The Respondent is Anar Jafarov, Personal use, Ukraine.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...case=D2022-1028
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
MMDSmart LTD v. Anar Jafarov, Personal use
Case No. D2024-3898
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. ...
2024-11-21 - Datos del caso
Customer 1247361676, Canada / G.JC, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...UDRP panels widely agree that incorporating a trademark into a domain name can be sufficient to establish that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark for purpose of the Policy (see, e.g., Uniroyal Engineered Products, Inc. v. ...
2021-07-19 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Bo Wang, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-06-02 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Yakup Yaman, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...In this regard, the Panel particularly believes that the Respondent cannot be assessed as a legitimate dealer
for the Complainant’s products in light of Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ASD, Inc., WIPO Case No. D2001-0903
(“Oki Data”) and thus is not entitled to use the disputed domain name accordingly. ...
2026-02-23 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Richard Doyle, of Celbridge, County Kildare, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IE Domain Registry Limited.
3. ...Compare Freni Brembo S.p.A. v. Webs We Weave,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1717, where an authorized distributor of complainant’s trademarked brakes who registered and used a domain name incorporating the trademark to point to a website that marketed primarily complainant’s brakes, and only occasionally products manufactured by complainant’s competitors, was allowed to retain the domain name.”
...
2008-02-09 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Gideon Kimbrell of Fortine, Montana, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...Irina v. Savelieva
Sole Panelist
Dated: November 7, 2010
1 However, the Panel would like to note that it does not accept the Complainant’s argument that the Respondent has no legitimate interest in the disputed domain name due to the fact that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name to prevent the Complainant from reflecting the PLAVIX trademark in the corresponding domain name. ...
2010-11-19 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Kacey Kling, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a
PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution
Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
(the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-09-28 - Datos del caso
Davis as
their authorized representative.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is (the “Disputed
Domain Name”). ...These are:
(i) Respondent’s Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to the Domain Name; and
(iii) Respondent’s Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2004-09-27 - Datos del caso
For instance, if a registrant intends to profit from the descriptive element of a domain name without intending to take advantage of a third party’s rights. However, as the panel noted in Paris Hilton v. Deepak Kumar,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1364, if the registrant of the domain name is using it in order “…to unfairly capitalise upon or otherwise take advantage of a similarity with another’s mark then such use would not provide the registrant with a right or legitimate interest in the domain name (see, for example, the decision of the three member panel in Express Scripts, Inc. v. ...
2013-02-14 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...In this connection, Complainant cites decisions under the Policy where use of a domain name to attract users for commercial gain has been held to constitute bad faith use. Namely, Hilton Group plc v Forum LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-01-13 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is van boone, lotusbakeries, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Squarespace Domains II LLC (the
“Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2025-09-02 - Datos del caso
page 2
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant prevailed in a previous UDRP proceeding against the Respondent 杨智超 (Zhichao Yang) -
Artemis Marketing Corp. v. 杨智超 (Yang Zhi Chao a/k/a Zhichao Yang), WIPO Case No. D2021-3157 – in
which the panel, by decision dated December 18, 2021, ordered the transfer of the domain name
and 10 additional domain names to the Complainant. ...
2023-01-17 - Datos del caso
Ltd.; and .
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name was originally registered, at the time of the Complaint, with DomainCannon.Com LLC. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2009-05-15 - Datos del caso
Limited, London United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Disputed Domain
Name”) is registered with EuroDNS S.A.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2007-05-10 - Datos del caso
The Complainant further alleges that the Respondent’s use of the Domain Name to redirect to another site and its failure to transfer or release the Domain Name also constitute bad faith having registered at least one other domain name under his own name, evinces bad faith as well.
...Furthermore, the Domain Name in question is identical to the Complainant’s own domain name; the only difference between the two is the TLD.
...
2008-07-25 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Cimpress Schweiz GmbH of Zurich, Switzerland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-05-01 - Datos del caso
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The incorporation of such a mark in a domain name renders the disputed domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark. The addition of the word “cosmetic” may even reinforce the impression of an affiliation between the disputed domain name and the Complainant.
...
2007-04-26 - Datos del caso
The Panel further finds that the DPD Trademark is clearly recognizable within the disputed domain name.
Previous panels have held that the inclusion of the DPD Trademark in a disputed domain name with
additional terms does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and
the DPD Trademark for the purpose of the first element in the following cases (see also WIPO Overview 3.0,
section 1.8): : DPDgroup International Services GmbH & Co v. ...Sole Panelist
Date: November 14, 2025
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
DPDgroup International Services GmbH & Co v. stoner bir
Case No. D2025-3704
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2025-11-19 - Datos del caso
The Respondent is Tin Dang, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...O'Farrell
Sole Panelist
Date: October 25, 2024
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
VALENTINO S.p.A. v. Tin Dang
Case No. D2024-3782
1. The Parties
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
3. Procedural History
4. ...
2024-10-29 - Datos del caso
Grant Place, Chicago,
Illinois 60614, U.S.A.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name in dispute is:
The registrar for the disputed domain name is: Register.com, whose address
is 575 8th Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, New York
10018, U.S.A.
3. ...The Respondent had no right to, nor interest in, the
domain name. By using the name to link to a pornographic website, the Respondent
registered and was using the domain name in bad faith.
...
2001-06-14 - Datos del caso