It now has 14 casinos which were visited by over 1.17 million people in 2012.
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) was first registered on December 14, 2004. The Respondent became the holder of the Domain Name on February 9, 2012.
5. ...The Domain Name is being used for a commercial website offering casino services. The Respondent does not make a legitimate noncommercial use of the Domain Name, and the Domain Name is not being used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2013-12-06 - Case Details
The Respondent is Matt Braska, Chatham, Massachusetts of United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <18000flowers.com> (the “Domain Name”)
is registered with eNom.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2005-04-07 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name upon which this complaint is based is "betwilliamhill.com". ...To the extent that there are differences between the domain name and the mark, such as the spaces between words in the mark and the fact that "williamhill" is preceded by "bet" in the domain name, the Panel finds confusing similarity proven. ...
2000-11-01 - Case Details
The webpage at the disputed domain name is inactive.
5. Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical to Complainant's trademarks, that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
...Complainant has found no evidence that Respondent has been commonly known by the domain name or is making legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name. Indeed, as discussed below, Respondent appears to be using the disputed domain name for fraudulent purposes.
...
2018-07-11 - Case Details
The Respondent is Johnson Clarke, Absa International of Umuebulu, Nigeria.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Domain Name”) is registered with OwnRegistrar, Inc. ...There is no evidence of the Respondent’s use of the Domain Name or a name corresponding to the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2019-01-22 - Case Details
Customer 1247189803, Canada / NorAm Accounts Receivable, United States of America (the “United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name [xn--sodxo-6ra.com] (the “Domain Name”) is registered with Google LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent cannot establish rights in the Domain Name as it has not made use of, or demonstrable preparations to use, the Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering. ...
2020-08-27 - Case Details
The Complainant also owns the domain name .
The disputed domain name was registered on August 1, 2020. The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website and has been set up with MX records.
5. ...The disputed domain name does not direct to an active website. The disputed domain name, though, has apparently been used for messages, as it has been set up with a MX record.
...
2020-09-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is Withheld for Privacy Purposes, Iceland / Amtim salim, Morocco.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on December 22, 2021, including the disputed domain name and the domain name . On December 23, 2021, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name and the other domain name. ...
2022-03-01 - Case Details
The registration of the Complainant’s trademark preceded the registration of the Domain Name for years. The Domain Name is similar to the well-known trademark. The Respondent’s registration and use of the Domain Name is typosquatting, and this does not constitute a legitimate use. ...The Respondent is not making any legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name. The Respondent’s registration and use of the Domain Name looks indeed like a classic case of typosquatting. ...
2019-05-24 - Case Details
El Camino Real, PMB 131, Sunnyvale, California 94087, the United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name in dispute is .
The registrar for the disputed domain name is Network Solutions, Inc. ...Moreover, from what the Panel can glean from the record, the Respondent's sole interest in the disputed domain name and the numerous other domain names it has registered is to attempt to re-sell them. The Panel finds Respondent has no legitimate rights or interests in the disputed domain name.
...
2001-02-14 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It also holds international and European trade mark registrations for the trade mark ROLAND GARROS FRENCH OPEN. The Complainant also owns several domain name registrations incorporating the words “french open” and “roland garros”, the earliest of which date from 1996. ...
2017-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Kelvin Pol of Moscow, Russian Federation.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GKG.NET, INC (formerly GK Group LLC) (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark XENICAL, the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name and the Respondent registered and uses the disputed domain name in bad faith.
...
2014-12-10 - Case Details
The Respondent is Lawrence Thompson of Kamen, Germany.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name () is registered with Cronon AG (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The website is inactive since the registration of the disputed domain name. The Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name can be considered as passive holding.
B. ...
2015-11-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is Privacy Service Provided by Witheld for Privacy ehf, Iceland / Dale Worsfold, United
States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed Domain Name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2022-07-07 - Case Details
Respondent is Mei Ying Lin, Philippines (hereinafter “Respondent”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2021-07-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Perfect Privacy, LLC / Thomas Hill, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Register.com, Inc (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name.
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. ...
2021-03-29 - Case Details
The Respondent is he le of Tianjin, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Shanghai Meicheng Technology Information Development Co., Ltd. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2013-06-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Total Security Vision of Orlando, Florida, United States of America.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-11-22 - Case Details
A domain name is “identical or confusingly similar” to a trademark for purposes of the Policy when the domain name includes a trademark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of other terms in the domain name.
...Respondents' names bear no connection to the disputed domain name. Respondents are not affiliated with Complainant, and do not have the permission, consent or license of Complainant to register the disputed domain name.
...
2010-06-02 - Case Details
Respondent is Christian Mendes of Miami, Florida, United States of America, self-represented.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name at issue is . The domain name at issue is registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...Respondent is a resident of the United States. Respondent registered the domain name at issue on August 10, 2011. Complaint, Annex 1. The domain name at issue does not resolve to a web site.
5. ...
2013-12-05 - Case Details