The Panel therefore determines that English shall be the language of the proceeding.
Substantive Issues:
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of the registered trade mark NETBET. The trade mark has been incorporated in its entirety in the disputed domain name.
...
2016-12-27 - Case Details
In summary the Respondent says that the evidence demonstrates that he did not register the disputed domain name in bad faith as is required under the Policy.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns a combined word/device Benelux trade mark registration under number 891361, filed on October 27, 2010 incorporating the BOUNZ word mark and a Community word mark registration number 10895191 for BOUNZ, which was filed on May 18, 2012. ...
2015-10-06 - Case Details
In summary, the Respondent says that it believes that the disputed domain name is an apt name for parties wanting to use it in relation to “adventure” and that in the circumstances of the generic nature of the disputed domain name there is no evidence of targeting by the Respondent and it is not bad faith for the Respondent to attempt to sell the disputed domain name to third parties.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns a Spanish trade mark registration for ADVENTUM under number M-3011914 which was filed on December 30, 2011 and registered on April 16, 2012. ...
2017-09-05 - Case Details
As a consequence the Respondent’s email of October 2, 2017 will not be accepted into the record and it follows that the Panel will also not accept the Complainant’s supplemental filing into the record.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has demonstrated that it owns numerous trade mark registrations for its WHATSAPP mark, including, in particular, Australian trade mark 1442974 registered on May 24, 2011. ...
2017-11-01 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2026-05-29 - Case Details
Respondent
Although procedurally summoned, the Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2026-02-25 - Case Details
In any event, even if the Panel had
admitted the Parties’ supplemental filings, it would not have affected the outcome of this proceeding.
6.2 Substantive Elements of the Policy
The Complainant must prove each of the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to prevail.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the Trade Mark.
Disregarding the country code Top-Level Domain, the disputed domain name is identical to the Trade Mark.
...
2026-01-05 - Case Details
Having considered all the matters above, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the
language of the proceedings shall be English.
6.2 Substantive Considerations
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has established rights in the SNCTM trademark through its registered
United States trademark, predating the registration of the disputed domain name, and also keeping in mind
its long-standing use since 2013 in connection with the private-members club, variety of events, and
associated products.
...
2025-11-26 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark
CARREFOUR and CARREFOUR SPECTACLES registered in the European Union; the Respondent has no
rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the disputed domain name was
registered as well as used in bad faith.
5. ...
2026-07-07 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. ...
2026-04-27 - Case Details
The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark
CARREFOUR and CARREFOUR SPECTACLES registered in the European Union; the Respondent has no
rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and the disputed domain name was
registered as well as used in bad faith.
5. ...
2026-07-03 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and
Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights
are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law.
...
2022-09-28 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Commission Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph
B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights
are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law.
...
2022-10-05 - Case Details
Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the European Union Regulation (EU) No. 874/2004 and Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-
(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights
are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law.
...
2022-07-05 - Case Details
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel agrees with the Complainant that the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant’s
earlier trademark SONEPAR. ...
2023-03-28 - Case Details
The Panel notes that this decision is rendered without prejudice to any action that an applicable Court may deem appropriate or necessary in furtherance of a proceeding in that forum.
B. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has submitted sufficient evidence to demonstrate its registered rights in the ALIEXPRESS trademark.
...
2022-02-22 - Case Details
The Panel has authority to decide the dispute examining the three elements in paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, taking into consideration all of the relevant evidence, annexed material and allegations, and performing some limited independent research under the general powers of the Panel articulated, inter alia, in paragraph 10 of the Rules.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant indisputably has rights in the registered trademark ALSTOM, both by virtue of its numerous trademark registrations and as a result of its global goodwill and reputation. ...
2021-04-21 - Case Details
Pursuant to Paragraph B(11)(d)(1)(i)-(iii) of the ADR Rules, the Panel finds that:
The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right or rights
are recognized or established by national law of a Member State and / or European Union law.
...
2023-02-17 - Case Details
Discussion and Findings
In accordance with paragraph 4(a) of the Policy, in order to succeed in this proceeding, the Complainant must prove (i) that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which it has rights; (ii) that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and (iii) that the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2010-05-10 - Case Details
To invoke the Policy, a Complainant must show that the domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights, that the Respondent lacks rights or a legitimate interest in the domain name, and that the Respondent registered and used the name in bad faith. ...
2014-04-09 - Case Details