About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 296   document(s)s (0.027 sec)

Rows

<<  <  261 - 280  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1072 for ihghotels.com html (23 KB)

D2000-0493 (“non-response is indicative of a lack of interests inconsistent with an attitude of ownership and a belief in the lawfulness of one’s own rights”) and GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090. The Panel therefore finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. ...

2017-08-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1630 for laguiadelmichelin.com html (24 KB)

Kim Hyungho, WIPO Case No. D2003-0679 and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. Milan Swiss Branch Mendrisio v. Lin Jinqing, WIPO Case No. D2012-1412 have held that where a complainant is unable to communicate in the language of the registration agreement, having all documents translated into said language may well represent a significant financial burden for the complainant. ...

2018-09-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1599 for solitaire-euromaster.info html (24 KB)

This point is reinforced by the circumstances where Complainant’s sent Respondent a cease-and-desist letter and Respondent had an opportunity to respond and explain its registration of the Domain Name, but did not do so. See GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090, quoting Pomellato S.p.A. v. Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. ...

2018-10-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-1185 for leclercgroupe.com html (21 KB)

D2000-0493 (“non-response is indicative of a lack of interests inconsistent with an attitude of ownership and a belief in the lawfulness of one’s own rights”) and GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090. The Panel therefore finds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain Name. ...

2018-08-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2446 for piratesofthecaribbeanlego.com html (21 KB)

Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. D2000-0493, and Giorgio Armani v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090). Therefore, based on the evidence, the Panel is satisfied that the second element under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is met. ...

2013-02-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1671 for electroluxinsentives.com html (22 KB)

Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. D2000-0493, and Giorgio Armani v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090). Therefore, based on the evidence, the Panel is satisfied that the second element under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is met. ...

2011-12-19 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1343 for zippwheels.com html (22 KB)

LeaseDomains.com, WIPO Case No. D2013-0711 and Giorgio Armani S.pA. Swiss Branch, Mendrisio v. Gabriella Chung, WIPO Case No. D2013-0821). In light of the above, the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Trade Mark. ...

2014-10-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2014-0020 for solvay.co html (21 KB)

The Panel also notes that the Respondent exhibits a clear pattern of registering and using domain names to prevent legitimate trademark and/or service mark owners from reflecting their marks in corresponding domain names and has been joined as the Respondent to numerous prior UDRP decisions that involved transfer orders: (see: Lange Uhren GmbH v. Ye Li, WIPO Case No. D2013-1947; Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Ye Li, WIPO Case No. DNL2013-0030; Guccio Gucci S.p.A. v. Zhao Ke / Yeli / Corporate Domains, Inc / Li Ye, WIPO Case No. ...

2014-10-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0355 for volvorss.info html (20 KB)

Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. D2000-0493, and GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090) it may be the case that “non-response is indicative of a lack of interests inconsistent with an attitude of ownership and a belief in the lawfulness of one’s own rights”. ...

2013-04-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1179 for mercure-chester-west.com html (21 KB)

Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. D2000-0493 and GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090). Therefore, based on the evidence, the Panel is satisfied that the second element of the Policy is met. ...

2012-07-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-1412 for delmasline.com, wwwdelmas.com html (21 KB)

Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. D2000-0493 and GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090). Therefore, based on the evidence, the Panel is satisfied that the second element of the Policy is met. ...

2013-11-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0186 for pickford-removals.com, pickfordremovals.com html (23 KB)

StepWeb, WIPO Case No. D2000-1500; GA Modefine SA v. Armani International Investment, WIPO Case No. D2000-0305). This is in particular the case when, as in this matter, the generic word that is added to the trademark is descriptive of the activity and business of the Complainant. ...

2003-05-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-0759 for corneliani.net html (21 KB)

If the Respondent had challenged the complete lack of support of the claim that CORNELIANI is a well known trademark in Italy, the Panel could have found [cf. Armani Exchange Case (GA Modefine S.A. v. Sparco P/L, Case No. D 2000-0419)], that the Complainant had failed to meet its burden of proof. ...

2000-11-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0103 for porscheexchange.com html (23 KB)

D2001-0331, Paragraph 6 (GA Modefine S.A. v Namezero.Com), it was also ascertained that a domain name which includes a world-wide known trade mark (Armani) and the word "exchange" is confusingly similar to the trademark used by the Complainant. The addition of the gTLD ".com" does not dispel Internet user confusion because domain name registrants must make use of a gTLD, and ".com" does not in this case signal that Respondent is distinct from Complainant (see Dr. ...

2002-03-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0555 for cajamed.com html (24 KB)

Al respecto, véanse las decisiones en los OMPI Casos D2001-0308 ó D2001-0331, relativos a la marca GIORGIO ARMANI. Véase también OMPI Caso D2001-0298. Teniendo todo ello en cuenta debo llegar a la conclusión de que el concepto de "similitud hasta el punto de causar confusión" no puede flexibilizarse, tal y como pide el Demandante, hasta alcanzar expresiones no usadas en el tráfico jurídico por la parte que alega este argumento, y/o que tampoco guardan con aquellas marcas o expresiones usadas un parecido fonético o literal suficiente como para considerar que el público puede llegar a ser confundido en relación con la procedencia u origen del uso del dominio cuestionado. ...

2002-08-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1644 for michelinstarrestaurantslondon.com html (23 KB)

Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. D2000-0493; and GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090). Therefore, based on the evidence, the Panel is satisfied that the second element of the Policy is met. ...

2015-11-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1533 for revloncoupon.com, revloncoupon.net, revloncoupon.org html (24 KB)

Richard Tonetti, WIPO Case No. D2000-0493, and Giorgio Armani v. Yoon-Min Yang, WIPO Case No. D2005-0090). Therefore, based on the evidence, the Panel is satisfied that the second element under paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is met. ...

2011-11-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-0144 for kerastaseonline.com html (23 KB)

The brands which belong to L’Oreal include L’Oreal (usually spelled L’Oréal), Garnier, Kérastase, Roger & Gallet, Cacharel, Giorgio Armani, Lancôme, Ralph Lauren, YSL and The Body Shop. It is well known as utilizing the famous Spanish actress Penelope Cruz on many of its posters seen around the world. ...

2012-03-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2024-4844 for vaxrabeo.com, vaxrabia.com pdf (237 KB)

/ Jim Moretta, WIPO Case No. D2016-0096; Giorgio Armani S.p.A. Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio v. Min Zhi, WIPO Case No. D2013-0020; Christian Louboutin v. no, WIPO Case No. ...

2025-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DUA2021-0001 for rb-ink.com.ua html (25 KB)

It also produces its products under the licensed brands including Giorgio Armani, Burberry, Bulgari, Chanel, Coach, Dolce&Gabbana, Ferrari, Michael Kors, Prada, Ralph Lauren, Tiffany & Co., Valentino and Versace. ...

2021-04-19 - Case Details