About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Successful legal actions

Judgments on “patent registry scams”

Attorney General vs. Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry (FIPTR) PDF August 11, 2010 Circuit Court Florida, United States of America (No. 2006-CA-0858) The Attorney General of the State of Florida, filed a lawsuit against an entity called, “FIPTR – Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry Inc.” alleging that the invoices sent to PCT applicants in the State violated the State’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The judgment resulted in USD 2,587,771.29 reimbursement in respect of 1,411 payments by victims of the scam, plus USD 2,116,500 in civil penalties against the defendants. Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Chapter 501, Part II, Florida Statutes
  • Supreme Court of the Czech Republic confirms prison sentence for registry scam
World Intellectual Property Database (WIPD) s.r.oPDF September 17, 2014 Supreme Court, Czech Republic The Court dismissed an appeal by the director of an entity called WIPD – World Intellectual Property Database, s.r.o. against a prison sentence plus fines imposed by the lower criminal courts for a registry scam that sent invoices for trademarks and patents to be included in a database for a fee, while deliberately using a logo closely resembling and liable to be easily confused with the logo of WIPO. Penal Code of the Czech Republic, Section 268 (1) and (3)(a)  

 

https://www3.wipo.int/contact/en/area.jsp?area=patentscope https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/disclaim.html https://www.wipo.int/en/web/privacy-policy/ https://www.wipo.int/en/web/accessibility/ https://www.wipo.int/tools/en/sitemap.html https://www3.wipo.int/newsletters/en/ https://www.wipo.int/podcasts/en/ https://www.wipo.int/news/en/