The website contains a disclaimer, where in small letter type it is mentioned that LEGO® and DUPLO® are registered trademarks owned by KIRKBI A/S (the registered owner of the LEGO trademark in the USA, belonging to the LEGO Group of companies), and that the tables are not manufactured by the LEGO Group.
...Furthermore, despite the disclaimer on the website, explaining that LEGO is a trademark of the LEGO Group and that the so-called LEGO® compatible tables are not manufactured by the LEGO Group, confusion is likely to remain as to possible sponsorship or endorsement of the website by the LEGO Group. ...
2007-09-14 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Le Nam, assafoushop
Case No. D2022-3083
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...Complainant
Complainant’s assertions may be summarized as follows.
Complainant is the owner of the LEGO mark used in connection with the famous LEGO construction toys
and other LEGO branded products. ...
2022-11-04 - Case Details
D2010-1169; LEGO Juris A/S v. XMGlobal Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1168; LEGO Juris A/S v. J.h.Ryu,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1156; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...D2010-0839; LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v..Dealwave,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0881; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-08-09 - Case Details
The dominant part of the disputed domain name comprises the word “lego”, which is identical to the registered trademark LEGO. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s world famous trademark LEGO. ...D2009-0680 (“LEGO is a mark enjoying high reputation as construction toys popular with children.”)
In LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-10-25 - Case Details
Factual Background
Complainant, based in Denmark, owns the LEGO trademark and other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other products. ...Respondent’s websites at the disputed domain names also feature links that directly reference Complainant and its business, namely referring to links such as “LEGO Instructions”, “LEGO Sets”, LEGO Brick” and “FIRST LEGO League”. Presumably, Respondent receives pay-per-click fees from the linked websites listed on the disputed domain names’ websites. ...
2020-02-12 - Case Details
Factual Background
A. The Complainant
The Complainant, LEGO Juris A/S, based in Denmark, submits that it is the owner of the LEGO brand relating to the famous LEGO children’s construction toys and related products. ...The word “lego” also forms the dominant part of many domain names held by the Complainant.
The fame of the LEGO Trade Marks has been confirmed in numerous cases considered by UDRP panels, for example in cases: LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2010-10-13 - Case Details
In LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp., supra and LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo, supra, the panels found that the LEGO mark is distinctive, famous and well-known. ...Prior decisions have held that the LEGO mark is well-known, including LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr, supra (“The LEGO mark is well-known worldwide”), LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-02-14 - Case Details
For instance, the following WIPO UDRP panels have held that the LEGO trademark is well-known, famous and distinctive: LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...Also, the use of a hyphen in the disputed domain names <lego-harrypotter.site>, <lego-harrypotter.website> and <lego-hogwarts.online> is irrelevant in a finding of confusing similarity (see, e.g., Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. blue crystal,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-09-06 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. facai gao
Case No. D2020-3497
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...In addition, the Complainant owns close to 5,000 domain names containing the LEGO mark.
The disputed domain name was registered on October 29, 2020, and resolves to a website that offers LEGO toys for sale and features the Complainant’s LEGO word and device mark and represents itself as being an “Official LEGO® Shop US”.
5. ...
2021-03-31 - Case Details
Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840 LEGO, “LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260, “In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate the [c]omplainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”, and: LEGO Juris A/S v. ...LEGO is demonstrably a famous trademark. This has been confirmed in previous UDRP decisions. See, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-03-07 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Complainant is the owner of the trademark LEGO and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products.
...In reference to bad faith, the Panel notes that all the disputed domain names wholly incorporate the Complainant’s LEGO trademark and that the domain names <lego-onsale.org> and <lego-onsale.net> re-direct to websites in which products similar to LEGO can be found. ...
2011-01-13 - Case Details
D2009-0564; Lego Juris A/S v. Gioacchino Zerbo,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0500; LEGO Juris A/S v. Mike Morgan,
WIPO Case No. ...D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Palmer, WIPO Case D2008-1826; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-02-21 - Case Details
Factual Background
4.1. The Complainant is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Complainant asserts that it is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of toys construction and other LEGO branded products.
5.2. ...
2014-05-02 - Case Details
Factual Background
4.1. The Complainant is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...The Complainant asserts that it is the owner of LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of toys construction and other LEGO branded products.
5.2. ...
2013-04-25 - Case Details
The Complainant commenced use of its LEGO mark in the United States of America in 1953. Over the years, the business of the Lego Group of companies has grown. ...D2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1260 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...
2011-08-01 - Case Details
Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...Previous panels have found the Complainant’s LEGO trademark to be well-known (see in particular LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692, LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2020-11-12 - Case Details
Numerous prior UDRP decisions have confirmed the fame of the LEGO mark. The dominant part of the Disputed Domain Name comprises the word LEGO which is identical to Complainant’s LEGO mark. ...Complainant has not licensed or authorized Respondent to use the LEGO mark, not is Respondent authorized to run a printshop called LEGO Club Printshop nor is commonly known as “the LEGO Club Printshop”. ...
2012-10-12 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. lego-hogwartscastle
Case No. D2011-0884
1. The Parties
Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Billund, Denmark, represented by Melbourne IT Digital Brand Services, Sweden.
Respondent is lego-hogwartscastle, Central Java, Indonesia.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name <lego-hogwartscastle.com> is registered with Melbourne IT Ltd.
3. ...
2011-07-29 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Jamie Fettig
Case No. D2020-0813
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB, Sweden.
...The Complainant owns numerous trademark registrations for LEGO around the world, including:
United States registration no. 4,395,578 for LEGO registered on September 3, 2013;
United States registration no. 1,889,004 for LEGO registered on April 11, 1995;
United States registration no. 1,563,848 for LEGO registered on October 31, 2019;
United States registration no. 1,535,046 for LEGO registered on April 18, 1989;
United States registration no. 2,065,901 for LEGO registered on May 27, 1997;
United States registration no. 1,018,875 for LEGO registered on August 26, 1975;
United States registration no. 3,440,698 for LEGO registered on June 3, 2008;
United States registration no. 2,245,652 for LEGO registered on May 18, 1999;
United States registration no. 1,248,936 for LEGO registered on August 23, 1983; and
United States registration no. 2,189,528 for LEGO registered on September 15, 1998
The Complainant also owns over 500 domain names containing the term LEGO.
...
2020-05-27 - Case Details
Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies or the LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, began using the LEGO Mark in the United States in 1953 to identify construction toys made and sold by them.
...By using the LEGO Mark as a dominant part of the Domain Name, Respondent exploits the goodwill and the image of the LEGO Mark.
...
2013-10-07 - Case Details