About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 62852   document(s)s (0.1 sec)

Rows

<<  <  53341 - 53360  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-2191 for cecredsale.com pdf (102 KB)

The Respondent is lar frank, no, Philippines. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2026-07-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-3781 for adikteev-apps.com pdf (184 KB)

The Respondent is 浦 玲琴, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2023-11-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-4293 for adittion.com pdf (135 KB)

The Respondent is Mallard OUNCH, Canada. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognisable within the Domain Name as an obvious misspelling (namely an extra "t"). Accordingly, the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...

2023-12-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0646 for tiktokblaster.com html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Private Registrant, Digital Privacy Corporation, United States of America (“United States”) / Dani Kaptzunim, Israel. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with 101domain GRS Limited (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The test for confusing similarity involves the comparison between the trademark and the Domain Name. The Domain Name incorporates the Complainant’s trademark, with the addition of “blaster”. The addition does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the Domain Name and the Complainant’s trademark. ...

2021-04-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1640 for joseffrank.com html (10 KB)

The Respondent is 12Timer ApS, Greger Bjorkegren, of Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eNom (the “Registrar”). 3. ...However, as the proprietor of the disputed domain name, the Respondent has had all means to redirect the disputed domain name to another website. This is confirmed by the fact that the disputed domain name does currently not resolve to any website. ...

2013-11-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1548 for xlovecam-en-ligne.com html (10 KB)

The Respondent is Whoisguard Protected, Whoisguard, Inc. of Panama City, Panama / Viacheslav Kononov of Moscow, Russian Federation. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2016-09-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1312 for twomenandatruckfranchise.com html (9 KB)

The Respondent is Jason Rager / Paydues Inc. of Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc. 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2011-09-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-0549 for academyofmusic.com html (10 KB)

Respondent is PCI Consulting Group, of Wilmington, North Carolina, United States of America. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc. 3. ...Such use of the disputed domain name does not constitute use in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. There also is no evidence that Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name or that Respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name. ...

2011-06-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2020-3520 for tiktoktruck.com html (33 KB)

Respondent, furthermore, contends that Complainant’s contention that Respondent’s use of the word “truck” in the disputed domain name means that it has intentionally created a domain name confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark and domain name is galling. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the TIK TOK trademark in its entirety. Numerous UDRP panels have recognized that incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is at least confusingly similar to a registered trademark (see e.g., PepsiCo, Inc. v. ...

2021-04-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DME2020-0005 for rolandgarros.me html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC, United States of America / Danil Dzigur, Russian Federation. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark. The domain name is identical to the ROLAND GARROS registered trademark and the addition of the ccTLD “.me” does not add any distinctiveness to the disputed domain name. ...

2020-09-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1932 for tbwa.agency html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Karim Bendali, Algeria. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to its well-known trademark TBWA followed by the Top-Level Domain (”TLD”) suffix “agency”, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name, and the Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...

2019-10-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2462 for homejonathanadler.com pdf (162 KB)

The Respondent is Wensde Fudef, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2023-08-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-1563 for cosmoprof-bologna.com, motorshowbologna.com html (13 KB)

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendments to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules"). ...In particular, there are UDRP decisions stating that the incorporation of the trademark and a generic word in a domain name is misleading and confusingly similar to the trademark owned by the complainant (LEGO Juris A/S v. ...

2016-10-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0629 for parmaham.com html (28 KB)

  WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma v. Domain Name Clearing Company, LLC Case No. D2000-0629   1. The Parties Complainant is Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma, Via Marco dell’Arpa 8b, 43100 Parma, Italy. ...Consequently, Complainant considers that Respondent is using the Domain Name in bad faith. In support of this argument, Complainant cites the case Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...

2000-09-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-2311 for globant.vip pdf (188 KB)

The Respondent is 312312 3123, A Sa Da Sheng De, Hong Kong, China. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2025-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DEU2017-0011 for sovaldi.eu html (11 KB)

The Respondent is Carina Pavlova of Oerel, Germany. 2. The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar The disputed domain name is . The Registry of the disputed domain name is the European Registry for Internet Domains ("EURid" or the "Registry"). ...In the circumstances, the Panel concludes that the disputed domain name has been registered by the Respondent without rights or legitimate interest in the name. C. ...

2018-02-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-2371 for credit-mutuele.com html (13 KB)

The Respondent is Sanchez Collette of Villanueva de la Serena, France. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with 1&1 Internet SE (the “Registrar”). 3. ...The threshold test for confusing similarity involves the comparison between the trademark and the domain name itself to determine whether the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark. ...

2019-01-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2026-3746 for donzapas.com pdf (155 KB)

The Respondent is Boy Fabio Trixie Tarigan, Indonesia. 2. The Domain Name and Registrar The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Panel finds that the second element of the Policy has been established. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index page 4 C. ...

2026-09-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0253 for quixtarmortgage.com html (6 KB)

Quixtar") a complaint for decision in accordance with the Uniform Policy for Domain Name Dispute Resolution, adopted by the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) on August 26, 1999 ("Policy"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999, and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. ...These activities predate Respondent's registration of the domain name in dispute. Further, Respondent has not established any rights or legitimate interest in respect of the domain name under any of the circumstances set forth in Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy. ...

2000-06-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2025-5452 for cerave-official.com, ceravepakistan.com, ceravepakistan.online pdf (191 KB)

The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrars”). 3. ...page 2 Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). ...

2026-04-13 - Case Details