About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

WIPO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Service for .PE

Country / Territory Code

.PE

Country / Territory Name

Peru

Whois Search

Whois Search

Dispute Resolution Policy

Variation of UDRP

Política de solución de controversias en materia de nombres de dominio delegados bajo el ccTLD .PE

Relevant differences between the UDRP and the .PE Policy

Whereas in the UDRP the jurisdiction(s) where the trademark is valid is not considered relevant to panel assessment under the first element, under the procedure for .PE the complainant needs to prove that the domain name in dispute is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark or service mark in Peru

Whereas the UDRP is limited to the protection of trademark rights, under the .PE Policy a complainant may also rely on designations or denominations of origin protected in Peru, names of individuals or famous pseudonyms publicly recognized in Peru, names of official entities of the Central, Regional or Local governments of Peru, and names of private entities registered with the Public Registries in Peru

It is sufficient to prove that either registration or use of the domain name by the registrant is in bad faith, whereas the UDRP requires the complainant to prove both

Courts of Lima, Peru

If an Administrative Panel decides that a domain name registration should be canceled or transferred, the Registry will wait 10 calendar days (as opposed to 10 business days under the UDRP) before implementing that decision

Spanish

Procedural Rules

Reglamento aplicable a la solución de controversias en materia de nombres de dominio delegados bajo el ccTLD .PE (el Reglamento)

WIPO Supplemental Rules

WIPO Model Pleadings

WIPO Model Complaint

WIPO Model Response

Fees

Schedule of Fees

WIPO Experts

WIPO Experts

Domain Registry

http://www.iana.org/root-whois/pe.htm

http://www.punto.pe/

Registration Agreement

Text of Agreement

Eligibility Criteria

.PE domain names are unrestricted, as well as domain names under “.com.pe”, “.org.pe”, “net.pe”, and “.nom.pe”. Restrictions apply to “.gob.pe”, “.mil.pe”, and “.edu.pe”

Supported characters

.PE domain names support ASCII and IDN characters

  • - may have between 3 and 63 characters;
  • - may include letters, numbers and dashes;
  • - may not include dashes as the first or last characters of the domain name;
  • - may include the characters á, é, í, ó, ú, and ñ

Decisions

Decisions


While every effort is made to provide up-to-date information, part of the content of this page comes from third-party sources and may not be accurate at all times.  For any queries about this page or about WIPO’s domain name dispute resolution services more generally, please contact domain.info@wipo.int