confusingly similar to at least one and arguably more than one of Complainants’ marks. Focusing on the MY EROS GUIDE mark, Complainants note that the domain...directly with Complainants, as here.” Complainants also contend that the domain name is confusingly similar to the marks EROS, MY EROS, and EROS GUIDE...
2011-04-11 - Case Details
identical or confusingly similar to the trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and (ii) The respondent has no rights or legitimate...interests in respect of the domain name; and (iii) The domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar...
2004-07-14 - Case Details
references to “RapidShare information”. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainants say the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the RAPIDSHARE...of the Policy, to succeed the Complainant must satisfy the Panel that: (i) the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or...
2010-09-16 - Case Details
similarity. There are 15 disputed domain names that do not meet one of the criteria for being confusingly similar (as stated in Kirchhof I ) but these are...still confusingly similar to one of the Complainant’s trademarks because they either contain the distinctive portion of the HOTEL INDIGO trademark ( i.e...
2011-01-18 - Case Details
owner of the CAMPING WORLD Mark and that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar because it incorporates the entirety of Complainant's Mark...Domain Name. Complainant contends that this is not distinctive. Therefore, according to Complainant, the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the...
2015-12-04 - Case Details
Complainant Complainant has alleged that: The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has...rights. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the VAN CLEEF & ARPELS marks because it merely excludes a certain non-essential element of the...
2013-11-14 - Case Details
A. Complainant The Complainant's contentions are equally straightforward and can be summarized as follows: The Domain Name is confusingly similar to...confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (2) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...
2011-07-11 - Case Details
reply to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is...confusingly similar to Complainant’s marks. The domain name is similar in appearance and pronunciation to Complainant’s PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL mark. A�respondent...
2007-01-08 - Case Details
- the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. - the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the...the Complainant must prove the following (Policy, paragraphs 4(a)(i)-(iii): (i) the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a...
2020-12-17 - Case Details
that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its MARLBORO mark; that Respondent lacks any right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain...Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar The Panel finds that Complainant has established its trademark rights for MARLBORO as indicated...
2016-12-09 - Case Details
the Respondent registered the disputed domain name . The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is factually and legally confusingly similar...finds the following: (1) The Panel finds and decides that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks granted to the Complainant...
2011-04-07 - Case Details
Complainant are summarised below: The Domain Name is Confusingly Similar to a Trademark in which the Complainant Has Rights; The Complainant has extensive...exclusive rights in the well-known trademark MISS UNIVERSE. The Domain Name registered and used by the Respondent is confusingly similar to the well-known and...
2010-12-01 - Case Details
(i) The domain name in issue is identical or confusingly similar to the Trade Mark in which the Complainant has rights; and (ii) The Respondent has no...has properly made its case under each requirement. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar This element of the Paragraph 4(a) requirements poses the most...
2003-12-16 - Case Details
Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's common law trademark ROLAND MOURET. The...the “.net” designation. Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark. (b) Rights or...
2009-12-15 - Case Details
domain names at issue are identical or confusingly similar to many of Complainant�s registered trademarks containing or consisting of the words "NATIONAL...this identical or confusingly similar name on his own. The Respondent offered in emails to: 1) transfer the domain names to the Complainant by ideal...
2003-10-17 - Case Details
Complainant The Complainant contends various facts on each of the three elements of the Policy, as follows: - On identical or confusingly similar nature of the...disputed domain name, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its well-known and distinctive...
2023-12-04 - Case Details
Complainant A.1. Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant states that it is the owner of the renowned trademark CINEMARK registered and applied for in...identical to Complainant’s trademark CINEMARK and is therefore confusingly similar thereto. Complainant submits that (i) the initial and central parts of the...
2012-02-07 - Case Details
that Respondent’s use of “SEGAWAY” is confusingly similar to Complainant’s SEGWAY Mark. Respondent’s use of the generic term “hoverboard” does not create...impression than SEGAWAY, so the Disputed Domain Names are not confusingly similar to Complainant’s Mark. Respondent’s Mark, SEGAWAY, has a different commercial...
2016-06-28 - Case Details
funds. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the...identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights, (ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests...
2022-07-12 - Case Details
’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant’s contentions can be summarized as follows: Identical or confusingly similar The Complainant contends that the...Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s BOLLORE trademark. Since the substitution of the letter “o” by the letter “a” does not...
2020-05-05 - Case Details