About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 352   document(s)s (0.027 sec)

Rows

<<  <  61 - 80  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0067 for europeanviagra.com html (20 KB)

Here, the Domain Name contains the registered trademark VIAGRA in its entirety. The Domain Name differs from the registered trade mark in that: (a) the word “european”is placed before the registered trademark VIAGRA; and (b) the suffix “.com” is included. ...While the website was reached through the Domain Name, it was headed “European Viagra” and solicited orders under the heading “What is Viagra”. All of these factors combine to indicate that the Domain Name was registered and being used to attract persons seeking to buy genuine Viagra branded medication, and to sell them a competing brand. ...

2005-04-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0056 for overthecounterviagra.com html (12 KB)

The disputed domain name incorporates the mark VIAGRA and is preceded by the words “over the counter”. Patients seeking VIAGRA are likely to assume that the disputed domain name is used for a website to advertise pharmacies where VIAGRA is available “over the counter”, that is to say without a doctor’s prescription or even for a website that sells VIAGRA online. ...The Panel has already found that patients seeking VIAGRA are likely to assume that the disputed domain name is used for a website to advertise pharmacies where VIAGRA is available “over the counter”, that is to say without a doctor’s prescription or even for a website that sells the VIAGRA online. ...

2013-03-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0731 for blu-viagra.com html (26 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant develops and markets sildenafil citrate, an oral medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, under the brand name VIAGRA. The Complainant has used VIAGRA in connection with this product since April 6, 1998, and obtained its first United States trademark registration for VIAGRA on June 2, 1998. ...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the domain name registered by the Respondent is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s VIAGRA mark. C. Rights or Legitimate Interests The record reflects that the Complainant has not licensed or otherwise authorized the Respondent to use the VIAGRA mark. ...

2004-11-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0733 for blueviagra.com, yellowviagra.com html (24 KB)

Factual Background The Complainant develops and markets sildenafil citrate, an oral medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, as VIAGRA. The Complainant has used VIAGRA in connection with this product since April 6, 1998, and obtained its first United States registration for the VIAGRA mark on June 2, 1998. ...Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that VIAGRA is a famous mark that generates worldwide recognition and attention, that the disputed domain names wholly incorporate the VIAGRA mark, and that the disputed domain names thus are confusingly similar to the VIAGRA mark, in which the Complainant has rights. ...

2004-10-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-2202 for viagraindonesia.com html (11 KB)

The Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. The trademark VIAGRA is a world famous trademark. The Respondent is using the disputed domain name to attract and mislead Internet users searching for information about the Complainant and its VIAGRA product. ...The Complainant has shown that it has registered the trademark VIAGRA in a number of jurisdictions, including Indonesia, where the Respondent is domiciled. The Panel also accepts that VIAGRA is a well-known trademark. ...

2015-02-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0463 for myviagra.com html (16 KB)

Complainant asserts that VIAGRA® has been and continues to be highly publicized and that the Viagra trademark is famous throughout the world, especially in the United States. ...The Domain Name was registered on November 27, 2001; 2. The word "Viagra" is a fanciful term, that was coined by Complainant to be used in connection with its product; 3. ...

2002-08-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0793 for viagra-propecia-xenical.com html (24 KB)

The Respondent is #1 Viagra Propecia Xenical & More Online Pharmacy, Orlando, Florida, United States of America.   2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <viagra-propecia-xenical.com> is registered with TierraNet d/b/a DomainDiscover.   3. ...With respect to Policy ¶4(c)(ii), there is no evidence that Respondent is commonly known by the Domain Name. Here, the Respondent identifies itself as #1 Viagra Propecia Xenical & More Online Pharmacy and has registered the domain name <viagra-propecia-xenical.com>. ...

2003-12-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1471 for vgrmalaysia.com, vgrsingapore.com, viagrastock.net html (11 KB)

The Complainant is the registered proprietor of the trademark VIAGRA in numerous countries as well as the trademark VGR. The trademark VGR is registered in 6 countries including the US and China. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name is made up of the registered trademark VIAGRA, the generic term "stock" and the gTLD ".net". The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the registered trademark VIAGRA. ...

2015-11-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0751 for viagra-xenical-pharmacy.com html (15 KB)

The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name <viagra-xenical-pharmacy.com> is registered with Direct Information Pvt Ltd d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com.   3. ...The Panel notes that this results in the transfer to the Complainant of a domain name that includes the trademark VIAGRA, which the Panel understands is owned by Pfizer Inc. that is not a party to the current proceeding. ...

2006-08-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-1699 for 1-stop-viagra-zyban-xenical-shop.com html (17 KB)

The disputed domain name incorporates the term “xenical”, in addition to the words “viagra”, “zyban”, “1”, “stop” and “shop”. With regard to the addition of the words “viagra” and “zyban”, in Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. #1 Viagra Propecia Xenical & More Online Pharmacy, WIPO Case No. ...The Panel agrees with these decisions and finds that the addition of the words “viagra” and “zyban” does not affect the confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and the Complainant’s mark XENICAL. ...

2008-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2460 for viagraconnect.com html (10 KB)

No. 2,162,548 for the mark VIAGRA, which was issued on June 2, 1998. More recently, the Complainant has developed an intent to use the mark VIAGRA CONNECT, for which it filed an application to register in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on August 15, 2017. ...In this case, the disputed domain name contains the Complainant's trademark VIAGRA in its entirety. The additional word "connect" in this context does not distinguish the disputed domain name from the Complainant's mark. ...

2018-02-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-2479 for vgrsingapore.net html (10 KB)

Respondent has used the URL associated with the disputed domain name to resolve to a website that offers for sale “our quality pills” for “international shipments around the world” under the name “Buy Viagra Singapore”. Medications listed by Respondent include various references to “Viagra” as well as to medications sold by competitors of Complainant. ...Medications listed by Respondent include various references to “Viagra” as well as to medications sold by competitors of Complainant. Respondent is thus trading on the goodwill of Complainant’s trademarks to attract Internet users, presumably for Respondent’s own commercial gain. ...

2020-12-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0325 for www-viagra.com html (16 KB)

Registration No. 2,162,548 (first use and first use in commerce 4/06/98; issued 6/2/1998) and various worldwide registrations for the mark VIAGRA used in connection with a compound for treating erectile dysfunction. The Complainant provided a copy of the U.S. registration information for the mark VIAGRA ("Mark") as Annex 3 to the Complaint. ...Element (i) - Domain Name Identical or Confusingly Similar to the Mark The Complainant provided sufficient documentation showing that it is the owner of and has rights in the mark VIAGRA. A review of the second-level domain of the domain name shows that the domain comprises the prefix "www", that generally signifies the "World Wide Web" with respect to the Internet, hyphenated from the Complainant’s mark VIAGRA. ...

2002-07-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1405 for twbuyviagra.com html (8 KB)

根据投诉人提交的证据,争议域名网站使用了投诉人的商标,包括投诉人的商标VIAGRA和PFIZER。争议域名网站亦使用了页眉 “威而鋼丨藍色小藥丸台灣猛男壯陽官網” 和页脚 “All Rights Reservied.© 2010-2018 台灣威而鋼線上專賣 版權所有”,当中 “威而鋼”是 “VIAGRA” 的中文音译。投诉人有理由相信被投诉人在争议域名网站上主要向中国台湾省市场宣传VIAGRA假冒产品。使用争议域名出售仿冒品不属于权利或合法利益。 综上,本案中无证据表明被投诉人已取得与争议域名有关的任何商标权,或争议域名已被用于善意提供商品或服务。无证据表明被投诉人因争议域名而广为人知。...

2018-08-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0794 for cialis-viagra.info, cialisapcalis.com html (26 KB)

Respondent’s addition of the words “apcalis” or “viagra” to the disputed domain names does not eliminate the confusing similarity, because the additional words do not distinguish the owner of the disputed domain names from the owner of the mark. ...However, the domain names and contain not only the Complainant’s mark CIALIS but also the marks APCALIS and VIAGRA which are held by third parties. At least, the mark VIAGRA can be considered as a well-known mark. ...

2004-12-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1030 for cialisoverthecounter.com html (11 KB)

In addition, Internet users (when trying to order the alleged Cialis product) are directed to an online pharmacy where apparently illegal and counterfeit Cialis drugs as well as competitors’ products such as Viagra are sold, possibly also counterfeit. The Complainant’s trademark registrations date back to as early as 1999 thus long predate the registration of the disputed domain name. 5. ...D2013-0056 (domain name ) where it was affirmed that: “The disputed domain name incorporates the mark VIAGRA and is preceded by the words ‘over the counter’. Patients seeking VIAGRA are likely to assume that the disputed domain name is used for a website to advertise pharmacies where VIAGRA is available ‘over the counter’, that is to say without a doctor’s prescription or even for a website that sells VIAGRA online”. ...

2014-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1057 for discountcialis-online.com, viagra-cialis-levitraonlinepharmacy.com, viagracialislevitraonlinepharmacy.com html (12 KB)

The Domain Names and Registrar The disputed domain names <viagra-cialis-levitraonlinepharmacy.com> are registered with eNom.   3. ...Two domain names also contain other widely known drug names, “viagra” and “levitra,” and descriptive terms “online” and “pharmacy”. The other domain name includes “discount” and “online.” ...

2007-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0658 for viagrabuy.org html (32 KB)

In short, it contends that the Domain Name is being used to “unfairly trade on the goodwill and reputation of [the Complainant’s] VIAGRA mark.” In particular, it maintains that the Domain Name is being used to divert Internet users to a website that among other things sells counterfeit VIAGRA tablets. 5.2 The rest of the Complaint merely expands upon those contentions. Details are given of the Complainant’s many VIAGRA trade marks around the world, including the two trade marks identified in the Factual Background section of this decision. ...

2012-07-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1155 for generic-viagra-cialis-cheap-best-price.info html (64 KB)

The image on that document shows a web page that contains the following heading: “Best buy cialis as well as viagra cialis cheap in the market… Buy Online Generic Viagra Cialis Cheap, Didrex / No Prescription Needed!!!”...The “XLPharmacy.com” webpage that is first displayed focuses on a comparison between VIAGRA and its active ingredient, sildenafil citrate (which is misleadingly labeled as “generic Viagra”), both of which are offered for sale. ...

2007-02-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0482 for great-cialis-viagra.biz html (18 KB)

According to the Complainant, the Respondent’s addition of descriptive word “great” and the addition of the trademark “VIAGRA”, to the domain name “does not negate the distinctiveness of Complainant’s CIALIS mark”. See Lilly ICOS LLC v. ...D2000-0664 (finding to be confusingly similar to the PRICE CLUB mark). As regards the addition of the word “Viagra” to the disputed domain name, it has been decided in Lilly ICOS LLC v. Tudor Burden, Burden Marketing, WIPO Case No. ...

2005-08-29 - Case Details