The Complainant has registered several trade marks referred to as the Armani Trademarks, being GIORGIO ARMANI, ARMANI, EMPORIO ARMANI, ARMANI EXCHANGE and AX ARMANI EXCHANGE. ...By the same token, it would be reasonable to assume that GIORGIO ARMANI, ARMANI, EMPORIO ARMANI, ARMANI EXCHANGE and AX ARMANI EXCHANGE are somehow connected or associated with the person Giorgio Armani or his licensees or associates.
...
2001-05-10 - Case Details
Complainant owns registrations in multiple jurisdictions for its trademarks ARMANI, GIORGIO ARMANI, EMPORIO ARMANI & Design, ARMANI COLLEZIONI, ARMANI CODE & Design, ARMANI MANIA BLACK CODE (Stylized), A|X ARMANI EXCHANGE (Stylized), and ARMANI JUNIOR.
...Complainant
Complainant claims to own several hundred trademarks worldwide incorporating ARMANI including registrations for ARMANI, GIOGIO ARMANI, ARMANI COLLEZIONI, ARMANI CODE, ARMANI MANIA BLACK CODE, ARMANI EXCHANGE, ARMANI JUNIOR, and EMPROIO ARMANI. ...
2011-07-01 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A. Milan Swiss Branch Mendrisio v.
emporio armani watches
Case No. D2012-0928
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.p.A. ...The Complainant owns trademark registrations for ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI. There is no doubt that the Complainant has rights in these trademarks. The Disputed Domain Name incorporates the trademarks ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI in their entirety.
...
2012-07-26 - Case Details
The Complainant owns several trade mark registrations worldwide for the ARMANI (US ARMANI trade mark No. 2009673, registered on October 22, 1996), ARMANI/CASA (International trade mark No. 1337989, registered on October 20, 2016), ARMANI CASA (US trade mark No. 76076847, registered on September 14, 2004), ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS (International trade mark No. 1075756, registered on March 14, 2011) and ARMANI RESIDENCE MARASSI (International trade mark No. 1084351, registered on April 18, 2011) trade marks (“Armani Trade Marks”).
...It also incorporates the distinctive part of the Complainant’s ARMANI RESIDENCE MARASSI trade mark, and is very similar to the Complainant’s ARMANI/CASA and ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS trade marks. ...
2017-05-24 - Case Details
The disputed domain name comprises the Complainant’s trademarks ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI with the addition of the word “watch.”
The dominant element of the disputed domain name is “Emporio Armani”, which is identical to the Complainant’s trademark EMPORIO ARMANI.
...The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in using the trademarks ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI.
The website at the disputed domain name offers goods for sale, including goods with the Complainant’s trademarks ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI. ...
2016-08-01 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A. Milan Swiss Branch Mendrisio v. Lin jinqing
Case No. D2012-1412
1. The Parties
Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.p.A. ...The ARMANI Marks are well-known all over the world.
The disputed domain name <armani-emporio.com> incorporates entirely Complainant’s ARMANI Marks.
...
2012-11-09 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of various trade mark registrations incorporating ARMANI, GIORGIO ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI (collectively, the “ARMANI Trade Marks”). These include
Jurisdiction Trade mark Trade mark number Registration date
WIPO ARMANI 502876 May 1, 1986
WIPO ARMANI 838290 August 3, 2004
WIPO GIORGIO ARMANI 437479 April 20, 1978
WIPO EMPORIO ARMANI 536698 May 22, 1989
China GIORGIO ARMANI 5954717 August 21, 2010
The ARMANI Trade Marks are used on luxury fashion products and often covered in fashion magazines and newspapers around the world. ...Kim Hongtae,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0851; GA Modefine SA, Giorgio Armani SpA v. Ahmad Haqqi,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0834).
The Complainant is also the registrant of a large number of domain names incorporating for words Armani, Giorgio Armani and Emporio Armani. ...
2012-06-15 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Cinard Floyd
Case No. D2020-1718
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.p.A., Italy, represented by Legalitax Studio Legale e Tributario, Italy.
...The Complainant has provided screenshots of the website resolving from the disputed domain name on June 9, 2020, at which appears the EMPORIO ARMANI device trademark, the words “Giorgio Armani S.p.A is an Italian luxury fashion house founded by Giorgio Armani which designs, manufactures, distributes and retails haute couture, ready-to-wear, leather goods, shoes, watches, jewellery, accessories, eyewear, cosmetics and home interiors”, and 12 different men’s watches offered for sale bearing the EMPORIO ARMANI device trademark.
5. ...
2020-09-16 - Case Details
패널은 “절차규칙” 제7조에 따라 센터가 요청한 대로 패널위원으로서의 수락 성명서 및 공평성과 독립성 선언서를 제출하였다.
4. 사실관계
신청인은 여러 국가에서 ARMANI, GIORGIO ARMANI, ARMANI HOTEL, ARMANI HOTELS, ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS, AHR ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS 등에 대하여 상표권을 보유하고 있다. ...신청인의 주장
신청인의 주장은 다음과 같이 요약할 수 있다.
첫째, 신청인은 여러 국가에서 ARMANI, GIORGIO ARMANI, ARMANI HOTEL, ARMANI HOTELS, ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS, AHR ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS 등에 대하여 상표권을 가지고 있고, 이들 상표가 저명한 상표이고, 분쟁도메인이름이 신청인의 상표인 ARMANI HOTEL과 동일하고 ARMANI HOTELS, ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS, AHR ARMANI HOTELS & RESORTS등의 상표와 혼동을 일으킬 정도로 유사하며, 더 나아가 분쟁도메인이름과 연결된 웹사이트가 신청인의 공식 사이트이며 신청인이 분쟁도메인이름의 등록 및 사용을 허락한 것처럼 보인다고 주장한다.
...
2012-03-02 - Case Details
Factual Background
The following facts are not contested:
(a) The Complainant has rights on the following trademarks:
International:
GIORGIO ARMANI ( May 1, 1986) , 502877 (more than 20 countries) (Holder Codefine SA )
EMPORIO ARMANI (May 22, 1989) , 536698 (12 countries) (Holder Giorgio Armani SPA)
GIORGIO ARMANI (March 17, 1988), 522094 (more than ten countries) (Holder Codefine SA)
ARMANI (May 1, 1986) , 502876 (more than 20 countries) Holder Codefine SA)
GIORGIA ARMANI ( April 20, 1998), Renewal, R437479 ( more than 25 countries)( Holder GA Modefine SA)
USA :
GIORGIO ARMANI ( October 1, 1997) 2,288,471 ( Holder GA Modefine SA)
Canada:
EMPORIO ARMANI & DESIGN ( February 3, 1999) 650497 (Holder GA Modefine SA).
...b) The Respondent has registered on March 01, 1999, the domain name: "ARMANI-SUNGLASSES.COM".
5. Parties’ Contentions
(a) Complainant
The Complainant points out that "he owns several trademarks worldwide known, the Armani Trademarks, as GIORGIO ARMANI, ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI. ...
2000-06-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A. Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio v. Jin Yi
Case No. D2013-0158
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.p.A. ...The Complainant further contends that it is recognized that the Armani trademarks are well-known all over the world.
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name incorporates entirely the Complainant’s house mark ARMANI and the Complainant’s Armani trademarks ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI. ...
2013-04-19 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A., Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio, Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. InternetCont Ltd., Manuela Miracul
Case No. ...D2007-0834; GA MODEFINE SA., Giorigio Armani S.P.A. v. kim Hongtae,
WIPO Case No. D2007-0851; Giorgio Armani S.P.A. Milan Swiss Branch Mendrisio v. emporio Armani watches,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-09-26 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant contends that the ARMANI trade marks are well-known all over the world. Furthermore, the Complainant argues that the Domain Name incorporates entirely Complainant's trade marks ARMANI, GIORGIO ARMANI, A|X ARMANI EXCHANGE and AX ARMANI EXCHANGE. ...GA Modefine S.A., Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Germano Armani,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1793, GA MODEFINE S.A., Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Ahmad Haqqi,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-03-02 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A. Milan, Swiss Branch Mendrisio v. Min Zhi
Case No. D2013-0020
1. The Parties
Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.p.A. ...Complainant is the owner of hundreds of trademarks for or including ARMANI registered and used in numerous countries throughout the world. The registered trademarks include the trademarks GIORGIO ARMANI, ARMANI, ARMANI JEANS and AJ ARMANI JEANS. ...
2013-03-04 - Case Details
The Complainant contends that it has worked in 36 countries and developed a large number of brands, such as "Armani", "Georgio Armani", "Emporio Armani", and "Armani Collezioni" etc. ("Armani Trademarks").
The Complainant alleges that its trademarks are well-known and enjoy a great notoriety, which was confirmed by several previous UDRP panels. The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its Armani Trademarks because it incorporates an important part of the GIORGIO ARMANI and of the EMPORIO ARMANI trademarks. ...
2018-09-12 - Case Details
Factual Background
The following facts are not contested:
(a) The Complainant has rights on the following trademarks:
International:
GIORGIO ARMANI ( May 1, 1986) , 502877 (more than 20 countries) (Holder Codefine SA )
EMPORIO ARMANI (May 22, 1989) , 536698 (12 countries) (Holder Giorgio Armani SPA)
GIORGIO ARMANI (March 17, 1988), 522094 (more than ten countries) (Holder Codefine SA)
ARMANI (May 1, 1986) , 502876 (more than 20 countries) Holder Codefine SA)
GIORGIA ARMANI ( April 20, 1998), Renewal, R437479 ( more than 25 countries)( Holder GA Modefine SA)
USA :
GIORGIO ARMANI ( October 1, 1997) 2,288,471 ( Holder GA Modefine SA)
Canada:
EMPORIO ARMANI & DESIGN ( February 3, 1999) 650497 (Holder GA Modefine SA).
...Parties’ Contentions
(a) Complainant
The Complainant points out that "he owns several trademarks worldwide known, the Armani Trademarks, as GIORGIO ARMANI, ARMANI and EMPORIO ARMANI. Said trade marks are used for different kinds of goods , such as clothes, glasses, perfumes in many classes with registrations in Europe, United States of America and many international registrations at the WIPO. ...
2000-06-30 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A v. ping li, yisun
Case No. D2021-1712
1. The Parties
Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.p.A, Italy, represented by Legalitax Studio Legale e Tributario, Italy.
...Factual Background
The following facts appear from the Complaint and its Annexes, which have not been contested by Respondent.
Complainant GIORGIO ARMANI S.p.A. is the head of a group of businesses (the “Armani Group”) founded in 1975 by fashion icon Giorgio Armani, comprising one of the most famous fashion and lifestyle companies in the world, and providing a broad range of goods and services under trademarks incorporating the name “Armani” (the “ARMANI Mark”). ...
2021-07-27 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE
PANEL DECISION
GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Yoon-Min Yang
Case No. D2005-0090
1. The Parties
The Complainants are GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A; GA Modefine S.A. is located in Mendrisio, Switzerland and Giorgio Armani S.p.A. is located in Milano, Italy.
...Factual Background
The Complainants, GA Modefine S.A. and Giorgio Armani S.p.A., own several trademarks on which their complaint is based:
ARMANI
GIORGIO ARMANI
EMPORIO ARMANI
The registration of said trademarks is not disputed.
5. ...
2005-04-27 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A. v. Daulet Tussunbayev
Case No. D2011-2082
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.P.A. of Mendrisio, Switzerland, represented by Studio Rapisardi S.A., Switzerland.
...It is unanimously recognized that the ARMANI trademarks are well-known all over the world.
The disputed domain name incorporates entirely the Complainant's trademark ARMANI. ...
2012-02-01 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Giorgio Armani S.p.A. Milan Swiss Branch Mendrisio v. Lizhen Ye
Case No. D2013-0808
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Giorgio Armani S.p.A. ...Complainant
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to its trademarks ARMANI, ARMANI JEANS and AJ ARMANI JEANS (“ARMANI marks”), that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to the disputed domain names and that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith.
...
2013-07-05 - Case Details