the following types of evidence to support a finding that a respondent has
registered a domain name to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to its website by creating a
likelihood of confusion with the complainant’s mark: (i) actual confusion, (ii) seeking to cause confusion
(including by technical means beyond the domain name itself) for the respondent’s commercial benefit, even
if unsuccessful, (iii) the lack of a respondent’s own rights to or legitimate interests in a domain name,
(iv) redirecting the domain name to a different respondent-owned website, even where such website contains
a disclaimer, (v) redirecting the domain name to or mimicking the complainant’s (or a competitor’s) website,
and (vi) absence of any conceivable good faith use. ...
2026-03-23 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...Moreover, it is clearly established that the Respondent was undoubtedly aware,
at the time of registration of the domain name in dispute, of the Complainant's
Trademarks (see Volvo Trademark Holding AB v. Cosmos1, WIPO
Case No. ...
2004-04-19 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Lasco Maxim of Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The use of the Domain Name for a pay-per-click website, containing links to websites with information on goods competing with those of the Complainant does not constitute "a bona fide offering of goods or services", nor a "legitimate noncommercial or fair use" (see Sanofi v. ...
2015-10-26 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Internet users would reasonably associate the disputed domain name with Complainant and its products. The disputed domain name incorporates RED and RED ONE and adds the term “camera”. ...
2011-04-07 - Datos del caso