About Intellectual Property IP Training IP Outreach IP for… IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Industrial Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgements IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Industrial Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making Development Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization Working with WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Industrial Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars World IP Day WIPO Magazine Raising Awareness Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Economics Gender Equality Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Enforcement Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Technical Assistance IP Training Institutions COVID-19 Support National IP Strategies Policy & Legislative Advice Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators WIPO ALERT Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Job Vacancies Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 47367   document(s)s (0.072 sec)

Rows

<<  <  21 - 40  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-1043 for edmundss.com html (19 KB)

Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s EDMUND’s trademark and domain...Similar Complainant relies on previous WIPO UDRP decisions recognizing as “ confusingly similar ” and/or “ virtually identical ” the use of terms that are a...

2006-10-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2006-0887 for lumberliquidater.com, lumberliquidaters.com html (19 KB)

prove each of the following: (i) The domain name at issue is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has...15(a), it is appropriate to apply rules and principles of American trademark law between the parties. A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Paragraph 4(a...

2006-10-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0278 for simonandshuster.com html (13 KB)

disputed domain name is, therefore, confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Respondent is not a licensee of the Complainant. Nor has the...Complainant granted any permission to the Respondent to use the Complainant’s mark or any domain name incorporating it or one confusingly similar to it. The...

2008-04-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0218 for aflacexposed.com html (8 KB)

Insurance.   5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant Complainant alleges that the domain name is confusingly similar to the AFLAC mark, that Respondent has no...Complainant must prove each of the following: (i) the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which...

2007-05-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2016-0779 for olx24-7.com html (11 KB)

’ Contentions A. Complainant Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s...name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s OLX trademark under the Policy. Rights or Legitimate Interests The Complainant submits that the...

2016-06-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2004-0746 for thompsongrassvalley.com html (13 KB)

“thompson” and “grassvalley”, is confusingly similar with their trademarks, the sole difference between the domain name and the “THOMSON” trademark being the...Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.   6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Domain Name The...

2004-11-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-2296 for l-e-g-o.com pdf (144 KB)

consistently rank its brand in the top ten brands in the world. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s registered trademark as it...adopt a confusingly similar domain name. It further submits that the Respondent is not making a bona fide offering of services but rather is using the...

2023-08-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2003-0153 for sportmansguide.com, thesportsmensguide.com html (27 KB)

administrative proceeding on February 26, 2003.   5. Parties� Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the domain names are confusingly similar to...Commission Junction, which prohibited affiliates from adopting domain names which were confusingly similar to trademarks of the licensors, in this case the...

2003-05-28 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-2145 for maxvirilpro.com html (10 KB)

domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The Complainant states that the Respondent is not a reseller or distributor of the...to be successful, the Complainant must prove (i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in...

2014-02-13 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2000-1015 for lockheedmartinsucks.com, lockheedsucks.com html (17 KB)

marks are "confusingly similar" because the marks are contained within the domain names. (b) Respondent has not been commonly known by the domain names...names or that he has engaged in bad faith. (c) The disputed domain names are neither identical nor confusingly similar to Complainant�s trademarks, since...

2001-01-31 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-2084 for barclaydcardus.com html (8 KB)

Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademarks BARCLAY and BARCLAYCARD...to the Complainant’s contentions. 6. Discussion and Findings A. Identical or Confusingly Similar Pursuant to the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i), a...

2012-12-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1207 for buybystolic.com html (17 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar Complainant states that it’s registered trademarks for and including BYSTOLIC, referred to in section 4 above, have been in...the treatment of hypertension for which they are registered. Complainant states that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the...

2011-09-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0355 for agedward.com html (14 KB)

after it registered the domain name, Respondent registered . Complainant contends Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s...prevail in this proceeding, Complainant must establish that: (i) Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark...

2007-05-21 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2023-1785 for securitymaillnstagram.com pdf (233 KB)

building services. 5. Parties’ Contentions A. Complainant The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant ’s trademark. The...” instead of an “i”, is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark. The disputed domain name plainly misappropriates sufficient textual components...

2023-06-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-3839 for jeager-lecoultre.com html (12 KB)

The Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is identical and/or confusingly similar to its JAEGER-LECOULTRE trademark as it incorporates the...name is confusingly similar to its trademark, due to the Respondent misspelling the trademark JAEGER-LECOULTRE by swapping the letter “e” and “a” in the...

2022-01-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-0619 for philipppleinde.com, philipppleinfr.com, philipppleinpascher.net html (12 KB)

the Complainant's contentions: - The Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark. - The Respondent has no rights or...confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of...

2017-05-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2205 for bcbgmaxazriaonlineoutlet.com html (12 KB)

the Complainant's contentions: - The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's Mark. - The Respondent has no rights or legitimate...(i) The Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; (ii) The...

2018-01-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0417 for lexilove.com html (10 KB)

Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark LEXI LOVE, which is...the registered LEXI LOVE mark, which is owned by the Complainant. Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the domain name is confusingly similar to...

2009-05-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1055 for lisaguerrero.com html (12 KB)

5. Parties' Contentions A. Complainant (a) Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to...Accordingly, the Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark. (b) Rights or Legitimate Interests The...

2009-10-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2019-1131 for merc.training, merctraining.net html (11 KB)

are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant argues that it is the oldest...”, which is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark MEIRC as only one letter is missing. The generic term “training” does not eliminate confusion...

2019-07-16 - Case Details