These include the details "tuluntuo" and "fskldfj," which
were provided in relation to the billing contact for the domain name. This constitutes
evidence of registration and use of the domain name in bad faith: Trip.com
Inc. v. ...The Panel takes all these matters into account and, in the
absence of any response from the Respondent or any evidence to the contrary,
finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of
the domain name.
Paragraph 4a(iii):
Domain Name Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The Complainant has sought
to demonstrate bad faith on the part of the Respondent in the registration of
the domain name as well in the use of the domain name: see Telstra Corporation
Limited v. ...
2003-04-16 - Case Details
None of these integers alone would preclude the disputed Domain Name from being
confusingly similar. For a hyphen, see e.g. Viacom International Inc v. Erik
Peterson, WIPO Case No. ...In these circumstances and in the absence of any rebuttal
from the Respondent, the Panel concludes that the disputed Domain Name has been
registered and used in bad faith: see e.g. the Ansell Healthcare Products
Inc. v. ...
2005-04-08 - Case Details
See Gannett Co., Inc. v. Henry Chan,
WIPO Case No. D2004-0117 (a domain name incorporating a well-known trademark combined with a geographically descriptive term is confusingly similar to the trademark); Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. ...See Expedia, Inc. v. European Travel Network,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0137 (finding bad faith where the respondent registered the domain name after the complainant established rights in the complainant’s trademarks). ...
2019-10-25 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with NameSilo, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...It is well-established that the gTLD used as technical part of a domain name may be disregarded (see Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Andrew Miller,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1345). ...
2018-01-17 - Case Details
It does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the Domain Name and the Complainant's trademark. See Ansell Healthcare Products Inc. v. Australian Therapeutics Supplies Pty, Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...D2006-0464); and see, e.g., Bartercard Ltd & Bartercard International Pty Ltd. v. Ashton-Hall Computer Services,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0177.
Even where the Domain Name resolves to an "error" page, the Panel does not believe that it changes the finding. ...
2016-04-22 - Case Details
Respondent is Private Registration of Sydney South, New South Wales, Australia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Crazy Domains FZ-LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Wachovia Corporation v. Peter Carrington,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0775.
Accordingly, the Panel finds that Complainant has rights in the PETPLAN mark and that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark. ...
2017-07-17 - Case Details
Paragraph 10(e) of the UDRP Rules grants a panel the power to consolidate multiple domain name disputes.
At the same time, paragraph 3(c) of the UDRP Rules provides that a complaint may relate to more than one
domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain-name holder. ...“This test typically involves a
side-by-side comparison of the domain name and the textual components of the relevant trademark to
assess whether the mark is recognizable within the domain name … [I]n cases where a domain name
incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is
recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar...”). ...
2022-12-06 - Case Details
It claims that although the products promoted from the website operating from the Domain Name are new and used Lego products, the use of the Domain Name in this case does not satisfy the conditions set down in Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...v) Domains Secured LLC would appear not to be the true “underlying” registrant of the Domain Name. In particular:
(a) BrainHost.com has sent emails to the Center in which it has suggested that some other person or entity is the “owner” of the Domain Name but does not disclose the name or identity of that person or entity;
(b) Domains Secured LLC would appear to be the name of a further domain name privacy service; and
(c) there have been previous domain name proceedings involving the Registrar, BrainHost.com and Domains Secured LLC in which “Domains Secured LLC” was the registrant and the domain name was held, inter alia, to have been registered and used in bad faith (see InfoSpace, Inc. v. ...
2012-01-10 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Melbourne IT Ltd.
3. ...It refers in this respect to RuggedCom, Inc. v. LANstore, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2005-0760 (November 15, 2005) in relation to the domain name and Nominet Appeal Panel decision RuggedCom, Inc. v. ...
2009-04-30 - Case Details
The Respondent has no right or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name currently resolving to an
inactive website (see, e.g., Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Daniele Tornatore, WIPO Case No. ...D2022-0688).
The fact that the website at the disputed domain name provided adult sexually explicit content is a clear
indication that the domain name has been registered and used in bad faith (see, e.g., Six Continents Hotels,
Inc. v. ...
2023-01-16 - Case Details
See also Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane S.p.A. v. Colour Digital,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1260 (finding bad faith where Respondent made no use of the domain name in question).
...MIC c/o Syed Hussain, NAF Claim No. 1322235 (holding respondent's offer to sell the domain name constitutes bad faith); Little Six, Inc. d/b/a Mystic Casino Hotel v. Domain For Sale a/k/a Anatoly Polishchuk, NAF Claim No. 96967 (finding respondent's offer to sell the domain name at issue to complainant was evidence of bad faith). ...
2017-07-27 - Case Details
See Reuters Limited v. Global Net 2000, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0441 (the letters “www” have no distinguishing capacity in the context of domain names for they represent, when succeeded by a period, an extremely common, although not universal, prefix to the domain name in a URL for a web page on the Internet); and MasterCard International Incorporated v. ...It is beyond cavil that this type of use of the domain name constitutes bad faith in the context of the Policy. See F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG v. Transure Enterprise Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-08-19 - Case Details
Such would appear to be the case here, where the disputed domain name is offered for a minimum price of USD 500. See Harpo, Inc. and Oprah’s Farm, LLC v. Robert McDaniel,
WIPO Case No. ...Previous UDRP panels have found bad faith where the use is simply offering for sale a confusingly similar domain name incorporating a third party’s trademark or for an excessive consideration. See Groupe Auchan v. ...
2018-10-08 - Case Details
These trademarks predate the registration date of the disputed domain name which is May 4, 2016.
Many UDRP panels have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark where the disputed domain name incorporates the complainant’s trademark in its entirety (e.g., Multi Media, LLC v. ...D2015-1320; KOC Holding A.S. v. VistaPrint Technologies Ltd,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1910). This is the case in the present proceeding, where the second level domain of the disputed domain name consists exclusively of the Complainant’s registered trademark.
...
2016-09-12 - Case Details
Previous UDRP decisions have demonstrated that geographical additions do not alter the underlying meaning of a domain name, so as to avoid confusing similarity. This has been held in many UDRP cases (see e.g. Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. ...It is unquestionable that Internet users frequently associate a domain name comprised of a trademark with the particular company that produces or offers goods and/or services under that mark (see DaimlerChrysler Corporation v. ...
2010-06-21 - Case Details
Forum LLC,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0309, regarding domain name which uses the mark with a misspelling of the term “insurance”, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v Henry Adams,
WIPO Case No. D2006-1492 for the domain name and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Rebecca Foster,
WIPO Case No. ...
2007-12-10 - Case Details
Rights or Legitimate Interests
Without more, the registration of a domain name does not necessarily give rise to rights or legitimate interests in a domain name. See, e.g., Gold Medal Travel Group Plc v. ...See Recordati S.P.A. v. Domain Name Clearing Company,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0194 (passive holding of domain name without use in commerce can support finding of bad faith use); Telstra Corporation Limited v. ...
2015-07-14 - Case Details
Magic Domain,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0202, and in ProCPR, LLC v. Name Administration Inc. (BVI),
WIPO Case No. D2007-0823).
...Roust Trading Limited v AMG LLC,
WIPO Case No. D2007-1857.
The Respondent has provided no evidence that it has any rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Name. ...
2008-11-20 - Case Details
In this case, the disputed domain name consists of a misspelling of the Trademark.
In the present case of the disputed domain name there is a replacement of the letter “v”
instead of the “c”, in the middle of the disputed domain name. ...This was the opinion of the panel in
TPI Holdings, Inc. v. LaPorte Holdings, WIPO Case No. D2006-0235, “typosquatting – intentionally adding or
deleting a letter or two, or transposing letters in, a valid mark of another in one’s domain name – is
presumptive evidence of bad faith in registration and use of a disputed domain name”.
...
2022-09-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Stocktrade Limited of Dublin, Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registry
The disputed domain name is registered with IE Domain Registry Limited ("IEDR").
3. ...Prior Policy panels have found that when a domain name and trade mark are identical but for the ".ie" ccTLD, the "identical or misleadingly similar" element of the Policy is satisfied: Groupon Europe GmbH v. ...
2015-04-01 - Case Details