The contested domain name should be regarded as confusingly similar to Complainant’s rights in the trade mark BULGARIAN DREAMS. The two distinctive elements of the contested domain name namely “dream” and “Bulgaria” only differ from Complainant’s mark by the letters “n” in Bulgaria and “s” in Dreams. ...This creates a different impression,
making it uncertain whether the Trademark and the Domain Name are confusingly
similar. Since this is not decisive for the present case, as will be set out
below, the Panel will not elaborate this point.”
...
2006-06-27 - Datos del caso
Respondent
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s
contentions.
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has the burden to show that Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights. ...D2000-0662
(September 19, 2000), a panel first concluded that “a domain name is ‘identical
or confusingly similar to a trademark for purposes of the Policy when the domain
name includes the trademark, or a confusingly similar approximation, regardless
of the other terms in the domain name”. ...
2007-02-16 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has established rights in the SANS mark through registration with the USPTO. ...The Panel finds that the disputed domain name is not distinct and is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark pursuant to Policy Paragraph 4(a)(i). See Oki Data Americas, Inc. v. ...
2007-06-04 - Datos del caso
Respondent’s domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s BENEVOLINK mark.
2. Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the domain name.
3. ...As a result, the Panel finds the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the mark under Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
The Panel concludes that Complainant has satisfied Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i).
...
2007-05-18 - Datos del caso
Complainant
The Complainant alleges that:
The domain name is confusingly similar to the NETELLER and NETELLER.COM trademarks in which the Complainant has rights. The Complainant’s rights precede the Respondent’s registration of .
...Moreover, the addition of the generic top level suffix <.com> does not effect the determination of whether the domain name is confusingly similar to a trademark. Thus the contested domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks.
...
2006-12-21 - Datos del caso
Complainant
Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to its registered trademark, which it has continuously and exclusively used since 1987. ...D2007-0212 (“…it is well-established that [top-level domain suffixes] should not be considered in making [a confusingly similar] determination.”); Busy Body, Inc. v. Fitness Outlet Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2000-0127 (“the addition of the [gTLD] name ‘.com’ is … without legal significance since use of a gTLD is required of domain name registrants”).
...
2011-02-28 - Datos del caso
Respondent argues that its domain name is not confusingly similar to Complainant's marks. Respondent does not contend that she was unaware of Complainant's marks at the time that she registered the domain name at issue.
5. ...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Where a domain name incorporates a complainant's mark in its entirety, the domain name is confusingly similar to the complainant's mark, despite the addition of other words in the domain name and despite the fact that a common word may be appended or a common word inserted therein. ...
2008-11-21 - Datos del caso
See Rules, paragraph 14(b).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has established its rights in the TICKETMASTER mark mark (and the TICKETMASTER.COM mark) by virtue of the evidence of its United States federal trademark registrations.
...Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar because it includes Complainant's entire mark. While the Panel agrees that, as a general matter, a domain name is likely to be found confusingly similar to a mark if it incorporates the mark or a variation of the mark, such a finding is not automatic. ...
2008-12-03 - Datos del caso
See Rules, paragraph 14(b).
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has established its rights in the TICKETMASTER mark (and the TICKETMASTER.COM mark) by virtue of the evidence of its United States federal trademark registrations.
...Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar because it includes Complainant's entire mark. While the Panel agrees that, as a general matter, a domain name is likely to be found confusingly similar to a mark if it incorporates the mark or a variation of the mark, such a finding is not automatic. ...
2008-12-03 - Datos del caso
Parties' Contentions
A. Complainant
(a) Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant contends that the domain names , and are confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark LEGO.
...A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Panel finds that the Complainant has established rights in the LEGO trademark, by virtue of Denmark Registration No. ...
2009-01-29 - Datos del caso
Complainant
Complainant claims that Respondent has registered a domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights. Complainant asserts that because the domain name incorporates the trademark in its entirety and merely adds a generic term "store" it is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark.
...Application of Paragraph 4(a) to the Facts
Identical or Confusingly Similar to Trademark
Complainant is required under Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy to prove that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which Complainant has rights. ...
2001-01-25 - Datos del caso
The Complainant has rights in a trade or service mark, with which Respondent’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar.
There are two requirements that a Complainant must establish under this paragraph; that it has rights in a trade or service mark, and that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the mark.
...Again, in the absence of pleading or evidence, I therefore decline to find that the domain name is confusingly similar to the registered marks.
There is, I think, little question that the Respondent has been an abusive registrant. ...
2001-07-25 - Datos del caso
Discussion and Findings
(i) The Respondent’s domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights.
Having considered the evidence of the Complainant’s rights the Panel finds that all four domain names in dispute are confusingly similar to the cited trade marks and the trading name of the Complainant including the Complainant’s domain name. The Panel is in no doubt that the form of each of the four domain names is confusingly similar both visually and phonetically. All four of the domain names are essentially, as it is put by the Complainant, a common misspelling of the Complainant’s marks.
...
2003-01-08 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant has established registered rights in the mark EQUIFAX, as well as unregistered trade mark
rights deriving from the Complainant’s extensive and longstanding use of that mark.
...Respondent
6. Discussion and Findings
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
B. Rights or Legitimate Interests
C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith
7. Decision...
2022-11-22 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
It is beyond question that Complainant has prior rights in the SANOFI mark and that the Domain Name is
confusingly similar to the SANOFI mark. ...Complainant has proven that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to a trademark in which the
Complainant has established rights according to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy.
...
2023-09-13 - Datos del caso
A. Identical or Confusingly Similar
The Complainant is the owner of the NG BIOTECH trademark as evidenced by its trademark registrations. Based on the evidence submitted, the Panel finds that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark NG BIOTECH. The addition of the letter “s” to the word “tech” represents a misspelling that does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between then Disputed Domain Name and the Complainant’s trademark.
...
2021-05-06 - Datos del caso
D2010-0722 (disputed domain name that adds one letter to the Complainant's mark is confusingly similar because "an unsuspecting consumer would find the disputed domain name visually and phonetically similar and almost identical to the Complainant's mark".); OOM Holding N.V. v. Diamond Point Enterprises Limited,
WIPO Case No. DNL2011-0076 (disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark when the domain name adds only one letter to the trademark and trade name of Complainant); TVS Motor Company Limited v. ...
2016-01-20 - Datos del caso
Complainant
Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its global trademark SYNGENTA. Complainant alleges that the domain name contains its trademark in its entirety. ...The Panel agrees with numerous decisions that hold that a trademark combined with a geographical indicator may render a domain name confusingly similar to the trademark. Complainant cites two UDRP cases decided by prior panels with a similar fact pattern. ...
2017-12-05 - Datos del caso
Complainant
According to the Complainant, the Domain Names are confusingly similar to its trademark VALIUM.
The trademark VALIUM - duly registered since 1961 - is protected in more than 100 countries and is considered as a well-known trademark.
...D2006-0033, “if a domain name incorporates a complainant’s mark in its entirety, it is confusingly similar to that mark despite the addition of other words.”
The Panel concludes that the Domain Names are confusingly similar with the trademark of the Complainant.
...
2011-11-04 - Datos del caso
Complainant
According to the Complainant, the Domain Names are confusingly similar to its trademark XENICAL.
The trademark XENICAL - duly registered since 1993 - is protected in more than 100 countries and is considered as a well-known trademark.
...D2006-0033, “if a domain name incorporates a complainant’s mark in its entirety, it is confusingly similar to that mark despite the addition of other words.”
The Panel concludes that the Domain Names are confusingly similar with the trademark of the Complainant.
...
2011-12-07 - Datos del caso