The Respondent is Shota Nakano of Japan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...On December 4, 2009, an employee of the Complainant registered the disputed domain name. On November 18, 2011, the disputed domain name was assigned to the Complainant. The Complainant has been using the disputed domain name from 2009 until 2012.
...
2013-08-15 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant asserts:
- that it is proprietor of registered trade marks for "The Law Society" to which the domain name at issue is confusingly similar;
- that the Respondent has offered to sell the domain name to the Complainant;
- that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
- that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Discussion and Findings
(1) The Respondent admits that he acquired the domain name at issue for the purpose of offering it to others by way of sale, rather than for his own use as a domain name. ...
2000-06-21 - Case Details
The Respondent is Richard Orzel, dssmlth of Richmond, Michigan, United States of America ("US").
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wild West Domains, LLC (the "Registrar").
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2018-06-07 - Case Details
Respondent is Alej Gonz / Alejandro Gonzalez, Offshore Racks, Panama.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Nicenic International Group Co., Limited (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy lists the three elements which Complainant must satisfy with respect to the Domain Name:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and
(ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2020-12-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is Forsyte Corporation of Bahamas.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Abdomainations.ca Inc.
3. ...Furthermore, the Domain Name is very similar to the corporate name, Groupe ROC ECLERC and the domain name, , “groupe” being a non-distinctive word for a legal entity.
...
2008-12-22 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The Respondent has not made a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name as the disputed domain name redirects to an inactive page.
The Complainant contends that the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. ...
2018-08-17 - Case Details
Customer 0154649100, Canada / Ramon Rego Ferreira, Rosramshop, Spain.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Tucows Inc. ...The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not authorized to use the Complainant’s trademark. The Respondent is not commonly known by the Domain Name. The Respondent cannot establish rights in the Domain Name as it has not made any use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2020-10-07 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
QVC, Inc., ER Marks, Inc. v. Domain Buyer
Case No. D2006-1020
1. The Parties
The Complainants are QVC, Inc., of Pennsylvania, United States of America, and ER Marks, Inc. of Delaware, United States of America, both represented by Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz, LLP, United States of America. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2006-10-24 - Case Details
The disputed
domain name was registered on February 28, 2022, and the disputed domain
name was registered on May 12, 2022. ...The
Complainant notes that access to the disputed domain name has been blocked
by the leading web engines but that the fraudulent website linked to this disputed domain name is still active.
...
2023-09-28 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...The disputed domain name was registered on June 3, 2022, and the disputed domain names
and were registered on May 26, 2022. ...
2023-01-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whoisproxy.com, United States / Amir Cohen, Hush Privacy Protection Ltd., Seychelles.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Key-Systems GmbH (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Discussion and Findings
For this Complaint to succeed in relation to the Domain Name, the Complainant must prove that:
(i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and
(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
(iii) the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2019-11-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Flor Walden, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...No. 17900772, registered on January 18, 2019. The Respondent registered the disputed domain name on April 2, 2019. It has used the disputed domain name to redirect web users to the Complainant’s official website. ...
2020-01-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hka c/o Dynadot Privacy of the United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent registered the domain name on 16 April 2014 (the “Domain Name”).
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trademarks as the dominant part of the Domain Name is “Sanofi”, while the extension “.buzz” is generic. ...
2014-07-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is Badan Sergiu, Badan Sergiu, Republic of Moldova.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Name.com, Inc. (the “Registrar”).
3. ...As of May 18, 2026, the disputed domain name resolved to a Sedo page offering the disputed domain name
for sale with a minimum offer price of USD 9,999.
...
2026-07-16 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Finally, the Complainants submit that the Disputed Domain Names are used in bad
faith since they are resolving to the same “Plesk” holding page. This use cannot be considered as an active
use of a domain name, and the non-use should be considered as passive holding which is considered as a
bad faith use of a domain name.
...
2024-01-04 - Case Details
The Respondent is lu xixi, PRIVATE of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Vautron Rechenzentrum AG. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2015-09-11 - Case Details
Respondent is Prateek Sinha, Ascension Healthcare Inc. of Edison, New Jersey, United States.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Domain.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2019-02-01 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with FastDomain, Inc. ...In that email the Respondent gave an explanation of why the Domain Name had been registered and stating that he was prepared to transfer the Domain Name to the Complainant.
3.6 On November 13, 2013, the Panel issued a procedural order bringing the Respondent’s email to the attention of the Complainant and asking the Complainant to confirm whether it agreed to the transfer of the Domain Name or wished the Panel to proceed to a substantive decision. ...
2013-11-27 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names (the “first disputed domain name”) and (the “second disputed domain name”) are registered with PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com (the “first Registrar”). ...However, the Registrar of the third disputed domain name has confirmed that the language of the registration agreement for that disputed domain name is Chinese.
...
2018-06-21 - Case Details
The Registrants are Adrian Demian and Peter Heuston of Dublin, Ireland, represented internally.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with IE Domain Registry Limited (the “Registry”).
3. ...The use of this disputed domain name is key to the Government-approved project set out above.
The disputed domain name may have been registered with a view to selling, renting, licensing or otherwise transferring the registration to the Complainant for valuable consideration in excess of the Registrant’s documented expenses which are directly related to the registration of the disputed domain name. ...
2012-11-23 - Case Details