Respondent compares “Generic Viagra” to Pfizer’s Viagra medication emphasizing that the only difference “lies in the packaging and, most importantly, the price”, saving up to 50%.
...D2003-0133; Pfizer Inc. v. myviagra, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0463; Pfizer Inc. v. Order Viagra Online, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0366).
The Domain Name entirely incorporates Complainant’s trademark “VIAGRA” with the addition of the number “1”.
...
2004-09-29 - Case Details
Complainant’s products include sildenafil citrate, an oral medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, marketed under the Mark VIAGRA.
Complainant has provided evidence of trademark registrations for the Mark VIAGRA in the United States (Registration No. 2,162,584 issued June 2, 1998). ...D2003-0133; Pfizer Inc. v. myviagra / Wilbert Smith,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0463; Pfizer
Inc. v Order Viagra Online, WIPO Case
No. D2002-0366).
The Domain Name entirely incorporates the Mark VIAGRA with the addition of the descriptive terms “generic” and “pills.”
...
2004-10-20 - Case Details
Complainant’s products include sildenafil citrate, an oral medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, marketed under the Mark VIAGRA.
Complainant has provided evidence of trademark registrations for the Mark VIAGRA in the United States (Registration No. 2,162,584 issued June 2, 1998). ...D2003-0133; Pfizer Inc. v. myviagra, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0463; Pfizer Inc. v Order Viagra Online, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0366).
The Domain Name entirely incorporates the Mark VIAGRA with the addition of the descriptive terms “generic” and “e.”
...
2004-10-13 - Case Details
Complainant’s products include sildenafil citrate, an oral medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, marketed under the Mark VIAGRA.
Complainant has provided evidence of trademark registrations for the Mark VIAGRA in the United States (Registration No. 2,162,584 issued June 2, 1998). ...D2003-0133; Pfizer Inc. v. myviagra, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0463; Pfizer Inc. v Order Viagra Online, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0366).
The Domain Name entirely incorporates the Mark VIAGRA with the addition of the descriptive terms “first” and “generic.”
...
2004-10-13 - Case Details
The banner at the top of this page states “Generic Viagra full
strength. partial price.” (original emphasis). There is a comparison
of the price of “generic Viagra $2.30/100mg” and “Viagra Brand
$12.25/100mg”. The home page goes on to assert, amongst other things,
“Generic Viagra is the chemical equivalent of Pfizer-brand Viagra.”
and “If you’ve had success in the past with Viagra, Generic Viagra
will work just as well for you. ...
2005-04-08 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant owns the world well known VIAGRA brand for its product sildenafil citrate indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. The VIAGRA mark was registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1998. VIAGRA is marketed in over 150 countries. VIAGRA branded products have been promoted extensively in the United States and around the world and have been featured extensively on television, magazine, and Internet stories and articles. ...
2011-06-24 - Case Details
It offered free worldwide shipping and stated “BioViagra.com is the largest referrer of WHOLESALE Viagra in the world. We have relationships with some of the worlds largest suppliers and can bring you genuine Sildenafil Citrate (the actual drug name of Viagra) from as little $1 per dosage”. ...The FAQ reproduced in Annex 7 to the Complaint under the heading “Are you selling real Viagra/Sildenafil Citrate?” stated:
“The overseas supplier of the drug will always deliver the branded form of Viagra whenever possible. ...
2005-05-10 - Case Details
The Complainant has used VIAGRA in connection with the sildenafil citrate product since April 6, 1998, and obtained its first United States registration for the VIAGRA mark on June 2, 1998 (Complainant’s Annex 3). ...More precisely, it alleges that:
(i) the domain name wholly incorporates the VIAGRA trademark, is identical to the VIAGRA mark but for the additional common and descriptive word “blue”, and is so clearly similar to Complainant’s VIAGRA mark and tradename that it is likely to cause confusion among Complainant’s customers and the consuming public. ...
2004-11-19 - Case Details
The Complainant is the owner of United States Trademark Registration No. 2,162,548 for the trademark VIAGRA. The VIAGRA trademark registration was issued on June 2, 1998, on the Principal Register maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is clear that the Complainant has rights to the word "viagra". The subject domain name incorporates fully the word "viagra" and differs from the Complainant’s mark only by the addition of the word "bomb". ...
2002-05-03 - Case Details
The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has not licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to
register a domain name incorporating the VIAGRA trademark. The Respondent is also unable to receive any
license or permission from Pfizer, as Pfizer does not have any rights to the VIAGRA trademark any longer.
...Given the distinctiveness and renown of the Complainant’s VIAGRA trademark, it is reasonable to infer that
the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant’s VIAGRA
trademark, and to target the VIAGRA trademark. ...
2024-01-17 - Case Details
Complainant attached to the Complaint a copy of its United States trademark registration for VIAGRA with a date of first use of April 6, 1998, and also alleges that Complainant and its affiliates own trademark registrations for the VIAGRA mark in more than 150 countries and that the VIAGRA mark is a coined, famous mark.
...Complainant’s trademark registration attached to the Complaint demonstrates that Complainant has rights in the VIAGRA mark.
The disputed domain name consists of the VIAGRA mark plus the “.online” generic Top-Level Domain. ...
2016-12-05 - Case Details
Complainant contends that it and its affiliates own trademark registrations for the VIAGRA mark around the world, and Complainant provided a seven-page list of trademark registrations for VIAGRA that it states are “valid, unrevoked and uncancelled.”
...The combined expression, EuropeanViagra,
will almost certainly be taken as suggesting a website or other URL which is
a European source for Viagra.”
Therefore, Complainant has proven that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s VIAGRA mark, and Complainant has proven the first of the three elements required by the Policy.
...
2006-02-10 - Case Details
The website to which the Domain Name, , resolved
includes a banner for “Generic Viagra” and also offers persons joining
the club “Free Viagra”. It offers worldwide, discreet shipping.
...The Complainant
contends, however, that there is no such thing as “generic” Viagra:
VIAGRA is a brand name, it is (as already recounted) a registered trademark
in many parts of the world. ...
2005-04-08 - Case Details
Pfizer has
expended millions of dollars and extensive resources on research, development
and marketing of VIAGRA brand sildenafil citrate, the first approved oral therapy
for male impotence. The availability of Pfizer's VIAGRA brand sildenafil citrate
represents a major medical breakthrough and the VIAGRA product has been the
subject of extensive public scrutiny.
...Trademark Registration No.
2,162,548 for the mark VIAGRA. See Complaint, Annex 3. The VIAGRA mark is also
registered by Pfizer, or by a wholly owned subsidiary, around the world. ...
2001-05-15 - Case Details
Die Beschwerdeführerin besitzt darüber hinaus Markeneintragungen für VIAGRA in der ganzen Welt. Eine Liste der weltweiten Eintragungen der Marke VIAGRA wurde als Anlage 4 der Beschwerde beigefügt.
VIAGRA geniesst eine starke Medienpräsenz und ist Gegenstand öffentlicher Untersuchungen und Kommentare. ...
2004-10-20 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant develops and markets sildenafil citrate, an oral medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, as VIAGRA. The Complainant has used VIAGRA in connection with this product since April 6, 1998, and obtained its first United States registration for the VIAGRA mark on June 2, 1998. ...The domain name resolves to a website
bearing the title “Generic Viagra”, where generic sildenafil citrate
(“GSC-100”) is offered for sale at substantially lower prices than
“Viagra ®” is claimed to be available for. ...
2004-10-22 - Case Details
D2003-0133; Pfizer Inc. v. myviagra WIPO
Case No. D2002-0463; Pfizer Inc. v. Order Viagra online, WIPO
Case No. D2002-0366).
The Domain Name entirely incorporates Complainant’s trademark VIAGRA with the addition of the descriptive and generic terms “shop” and the “generic”.
...It is therefore inconceivable that Respondent registered the Domain Name unaware of Complainant’s rights in its VIAGRA mark and with an intent to use it in good faith. Respondent appears rather to have intentionally registered the Domain Name entirely incorporating Complainant’s mark, both to take advantage of the goodwill associated with the VIAGRA trademark and to prevent Complainant as holder of the trademark VIAGRA from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name.
...
2004-09-29 - Case Details
The Domain Name contains the whole of the Complainant’s registered trademark, VIAGRA. It differs from the registered trademark only in:
(a) the addition of 2 hyphens to separate the word “about” from VIAGRA and “Kamagra” from VIAGRA;
(b) the addition of the words “about” and “Kamagra”; and
(c) the addition of the .com gTLD.
Viewed as a whole, the Domain Name contains two distinctive elements: the trademark VIAGRA and the word “Kamagra”. The Domain Name suggests a website related to matters about VIAGRA and Kamagra or, alternatively, Kamagra of the Viagra type. ...
2005-04-08 - Case Details
Complainant markets this medication using the brand name VIAGRA. Complainant has held a USPTO registration for the mark VIAGRA since June 2, 1998, just months following the drug’s regulatory approval. ...Some of
these linked-to sites purport to sell genuine VIAGRA, and some purport to sell
LEVITRA and CIALIS, pharmaceuticals that directly compete with Pfizer’s
VIAGRA. ...
2005-05-12 - Case Details
Complainant
Pfizer asserts as follows:
• The registered VIAGRA mark has worldwide recognition.
• The disputed Domain Name is nearly identical to the trademark VIAGRA
and confusingly similar to Pfizer’s website <"www.viagra.com"...• The Complainant has made substantial commercial use of the VIAGRA mark prior to the Respondent’s registration of the Domain Name.
• The Respondent is not a licensee and therefore has no legitimate interest in the Domain Name or in the VIAGRA mark...
2003-08-14 - Case Details