About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Issued by the WIPO Appeal Board

Geneva, December 7, 2006
Press Releases PR/2006/469

The WIPO Appeal Board (the "Board") regrets the references in the articles in Le Matin of December 2, 2006, and in 20 Minutes on December 4, 2006, to the confidential deliberations in the case in question. The Board is bound by the confidential nature of its deliberations and therefore is not allowed to reveal details concerning this or other cases. The Board wishes to state that it was neither consulted nor has it given any information to the media.

Those articles, and particularly the one in Le Matin dated December 2, 2006, contained inaccurate information and mischaracterizations, which the Board feels must be corrected.

There was no rape allegation submitted to the Board. The references in the article in Le Matin to the Board's role in this case does not correspond to the facts presented to it. The Board did not deal with any alleged rape.

 

The WIPO Appeal Board

December 7, 2006

 

The WIPO Appeal Board is a key part of WIPO's system of internal justice. It is an administrative advisory body established by the Director General that enables staff to appeal against any administrative decision alleging the non-observance of terms of appointment, any pertinent provisions of the Staff Regulations and Staff Rules or against disciplinary action. The Appeal Board is made up of three members: the Chairman designated by the WIPO Coordination Committee who is not a staff member or former staff member of WIPO; a member designated by the Director General drawn from among the staff of the Organization; and a member elected by staff members of the Organization. This structure ensures the independence of the Board.