Level 5 Corp.,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1692; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1715; LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr,
WIPO Case No. ...On or before the date of the Complaint, the Disputed Domain Name resolved to a substantially Chinese-language website which prominently displayed products under the LEGO Trademark and the Logo. The website narrated the fame and history of the LEGO brand and offered LEGO products in association with a “乐高活动中心 (LEGO education center)” which employs LEGO products as educational tools targeted at children aged 3 to 16. ...
2017-04-10 - Case Details
The growth of the business with sales of LEGO construction toys by the LEGO Group in 2009 was more than USD 2.8 billion.
4.3 The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries.
4.4 The LEGO Group has procured the registration of many variations of the LEGO trademark on a worldwide basis. The LEGO mark is used on products, packaging, displays, advertising, and promotional materials of the LEGO Group. ...
2011-05-24 - Case Details
Factual Background
The following information is derived from the Complainant’s material.
The Complainant is the owner of the trademarks LEGO and LEGO RACERS and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Since 2001 it also has used LEGO RACERS as a trademark for toy racing cars that the LEGO Group markets and for a LEGO RACERS board game. ...
2002-07-09 - Case Details
The Complainant is also the owner of more than 1,000 domain names containing the term “lego”.
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively the “LEGO Group of Companies” or the “LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the United States of America in 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them.
...The business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably over the years. By way of example, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2009, was more than USD 2,8 billion. 2010 was another good year for the LEGO Group. ...
2012-02-20 - Case Details
The Complainant has also shown and adduced in evidence the list of the 2,400 domain names incorporating the LEGO Trademarks. The Panel considers that the Complainant has rights in not only the trademark LEGO but also in numerous other trademarks incorporating the term Lego and other descriptive terms such as “technic” to constitute a family of LEGO Trademarks.
...The Panel finds that the Complainant has rights in the LEGO and LEGO TECHNIC trademarks and that each of the disputed domain names is confusingly similar therewith.
...
2013-04-09 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant submits that it is the owner of the LEGO trademark, and all other trademarks used in connection with the LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. 2010-0840: “LEGO is clearly a well-known mark”, LEGO Juris A/S v. Domain Administrator,
WIPO Case No. 2010-1260: “In the present case, the disputed domain names incorporate the Complainant’s well-known registered trademark LEGO”, and LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-09-09 - Case Details
The LEGO brand is used for related products, such as the very successful Star Wars Lego computer games, which involves characters made out of LEGO bricks re-enacting Star Wars adventures.
...Complainant
The Complainant makes the following contentions:
The Complainant is the owner of a trademark for LEGO, and all other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brands of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...
2011-01-12 - Case Details
Complainant has established that LEGO valid and existing trademark rights in the LEGO mark. The mark has been in use for decades and is well-known. ...Prior UDRP decisions have held that the LEGO mark is well-known. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reginald Hastings Jr.,
WIPO Case No. D2009-0680 ("The LEGO mark is well-known worldwide"); LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2015-06-01 - Case Details
An Bui,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1169; LEGO Juris A/S v. XMGlobal Inc,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1168; LEGO Juris A/S v. J.h.Ryu,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1156; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...D2010-0839; LEGO Juris A/S v. Rampe Purda,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0840; LEGO Juris A/S v. Dealwave,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0881; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2011-08-22 - Case Details
The Complainant observed that the Respondent is currently using a small disclaimer on the website the disputed domain name resolves to, which states: "By closing this window you accept and are aware of these terms !! LEGO, LEGO Mindstorms, LEGO EV3, LEGO Mindstorms EV3, LEGO Mindstorm EV3, and the LEGO logo and MINDSTORMS are trademarks and/or copyrights of the LEGO Group and we in no way represent or are affiliated with LEGO. ...LEGO Juris A/S v. Djoko Sutijoko,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1872 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Mr. Antonio,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-08-18 - Case Details
D2010-2115; LEGO Juris A/S v. Wyntergreen.ca,
WIPO Case No. D2010-2101; LEGO Juris A/S v. lego building co,
WIPO Case No. ...William Stehlin,
WIPO Case No. D2010-2042; LEGO Juris A/S 诉 yanghuitong,
WIPO Case No. D2010-2030; LEGO Juris A/S v. Maho Jakotyc,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0835; LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2013-11-04 - Case Details
The Complainant and its licensees (collectively “the LEGO Group of Companies or the LEGO Group”), through their predecessors, commenced use of the LEGO mark in the U.S. during 1953, to identify construction toys made and sold by them. ...The LEGO trade mark and brand have been recognized as being famous. The LEGO Group has expanded its use of the LEGO trade mark to, inter alia, computer hardware and software, books, videos and computer controlled robotic construction sets. ...
2012-06-21 - Case Details
ARBITRATION
AND
MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Nanda Rizki
Case No. D2022-4491
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB,
Sweden.
...The Complainant has provided evidence that previous UDRP panels have determined the LEGO trademark
(the “LEGO Trademark”) as being well-known or famous. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Level 5 Corp, WIPO Case
No. ...
2023-01-20 - Case Details
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
LEGO Juris A/S v. Manipavitra Yarlagadda
Case No. D2014-0731
1. The Parties
The Complainant is LEGO Juris A/S of Billund, Denmark, represented by CSC Digital Brand Services AB, Sweden.
...Ningbo LEGO Culture Communication Co., Ltd.,
WIPO Case No. D2013-1208, the panel stated: "Respondent's use of the LEGO trademark in a website closely resembling Complainant's LEGO Education website (in the absence of authorization to do so by Complainant) thus establishes Respondent's bad faith in the use of the disputed domain name." ...
2014-07-03 - Case Details
Factual Background
The Panel finds the following matters as fact for the purpose of this decision:
The Complainant, as part of the LEGO Group of companies which manufacture and sell “LEGO” and “LEGO Duplo” plastic construction toys, is the owner of the LEGO and DUPLO trade marks which are both widely in use around the world and, in the case of LEGO, has been since 1954.
...The LEGO trade mark is, and has previously been held to be, a famous or well-known trade mark (e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. ...
2012-08-21 - Case Details
The Complainant has subsidiaries and branches throughout the world, and LEGO products are sold in more than 130 countries, including in the USA.
Moreover, the Complainant is the owner of more than 4,300 domain names containing the term "lego", including for example: <lego-star-wars.net>, <lego-star-wars.org>, <lego-star-wors.de>, <lego-starwars.com>, <lego-starwars.eu>, <lego-starwars.us>, <lego-starwarsshop.com>, <lego-starwars.de> and <lego-starwors.de>. ...D2013-0479; LEGO Juris A/S v. Julius Oconnell,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0108; and LEGO Juris A/S, v. Lego Star Wars Minifigs,
WIPO Case No. ...
2015-10-12 - Case Details
The Domain Names and Registrar
The disputed domain names <לגו .com> (xn--6dbgt.com), <לגולנד .com> (xn--6dbcf0acy.com), <lego‑bricks.biz>, <lego-bricks.net>, <lego‑israel.biz>, <lego-israel.com>, <lego-israel.net>, , and <לגו .net> (xn--6dbgt.net) (the “Domain Names”) are registered with eNom, Inc. ...Decision
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain names <לגו .com> (xn--6dbgt.com), <לגולנד .com> (xn--6dbcf0acy.com), <lego-bricks.biz>, <lego-bricks.net>, <lego-israel.biz>, <lego-israel.com>, <lego-israel.net>, , and <לגו .net> (xn--6dbgt.net) be transferred to the Complainant.
...
2019-12-19 - Case Details
See LEGO Juris A/S v. John Davies,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0160; Lego Juris A/S v. Hu Liang/Dolego,
WIPO Case No. ...D2009-0170; LEGO Juris A/S v. David Palmer,
WIPO Case No. D2008-1826; LEGO Juris A/S v. Michael Longo,
WIPO Case No. ...
2010-05-17 - Case Details
Complainant
The Complainant, based in Denmark, is the owner of the trademark LEGO and several other trademarks used in connection with the famous LEGO brand of construction toys and other LEGO branded products. ...Over the years, the business of making and selling LEGO branded toys has grown remarkably. By way of example, the revenue for the LEGO Group in 2008, was more than USD1,8 billion. ...
2010-01-04 - Case Details
- The Complainant markets and sells products named “LEGO Jurassic World”, “LEGO Santa’s Workshop” and “LEGO Frozen Castle”. The Complainant has a business partnership with Universal Licensing LLC and a license granted by Universal Licensing LLC regarding the “LEGO Jurassic World” products...Each website displayed photographs of the LEGO product described in the relevant domain name, provided information regarding the LEGO product, and displayed advertisements for the LEGO product and links to the Amazon.com website to facilitate online purchases of LEGO products from Amazon.com...
2016-09-07 - Case Details