Respondent is Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona, United States / Alex Boyle of Portland, Oregon, United States, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (expressed in Latin script as ) (the “Domain Name”) is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2019-01-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Vaggelis Latsis, Greece.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Realtime Register B.V.
...Discussion and Findings
For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the
Complainant has rights;
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2026-08-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Dantangchun, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Bangning Digital
Technology Co.,Ltd (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In the circumstances, the Panel finds that the Respondent does not have
any rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name.
In addition, the nature of the Domain Name together with the website at the Domain Name creates a strong
risk of Internet user confusion.
...
2026-07-15 - Case Details
The Respondent is ahmet topal, Türkiye.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2026-04-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is Amna Shahid, Pakistan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc.
...The entirety of the mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed domain
name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2024-03-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whoisguard Protected, Whoisguard, Inc. of Panama City, Panama / Giovanni Bonny of Limburg, Belgium, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In this Panel’s view this establishes bad faith registration of the disputed domain name as there was neither authorization nor consent from the Complainant to register the disputed domain name.
...
2017-03-23 - Case Details
Respondent is WhoisGuard protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. of Panama / Jkemp H, Jordan Kemple of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with eNom, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2016-07-20 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Policy” or ”UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ”Supplemental Rules”).
...Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name.
Respondent does not have any registered trademarks or trade names corresponding to the Disputed Domain Name, nor does Respondent have any legal rights to the LEGO name. ...
2012-10-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is CC, Bayland, St Michael, Barbados.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with DomainsAtCost
Corporation.
3. ...Given the appearance, sound, connotation and commercial similarity of the domain name and the marks, the Panel finds the Respondent’s domain name and Complainant’s name and trademark LECLERC are confusingly similar.
...
2006-02-01 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wil Smit of Berlin, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the "Domain Name") is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...On August 10, 2016 when the Panel searched the Domain Name with its browser, the Domain Name redirected to a website under the domain name where pharmaceutical products were offered for sale under the Trade Marks, adding in Dutch that a prescription was not needed. ...
2016-08-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domain Admin / WhoIs Privacy Corp., Bahamas.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with TLD Registrar Solutions Ltd. ...C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on November 16, 2018.
D. Use of the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name has previously been used in respect of a Russian language website offering for sale the Complainants’ products under the Trade Mark as well as the Complainants’ unrelated dental care products under the trade mark ORAL-B (the “Website”). ...
2020-02-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Pan Pin, Hong Kong Shunda International Co. Limited of Hong Kong, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the “Domain Name”), is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Currently the Domain Name is not connected to an active website.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its MIRACURL registered trade mark; that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and, finally, that the Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2014-10-22 - Case Details
According to Network Solutions’ who-is database, the Respondent in this administrative proceeding is Datasphere, with an address of 4067 Beltway, Unite 126, Addison, Texas 75001, U.S.A.
2. The Domain Name(s) and Registrar(s)
This dispute concerns the domain name (the "Domain Name"). ...The Panel therefore concludes that the Domain Name violates Paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that Respondent’s ownership of the Domain Name violates Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy.
7. ...
2001-04-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Fur Online Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York, USA, having its principal place of business at 2 Main Street, Roslyn, New York 11576, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and the Registrar
The domain name at issue is "revillon.com" (hereinafter the "Domain Name"). ...On June 25, 2000, the Registrar confirmed that the Domain Name had been registered via the Registrar’s registration services, that the Respondent was the current registrant of the Domain Name and that the Domain Name was active. ...
2000-09-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Jason Sanjoto of Hamburg, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-02-22 - Case Details
Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. of Panama City, Panama / Neckar Rhein of Berlin, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2018-01-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Malik Aboshkiwa, LC Waikiki IN USA & CANADA, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Panel finds the mark is recognizable within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark LC WAÏKIKI for the purposes of the Policy.
...
2023-12-28 - Case Details
Respondent is peter any, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...In addition, Complainant owns the
domain name, , among others.
The disputed domain name was registered on November 27, 2023. ...
2024-03-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wang Ya Bei of Xingtai, Hebei, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. ...Respondent
The Respondent is an individual resident in China.
C. The Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name was registered on July 31, 2014.
D. The Website at the Disputed Domain Name
The disputed domain name is resolved to a domain name parking website containing a "this domain name is for sale" banner link, with sponsored links to websites apparently providing goods and services of the Complainant, and also sponsored links to third party websites (the "Website").
5. ...
2015-05-29 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent has never been commonly known by the disputed domain name.
(3) The disputed domain name was registered and used in bad faith by creating a likelihood of confusion with the trademark JAVA. ...
2010-01-15 - Case Details