Las Promoventes forman parte del grupo denominado Apple Leisure Group, uno de los principales grupos de gestión de viajes, hospitalidad y lujo de América del Norte. ...Que el 11 de mayo de 2019, Apple Leisure Group recibió una comunicación proveniente de un segundo cliente con respecto a otro correo electrónico promocional fraudulento, enviado desde la dirección <[...]...
2019-12-06 - Case Details
Additionally, Verizon owns which redirects to and offers Apple Inc.’s IPHONE wireless device for sale. Several UDRP panels in both the European Union and United States have recognized Verizon’s rights in the VERIZON mark and ordered transfers of confusingly similar domain names accordingly. ...Due to the presence of the trademark IPHONE in the Disputed Domain Name, Complainant has obtained a letter of authorization from Apple Inc. (the owner of the IPHONE trademarks) to obtain transfer of the Disputed Domain Name if ordered in this proceeding (produced as Annex 7 to the Complaint).
...
2012-04-13 - Case Details
The Respondent is Rika Doi, Apple of Urawa-ku, Saitama, Japan / Whois Privacy Protection Service by onamae.com of Tokyo, Japan.
2. ...c) The disputed domain name does not correspond to the name of the Respondent and “Apple” is not commonly known as INTESASANPAOLO EURODESK
(d) The Complainant does not find any fair or noncommercial uses of the disputed domain name.
...
2015-01-08 - Case Details
According to the information provided at the bottom of the
home page, the website is operated by Zeno Limited, which is the same entity that published the app
ZenoPay Pro previously available on the Apple and Google app stores. The Complainant has provided
copies of email communications showing that ZenoPay Pro was removed from both Apple and Google stores
in the United States.
...However, despite the Respondent confirming its availability to implement
the measures requested by the Complainant, the Respondent’s application published on the Apple app store
remained available for download in the United States.
The Complainant also submits that it sent trademark infringement notices to Google and Apple, following
which the availability of the Respondent’s application was restricted to users outside the United States, and
contends that the acceptance of the Complainant’s claims by the platforms confirms that the Respondent’s
use was not legitimate.
...
2026-07-27 - Case Details
Mobile apps bearing the CARESYNC mark were launched for Apple iOS and for the Android market in April 2013 and August 2013 respectively. In addition, Complainant maintains multiple social media pages that bear the CARESYNC mark. ...Content displayed on the website located at the disputed domain incorporated Complainant’s CARESYNC mark and its related apple logo, and displayed active links to Complainant’s Apple and Android mobile apps. The content had the appearance of promoting Complainant’s products and gave the appearance of an official connection to Complainant, or that it was the official domain name for Complainant. ...
2016-07-20 - Case Details
Фактические основания
Заявитель широко известен на рынке Российской Федерации под именем “reStore” и “re:Store” как сеть магазинов, в том числе, онлайн, специализирующихся на реализации товаров третьих лиц, в частности, компьютеров, мобильных телефонов и аксессуаров компании Apple. Заявитель является его официальным партнером и последующим продавцом-дистрибьютером (Apple Premium Reseller). ...Один из веб-сайтов “re-Store.top”, который связан в основном с товарами компании Apple в качестве “дисконт центра Apple в Москве”, ссылается на авторские права на содержание – “copyright 2005-2020”.
...
2021-05-11 - Case Details
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used by the Respondent in bad faith since:
- The Complainant's trademark has gained a strong reputation in the world and is considered as a well-known trademark;
- The circumstance that the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant's trademark makes it more unlikely that the Respondent was not aware of the Complainant's rights;
- The Respondent is using the Complainant's trademark for its own commercial gain, as it has pointed the disputed domain name to a website where it offered the disputed domain name for sale to the highest bidder, as shown by the tag line "a good name, a good start" published therein;
- The very use of a domain name incorporating a well-known trademark where the Respondent has no connection with the product suggests opportunistic bad faith;
- The Respondent engaged in a pattern of registering domain names incorporating famous trademarks since it registered two additional domain names incorporating the trademark APPLE.
- The Respondent did not reply to the cease-and-desist letter that the Complainant addressed to the Respondent on November 26, 2016.
...With reference to the domain names including the sign "apple" that the Respondent registered as highlighted by the Complainant, namely <apple-eshop.com> and , the Respondent claims that they are not identical or confusingly similar to the trademark APPLE as "apple" is only used as a fruit name in them and Iran is one of the most important apple fruit producers in the world.
6. ...
2017-05-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is an authorized agent of travel agencies Apple and GoGo Tours. Both Apple and GoGo Tours have contracts with the Complainant's hotels. The Respondent is authorized to resell the Complainant's rooms through the contracts with Apple and GoGo Tours.
6. ...The Respondent alleges that:
- it is an authorized agent of travel agencies Apple and GoGo Tours and that both Apple and GoGo Tours have contracts with the Complainant's hotels; and
- the Respondent is authorized to resell Complainant's rooms through the contracts with Apple and GoGo Tours.
...
2010-06-21 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
The Coryn Group, Inc. , Apple Vacations West, Inc. v. V.S. International
Case No. D2003-0664
1. The Parties
The Complainant is The Coryn Group, Inc., & Apple Vacations West, Inc., of Pennsylvania, United States of America, represented by Holland & Knight LLC, United States of America.
...Factual Background
The Complainant holds trademark registrations for APPLE and APPLEVACATIONS in the United States and in Mexico, with continuous use dating back to 1979. ...
2003-10-16 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Apple Inc. v. Stanley Pace (a.k.a. Jordan Smith, Chris Carter, sunhei.org, Keith Besterson, Shahamat, Staci Michele and Courtney Culbertson) and Fundacion Private Whois
Case No. ...This could well be seen either as the words "a pole" in combination or as the word "apple" with a typographical error (i.e. the second "p" being replaced with letter "o"). The fact that the Domain Name might sensibly (as opposed to fancifully) be read as "apple" with a typographical error, is in the Panel’s view, sufficient to justify a finding of confusing similarity with the Complainant’s APPLE mark when applying the necessary low threshold test. ...
2013-10-17 - Case Details
According to the Complainant’s evidence, the Domain Name redirected to various websites related to third
parties, some of which displayed the messages of Apple Defender Security Center fake alert scams.
5. Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The following information has been taken from the Complaint, Amended Complaint and the attached
Annexes.
...Rather, at the time of filing of the
Complaint, the Domain Name redirected to various websites related to third parties, some of which displayed
the messages of Apple Defender Security Center fake alert scams.
Therefore, the Panel concludes that the Respondent has neither rights nor legitimate interests in the Domain
Name.
...
2022-09-09 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Apple Computer, Inc. v. DomainHouse.com, Inc.
Case No. D2000-0341
1. The Parties
The Complainant is Apple Computer, Inc., a corporation organized in the State of Delaware, United States of America (USA), with place of business in Cupertino, California, USA.
...A search of the Network Solutions’s database shows that the domains apple.net is registered with Columbia River Networks, created on May 31, 1995; and apple.org registered to Apple Network, created on December 31, 1997. The United States Patent and Trademark Office limits the scope of the issued trademark to such specific use by Apple Computer, rejecting broader claims of use as part of the trademark prosecution process, in order to permit other companies to use the same mark in other trademark classifications and even in its own class, if they were clearly differentiated products. ...
2000-07-18 - Case Details
It asserts that the Respondent’s registration of the disputed domain name was opportunistic having been made two days after an Apple announcement of its “Next Generation of Mac” laptops, including the Apple M1 that uses the Complainant’s chip architecture.
...Registered and Used in Bad Faith
The disputed domain name was registered on November 12, 2020 which was two days after an Apple announcement of its “Next Generation of Mac” laptops, including the Apple M1 that uses the Complainant’s chip architecture and many years after the Complainant’s first use of its ARM mark in the United States and after the registration of the Complainant’s United Kingdom trade mark registration No. ...
2022-03-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is Ujjwal, Green Apple Info of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with BigRock Solutions Pvt Ltd. ...The Respondent is known by the name of “Ujjwal” and “Green Apple Info”. The Complainant has not authorized the Respondent to use the name and their trademark QUIKR. ...
2017-02-17 - Case Details
For an example of the application of View 2, see Sermo Inc v. CatalystMd LLC, supra.)
In Apple Inc., the panel noted that “the heart of the divide” in panel views lay with the View 1 understanding that the purpose of the Policy paragraph 4(a)(i) test is “to determine whether or not Internet user confusion is likely”. ...While the issue is not free from difficulty, the Panel considers that the Complainant has failed to meet the standard articulated in the Apple Inc. case, even allowing for the relatively undemanding “standing” threshold established by paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy. ...
2013-09-27 - Case Details
The Complainant contends that the buttons on the Respondent’s website inviting visitors to download the
Complainant’s mobile app from the Apple App Store and the Android Google Play Store are not what they
appear to be. The Complainant contends that clicking those buttons leads to a file with a .mobileconfig file
extension being automatically downloaded to the user’s device. ...The Complainant contends that the buttons on the Respondent’s website inviting visitors to download the
Complainant’s mobile app from the Apple App Store and the Android Google Play Store are not what they
appear to be. The Complainant contends that clicking those buttons leads to a file with a .mobileconfig file
extension being automatically downloaded to the user’s device. ...
2022-11-11 - Case Details
If, for example, a person were to make and sell computers under the brand name APPLE, that would (absent a license) be likely to be deemed to infringe the strong, arbitrary APPLE® trademark owned by Apple Computer, Inc., as there would be a high likelihood that a consumer or end-user would be confused into believing that these computers originated with, or were authorized or associated with, that company. If, however, the person were to use that same term in connection with selling the fruit of an apple tree, there would be no infringement, and no likelihood of confusion, as the use would be of the descriptive or generic term "apple." ...
2002-10-15 - Case Details
Factual Background
Complainant Incase Designs Corp. is a global leader in the design, development, manufacturer, and sale of carrying cases and bags for consumer electronics, such as the Apple iPhone, iPod, iPad, and Apple MacBook laptop. Incase Designs Corp. was founded in 1997 and is the owner of numerous registered word and design marks in the United States and internationally, having first registered the trademark in 1997. Complainant offers a product line called the “Incase Snap Case” which is designed to protect various Apple products such as the iPhone and iPod.
Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Name on July 30, 2011 and created a website to which the Disputed Domain Name resolves. ...
2011-12-20 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainants are part of the Apple Leisure Group (“ALG”), a United States corporation doing business worldwide in the travel and accommodation sector.
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainants, as parts of the Apple Leisure Group, have provided evidence of their trademarks registration upon the AMRESORTS and AMREWARDS trademarks. ...
2019-12-26 - Case Details
Furthermore, the Complainant submitted evidence of the Respondent’s use of
“Nestflow” in the Apple App Store. The Complainant further submitted evidence of the Respondent’s
trademark application before the United States trademark office filed on June 17, 2025. ...As the Complainant also states, it filed a complaint before
Apple App Store about the NESTFLOW app of the Respondent at the same time as the present Complaint,
namely on November 16, 2025. ...
2026-01-30 - Case Details