The Respondent is Ja sook Yang, United States.
2. The domain name and registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-10-22 - Case Details
Lastly, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered for domain flapping or use
in a phishing campaign against the Complainant’s trademark due to the confusing similarity with the disputed
domain name.
...Also, the lack of evidence as to whether the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name
or the absence of any trademarks registered by the Respondent corresponding to the disputed domain name
corroborates the absence of any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
...
2022-03-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Administrator, Fundacion Privacy Services LTD, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Media Elite Holdings Limited
(the “Registrar”).
3. ...D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name is resolved to an English language parking page with sponsored pay-per-click
links (the “Website”).
5. ...
2022-11-22 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name was registered on May 21, 2021. Presently, when attempting to access the webpage that resolves from the disputed domain name, fraud alerts appear at different browsers.
5. ...
2021-12-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is Karznik,
David, Pretrova, Wroclaw 5548, Poland.
2.Domain Name and Registrar
The Domain Name that is
the subject of this Complaint is ("the Domain
Name").
...Respondent registered the
disputed Domain Name and developed a Web site associated with this Domain Name
to advertise and make offers to sell Complainant’s products. ...
2002-07-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Takeshi Komaba , of 3-27-20 Minowachou, Yokohamashi, Kanagawa 2230051, Japan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name in issue is ("the Domain Name").
The Registrar of the Domain Name is Tucows Inc. of 96 Mowat Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M6K 3M1, Canada ("Tucows").
3. ...Finally, paragraph 4(c), provides as follows:-
"Not a Bona Fide Business or Commercial Use. Registering a domain name solely for the purposes identified below shall not constitute a "bona fide business or commercial use" of that domain name:
(i)Selling, trading or leasing the domain name for compensation, or
(ii)The unsolicited offering to sell, trade or lease the domain name for compensation.
...
2002-11-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Salvia Corporation, Riga, Latvia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DSTR Acquisition
VII, LLC d/b/a Dotregistrar.com.
3. ...The addition of “es” in the domain name is not sufficient to avoid misleading the Internet users about the real identity of the holder of the domain name. ...
2006-07-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Anonymize, Inc., United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Epik, Inc. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. The Respondent is not and has never been commonly known by the Domain Name. The fact that the Respondent offers the Domain Name for sale on Uniregistery market website proofs that the Respondent is not interested in the Domain Name and that the Respondent has only registered the Domain Name for commercial gain. ...
2021-06-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Clay Akey, CambriaBike.com, Inc., United States..
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...There is no evidence that Respondent is commonly known by the Domain Name. There is also no evidence that Respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name. ...
2021-08-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is CCDP Consulting of Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-09-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Giuseppe (Joseph) Sansone d/b/a lowesdisposal of Maple, Ontario, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s LOWE’S registered trade mark and that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name and that the Respondent registered the Domain Name and is using the Domain Name in bad faith
B. ...
2011-11-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Daniel Lifveredson, Excore Consulting KB of Göteborg, Sweden.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Ascio Technologies Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-04-13 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
Each of the disputed domain names contains trade marks belonging to the Complainant in their entirety with the addition of material that is incapable of distinguishing each disputed domain name from the mark. ...
2012-03-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is MELODIE CABRAL, France.
2. The Domain Names and Registrars
The disputed domain name is registered with Register SPA.
...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2023-01-04 - Case Details
Respondent is David Ausseil, 4 rue de Greffuhle, 75008 Paris, France, represented by Dominique de Leusse, 52 boulevard Malesherbes, 75008 Paris, France, hereinafter the "Respondent".
2. Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is "tchin-tchin.com", hereinafter referred to as the "Domain Name". ...The Center verified that the complaint satisfies the formal requirements of the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Rules), and the Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Supplemental Rules). ...
2000-07-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jungsuk Lee of Seoul, Republic of Korea.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Bizcn.com, Inc. ...Moreover, there is no evidence to suggest that Respondent is known by the Domain Name or any name corresponding to the Domain Name. Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name
D. ...
2008-09-05 - Case Details
The Respondent is Abid Karmali of Karachi, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-06-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Shruti Yadav of Delhi, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-02-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jianwei Chen of Shenzhen, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-05-27 - Case Details
Respondent is Abigail Becerra, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“hereinafter “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered
with IONOS SE (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2026-08-14 - Case Details