About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 897   document(s)s (0.032 sec)

Rows

<<  <  421 - 440  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0131 for mycompiere.com, mycompiere.net html (46 KB)

D2002-0101 (finding confusingly similar to HERBALIFE); see also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Sin, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007 (finding confusingly similar to SONY). ...D2002-0101 (finding is confusingly similar to HERBALIFE); also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Sin, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007 (finding is confusingly similar to SONY). ...

2007-04-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0892 for subshop2000.com, subwaypos.com html (21 KB)

D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name in dispute contains the identical mark of the Complainant combined with a generic word or term); See also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word...nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2006-10-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0810 for ambien-rxlist.com html (20 KB)

Diabetes Home Care, Inc. and DHC Services, WIPO Case No. D2001-0174; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Kil Inja, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409; Nokia Corporation v. ...

2006-09-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DMX2006-0004 for samsungmobile.com.mx html (20 KB)

Diabetes Home Care, Inc. and DHC Services, Caso OMPI No. D2001-0174; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Kil Inja, Caso OMPI No. D2000-1409 y America Online, Inc. v. ...

2006-07-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0323 for tmobilepictureworld.com html (22 KB)

PEPSI, SRL (a/k/a P.E.P.S.i) and EMS COMPUTER INDUSTRY (a/k/a EMS), WIPO Case No. D2003-0696; and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409. The Complainant points out that confusing similarity applies to this case in particular, as the trademark T-MOBILE is well-known around the world. ...

2006-05-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0045 for imerys-solidarity.org html (23 KB)

Diabetes Home Care and DHC Services D2001-0174 and others SONY Sony KK .v. Kil Inja D2000-1409 and others AOL America Online Inc .v. ...

2007-04-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0189 for tarbell-oc.com, tarbell-realtor.com, tarbelldesert.com, tarbellestates.com, tarbellpreferred.com, temeculatarbell.com html (22 KB)

D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name in dispute contains the identical mark of the Complainant combined with a generic word or term); See also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word...nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY”). ...

2007-05-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DMX2009-0012 for westerndigital.com.mx html (19 KB)

D2000-0493, Rollerblade, Inc. v. Chris McCrady, Caso OMPI No. D2000-0429 y Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, Caso OMPI No. D2000-1409). La marca WESTERN DIGITAL está totalmente comprendida dentro del nombre de dominio . ...

2009-10-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0013 for aztecadigital.com html (17 KB)

Este Experto considera que el uso del nombre de dominio por parte de la Demandada ha creado la falsa impresión de asociación con la Demandante. (Ver mutatis mutandi, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, Caso OMPI D2000-1409). Y por lo tanto, el nombre de dominio en cuestión fue registrado y es usado de mala fe. ...

2011-03-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-2151 for barclaycardwembley.com html (18 KB)

D2000-0641, the selection of domain names are so obviously connected to the complainant's trademark that their very use by someone with no connection with the company suggests opportunistic bad faith. Similarly, in Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 where the respondent registered a number of domain names incorporating a well-known trademark in its entirety, the panel stated “that it is inconceivable that the respondent could make any active use of the disputed domain names without creating a false impression of association with the complainant”. ...

2011-03-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0953 for dhl.info html (21 KB)

Javier Garcia Quintas and Christiandior.net, WIPO Case No. D2000-0226 and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409, “It is inconceivable that the Respondent could make any active use of the disputed domain name without creating a false impression of association with the Complainant. ...

2008-08-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0644 for accorez.com html (20 KB)

“The addition of ‘my' is not sufficient to avoid confusion.” Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Sin, Eonmok, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007). Finally, it is well established that the mere adjunction of the ccTLD as well as gTLD, such as “.com” or “.net”, are not a distinguishing feature and do not suppress the likelihood of confusion (Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...

2008-08-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2484 for monarchairlineuk.com html (17 KB)

D2011-1426 and the decision cited by the Complainant Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409. The top level domain “.com” is required only for technical reasons and should be disregarded. ...

2013-02-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1308 for sodexogs.com html (19 KB)

D2000-0102; eAuto L.L.C. v. Net Me Up, WIPO Case No. D2000-0104; and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409. The incorporation of the well-known mark SODEXO in the disputed domain name will lead the public to believe that the disputed domain name belongs to the SODEXO group. ...

2013-09-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0243 for legostarwarsadventcalendar.org html (17 KB)

Javier Garcia Quintas and Christiandior.net, WIPO Case No. D2000-0226, and Sony Kabushiki Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409.” Taking in to account the above, added to the absence of participation in the proceeding of the Respondent and the lack of clear contact details, it is in the Panel’s view that the Respondent’s registration was made with knowledge of the Complainant’s mark, which further supports a finding of bad faith registration. ...

2012-04-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1988 for barclaysinternationalbank.com html (18 KB)

A descriptive element cannot remove the overall impression made on the public by a trademark which is the dominant part of the domain name (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). Furthermore, in the present case, the Complainant’s trademark BARCLAYS is well-known in the context of international banking. ...

2011-01-25 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DES2014-0038 for campusisde.es html (19 KB)

Diabetes Home Care, Inc. and DHC Services, WIPO Case No. D2001-0174; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Kil Inja, Caso WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 and America Online, Inc. v. ...

2015-03-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1470 for cam4-rec.com html (18 KB)

Nokiagirls.com a.k.a. IBCC, WIPO Case No. D2000-0102; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha aka Sony Corporation v. A. Smith, WIPO Case No. D2006-0652; LEGO Juris A/S v. Masayuki Sato, WIPO Case No. ...

2012-09-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DES2012-0035 for laveraonline.es html (17 KB)

Diabetes Home Care, Inc. and DHC Services, WIPO Case No. D2001-0174; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Kil Inja, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 and America Online, Inc. v. ...

2012-12-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0744 for support-leagueoflegends.com html (17 KB)

A descriptive element cannot remove the overall impression made on the public by a trademark which is the dominant part of the domain name (Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409). In the present case, the Panel considers that the dominant part of the disputed domain name is the Complainant’s trademark LEAGUE OF LEGENDS and that the disputed domain name’s similarity to the Complainant’s trademark is further exacerbated by the fact that it is almost identical to the uniform resource locator of the Complainant’s support website, being merely one character different. ...

2012-06-12 - Case Details