The omission of non-essential elements does not render the Domain Name any less confusing for purpose of the confusingly similar analysis. .
(ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name.
...Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Trademark and the first condition of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is satisfied.
...
2013-11-06 - Datos del caso
Complainant
The Complainant makes the following submissions.
Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has registered trademark and common law rights in NETBANK and BANKNET. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy provides that the Complainant must establish that the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to one of the Complainant’s trademarks.
...
2013-10-22 - Datos del caso
The Panel is satisfied that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights. As such, the Complainant has satisfied Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...Rights or Legitimate Interests
As noted above the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to a mark in which the Complainant has rights. The Panel is satisfied that the Respondent is not known, or was ever known, by the name “Airline Network”. ...
2008-04-01 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel concludes, first, that Complainant has sufficiently shown that it has rights in its AMY'S ORCHIDS mark. ...D2001-0094. For analogous reasons, is confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark. This Panel concludes for the foregoing reasons that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant's mark.
...
2009-06-15 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
According to the Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i), the Complainants shall prove that the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainants have rights.
...This conduct is commonly referred to as “typosquatting” and creates a virtually identical and/or confusingly similar mark to the Complainants’ trademarks (Wachovia Corporation v. Peter Carrington,
WIPO Case No. ...
2022-03-02 - Datos del caso
- Use of a privacy service by the Respondent in the circumstances of this Complaint is indicative of bad faith given that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s HMRC mark and the other indicia of bad faith, including that the Domain Name has been used for potentially criminal activity.
...A complainant must prove each of these three elements to succeed.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of the HMRC and HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS registered marks and clearly has rights in those marks, although it is not necessary to consider the latter mark for present purposes.
...
2021-08-30 - Datos del caso
In addition to its registered rights, the Complainant asserts that it also has unregistered rights in the initialism HMRC.
Confusing similarity
The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s well-known HMRC mark in that it only differs by the addition of the dictionary words “reclaim” and “tax”. ...A complainant must prove each of these three elements to succeed.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of the HMRC and HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS registered marks and clearly has rights in those marks, although it is not necessary to consider the latter mark for present purposes.
...
2021-08-24 - Datos del caso
A complainant must prove each of these three elements to succeed.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of the HMRC and HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS registered marks and clearly has rights in those marks, although it is not necessary to consider the latter mark for present purposes.
...Section 1.7 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 goes on to provide “[…] in cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, […] the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of UDRP standing”.
The HMRC mark is incorporated in its entirety within the Domain Name. ...
2021-08-24 - Datos del caso
Complainant
Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark GROUPON, the registration and use of which by Complainant precedes the registration of the disputed domain name.
...Previous UDRP panels have consistently held that a domain name may be identical or confusingly similar to a trademark for purposes of the Policy “when the domain name includes the trade mark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless of the other terms in the domain name” (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ...
2015-06-11 - Datos del caso
Complainant
The Complainant makes the following assertions:
(i) The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights
The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark seeing that it incorporates the Complainant's trademark ACCUTANE in its entirety. ...In the present case, the Panel must decide whether the Complainant has introduced elements of proof, which allow the Panel to conclude that its allegations are true.
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is well established in previous UDRP decisions that, where the disputed domain name incorporates a complainant’s registered trademark, this may be sufficient to establish that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2015-09-07 - Datos del caso
These domain names were registered in 2001, 1997 and 1997 respectively.
The Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to the Complainants’ Marks, as each of them reproduce either the NOVOTEL or SOFITEL Mark in its entirety. ...Other than indicating that the e-mail address was active, the communication does not make any submission on any issue that is relevant to this proceeding and is of no relevance to the Decision.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
To satisfy paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy the Complainants must have trade or service mark rights, and the Domain Names must be identical or confusingly similar to the Complainants’ Marks.
...
2012-03-01 - Datos del caso
Complainant
5.1 The Complainant contends that the Domain Names and are confusingly similar to JIMMY CHOO in which it holds rights for the following reasons:
(i) The Complainant owns many gTLDs and ccTLDs incorporating its trademark. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
6.5 Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, a complainant must prove that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights.
6.6 In line with such provision, the Complainant must prove two limbs, i.e., that it holds the trademark or service mark rights; and that the Domain Names are identical with or confusingly similar to its trademark or service mark. ...
2013-01-07 - Datos del caso
ii) Respondent does not dispute that Domain Name is identical with or confusingly similar to the Mark, except to say that a disclaimer on his website will resolve any confusion as to source.
...Identity or Confusing Similarity
Complainant further contends that the Domain Name is identical with and confusingly similar to the Mark pursuant to the Policy paragraph 4(a)(i).
Respondent has not contested the assertions by Complaint that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Mark, except to say that a disclaimer on his website will resolve any confusion as to source.
...
2005-04-27 - Datos del caso
Complainants contend the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar to their TRACTOR SUPPLY Marks and allege that they are identical or confusingly similar to Complainants' primary domain name . ...D2003-0696 (“incorporating a trademark in its entirety can be sufficient to establish that a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark”). The Panel also finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to Complainants' TRACTOR SUPPLY mark. ...
2009-07-30 - Datos del caso
Administrative panels considering similar cases where registrants simply added a geographical name to a trademark have found such domain names to be confusingly similar. ...D2000-0150 () (transfer ordered where domain name was found to be confusingly similar to complainant's WAL-MART trademark); Cellular One Group v. Paul Brien,
WIPO Case No. ...
2009-12-29 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant contends that it has rights in the LEGO Trademark and that the Disputed Domain Names are confusingly similar thereto.
...Moreover, the Panel finds that the Domain Names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark, since they incorporate Complainant’s Trademark in its entirety with the addition of the words “tie” and “bowtie”, respectively. ...
2013-02-22 - Datos del caso
Complainant
5.1 The Complainant contends that the Domain Names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it holds rights for the following reasons:
(i) the domain name <5fingersshoes.org”> incorporates the character combination “5fingers” which corresponds to the Complainant’s trademark FIVEFINGERS: “5fingers” and FIVEFINGERS are phonetically identical and confusingly similar words. .../Titan Net / NOLDC, Inc,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0808).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
6.7 Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, a complainant must prove that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights.
6.8 In line with such provision, the Complainant must prove two limbs, i.e. it enjoys the trademark right; and the Domain Names are identical with or confusingly similar to its trademark or service mark. ...
2011-02-15 - Datos del caso
The Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks in that the word “mondial” is a prominent word in both of them.
...The Panel found that “The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark Agile Software, since it includes the distinctive part of the mark”.
...
2007-11-09 - Datos del caso
Diana Gomez (NAF Case No. 96950) where
was judged confusingly similar to MOTOROLA for the service and repair of radio
pagers, and Ohio Lottery Commission v. John Barbera (NAF Case No. 96571)
where was judged confusingly similar to OHIO LOTTERY
for lottery tickets and game cards.
The Panel therefore finds that the Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights.
...
2003-06-11 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established that it has registered trademark rights in the mark CHIME. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established that it has registered trademark rights in the mark CHIME. ...
2022-06-10 - Datos del caso