The Respondent is Numan Oztas, Belgium.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with One.com A/S (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has never been authorized to use the Domain Name. The Respondent has used the Domain Name to redirect to a website offering jewelry, but not goods made by the Complainant. ...
2019-10-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Thomas Jacobo, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with 1&1 IONOS Inc. ...Moreover, the Respondent has no prior rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. The Respondent is not commonly known in the market by the Domain Name. Finally, the Domain Name does not resolve to any active website.
...
2019-09-12 - Case Details
The Respondent is Host Master, 1337 Services LLC, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...Based on the Respondent’s use of the Domain Name, the Panel concludes that the Respondent knew of the Complainant when the Respondent registered the Domain Name. ...
2021-04-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Thomas M Colman of Sheffield, Pennsylvania, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Register.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name in spite of the mention on the website to which the domain name resolves: “we are an official Dior online store”. ...
2013-03-05 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Complainant, as previous owner of the disputed domain name has attempted to re-purchase the disputed domain name from the Respondent in the past, but the price the Respondent was seeking was too high. ...
2013-10-28 - Case Details
The Respondent is G & R International of Ridgefield, New Jersey, United States of America (“US”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-02-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is RED MAIL, of Phoenix, United States America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...On the available evidence, it is not commonly known by the Domain Name per se, nor it is making legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the Domain Name.
There does not appear to be any other basis on which the Respondent could claim rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name. ...
2009-01-22 - Case Details
The Respondent is WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc., Panama / Morrison Knudsen, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Plainly this constitutes use of the disputed domain name in bad faith and the Panel therefore concludes that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
7. ...
2021-02-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Auto Direct LLC of Eagan, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-05-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...The disputed domain name is directed to a GoDaddy.com parking page.
Complainant contends that the disputed domain names were registered in bad faith, most likely for the purposes of selling them for valuable consideration.
...
2017-02-20 - Case Details
Respondent is Meijuan Zhang, China (“hereinafter referred to as “Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complaint, Annex 6.
Respondent registered the disputed domain name on March 14, 2021. Complaint, Annex 1.
The disputed domain name resolves to a website offering financial services. ...
2021-06-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Wolfgang Robert, the Netherlands.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Domain Name appears to be a misspelling of the Complainant’s trademark, and the Domain Name resolves to an inactive website.
...
2021-09-13 - Case Details
The disputed domain name was registered on August 10, 2022. At the time the complaint was filed and
currently the disputed domain name is not linked to an active website.
5. ...Complainant
Complainant contends that (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant’s
trademarks, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name; and (iii)
Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2023-01-17 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that
the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.
...
2023-11-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Privacy Corp. of Nassau, New Providence, the Bahamas.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name, (the "Domain Name"), is registered with Internet Domain Service BS Corp (the "Registrar").
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to its OPORTUN registered trade mark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name and that the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2017-06-19 - Case Details
The Respondent is Marcus Mekterovic, United Kingdom.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (“the Domain Name”) is registered with
Launchpad.com Inc. ...Previous Panels have held that where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the
domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark.
The addition of a hyphen to a complainant’s mark in a domain name has been commonly held in cases
under the UDRP not to prevent confusing similarity between that domain name and the complainant’s mark.
...
2023-01-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Louis Finon, Niger.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant claims that:
(a) The disputed domain name wholly incorporates and is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark;
(b) the Respondent lacks any rights or legitimate rights in the disputed domain name; and
(c) the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith, including by reproducing the Complainant’s subsidiary’s name and physical address under the “CONTACT” section of the website at the disputed domain name.
...
2020-12-29 - Case Details
https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index
https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index
page 4
6. .../Edoardo Fano/
Edoardo Fano
Sole Panelist
Date: September 11, 2026
https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/domain-name-disputes/overview/index
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
GeoGuessr AB v. brave kieu, fred sandersus, fred, and brave andy
Case No. ...
2026-09-16 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Launchpad.com Inc. ...Moreover, the element “financeltd” in the disputed domain name confuses the public into believing that the disputed domain name is intended to resolve to a website of the Complainant’s subsidiary Relx Finance Limited.
...
2021-08-16 - Case Details
Confirm that the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP") was in effect.
Indicate the current status of the domain names.
...Having sold their stock in Fulleon in 1992, neither Bill, Bobby, nor any other member of the Amlani family has any right to use "Fulleon" as a trademark, trade name, or domain name or to authorize others, such as Bhavesh Kotecha, to register or use a domain name consisting of the FULLEON mark.
...
2001-08-29 - Case Details