Respondent is Harryson Trey, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Respondent is trading on the fame of Complainant’s Mark and exploiting his website with the good name of Complainant.
Further, Complainant claims that Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name, nor is he making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name, and has registered the Domain Name in bad faith.
...
2021-07-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Melbourne Red Bulls Football Club Pty Ltd of South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC.
3. ...C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on April 10, 2017.
D. The Website at the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website.
5. ...
2018-03-09 - Case Details
The Respondent is Brown Harry of Stadtbergen, Germany.
2. Domain Name
The dispute concerns the following domain name .
3. Procedural History
The Request was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the "Center") on July 20, 2016. ...The disputed domain name incorporates the entirety of the Claimants' trademarked name; the Top-Level Domain suffix and the addition of "outlet" to the disputed domain name do not diminish the identity and confusing similarity with the Claimants' trademarked name.
...
2016-10-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ramin Farzaminia of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran ("Iran").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with IRNIC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "irDRP"), the Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for .ir Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-12-16 - Case Details
eNom informed the Center that the domain name has been placed on hold, but the domain name had expired and was listed in the redemption period with the global registry. ...The difference in writing therefore stems from the rules and technical
necessities of the domain name registration system (see Fiat Auto S.p.A v.
Italienska bil, WIPO Case No. BIZ2001-00030,
with respect to the domain name ).
...
2004-11-04 - Case Details
The Panel also notes that
currently all the disputed domain names are being passively held.
The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
...The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.
Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
...
2024-07-30 - Case Details
The Respondent is Mary Smith, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the “Domain Name”), is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The invitation to the Complainant to file an amended Complaint stemmed from the fact that the Domain Name
was registered in the name of a privacy service. In response to the Center’s registrar verification request, the
Registrar disclosed the name and address of the entity in whose name the Domain Name is currently registered.
...
2022-07-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is polo polo, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-11-22 - Case Details
Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected / Charles Dublin, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to or confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2021-03-19 - Case Details
Surridge of Margaret River, Australia, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2016-09-12 - Case Details
The Respondent in this proceeding is Paul Anthony Darke whose contact details are Compton, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, United Kingdom
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
This dispute concerns the domain name "leonard-cheshire.com".
The registrar with which the domain name is registered is Core Internet Council of Registrars, whose website is located at "www.corenic.net".
...In the Panel's view the domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
7. Decision
The domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2001-04-26 - Case Details
Therefore, the mere registration of a domain name comprised of such a term establishes Respondent’s right and legitimate interest in the domain name.
...Here, the domain name does not incorporate either mark in its entirety. Further, the domain name cannot be said to be a variation of either of the marks. ...
2006-02-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is Olga Shiropaeva, Moscow, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint naming Respondent as the registrant of the disputed domain name satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2008-09-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Contact Privacy Inc., Customer 1245952419, Canada / tlahdenranta, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed Domain Name was registered on November 25, 2019. There is currently no website accessible at the disputed Domain Name.
5. ...
2020-09-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lakisha Moore, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Alibaba.com Singapore E-Commerce Private Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The disputed domain name was registered on September 17, 2021. The disputed domain name resolves to a website in Chinese (the “Respondent’s website”). ...
2022-02-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Martin Schola / Petra Novak / CN Exchange of Sunnyvale, California, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Melbourne IT Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...ii) Rights or legitimate interests
Complainant states that it has found no evidence to suggest that Respondent has been commonly known by the Domain Name or attempted to secure any trademark or other rights related to the Domain Name. The Domain Name was registered on November 10, 2015. ...
2016-02-05 - Case Details
Respondent is Peter Kaeppeli, Manila 1700, the Philippines, hereinafter the "Respondent".
2. Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name in dispute is .
The registrar for the disputed domain name is Network Solutions, Inc., 505 Huntmar Park Drive, Hernon, Virginia 20170, United States of America.
3. ...The domain name was and is registered and used in bad faith.
Respondent has registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name to Complainant who is the owner of the trademark, or to a competitor of Complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of his documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name.
...
2002-12-13 - Case Details
The Respondents are Sam Sharma and Liquid App, LLC, United States, represented by
Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A., United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is identical to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-03-03 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainants have a multitude of trademark rights around the world in the term FINAL FANTASY since 1993 (registration date) onwards and also offer their products and services especially on their website under the domain name . The disputed domain names were registered on March 21, 2019, by the Respondent.
...
2020-12-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Organellum Bt./Mitnyik Laszlo of Hungary.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with CSL Computer
Service Langenbach GmbH dba Joker.com.
3. ...The Complainant further alleges that the Respondent never used the domain name at issue, nor made any demonstrable preparations to use the disputed domain name or any name corresponding to it either non-commercially or in a fair manner and that the Respondent has never been known by the domain name subject to this proceeding.
...
2007-04-20 - Case Details