Sportswear
Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David
Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-01-19 - Datos del caso
Prior
panels have held that bad faith can be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a
well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademarks suggests
opportunistic bad faith (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). Given the strong
reputation and distinctiveness of the Complainant’s trademark, registration in bad faith can be inferred.
...
2023-02-21 - Datos del caso
Nall’'s Silks Sari Centre, WIPO Case No. D2009-0664;
LEGO Juris A/S v. Milon Khan, hongbaocomau, WIPO Case No. D2024-5240.
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2026-01-29 - Datos del caso
Moreover, numerous panels have viewed website suspension by the Registrar or webhost, absent any
explanation or attempted justification by the respondent, as added corroboration of bad faith. See LEGO
Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension
following a takedown request by the complainant); Hershey Entertainment & Resorts Company v. ...
2026-03-12 - Datos del caso
Previous UDRP panels have regularly ruled that bad faith was found where a domain name is so obviously
connected with a well-known trademark that its use by someone, with no connection to the trademark,
suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091 and
Carrefour v. Jean-Claude Bot / Albert Pierre, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-11-09 - Datos del caso
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-05-19 - Datos del caso
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed
domain name could reasonably be claimed in the circumstances of this case (see, e.g., Sportswear
Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd,
David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No.
...
2023-06-23 - Datos del caso
In the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use their
trademarks, the composition of the disputed domain name, and the fact that the disputed domain name
resolves to a website that uses the Complainant’s trademarks and contains PPC links to competing banking
services, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could
reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875;
and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd,
Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-04-29 - Datos del caso
杨智超) Yang Zhi Chao, WIPO Case No.
D2023-3983 and Lego Juris A/S v. Yang Zhi Chao (杨智超), WIPO Case No. D2023-0056. Such use
constitutes evidence of bad faith registration and use as contemplated under paragraph 4(b)(ii) of the Policy.
...
2024-03-11 - Datos del caso
In addition, the Panel finds, similarly to other UDRP panels, that the addition of the gTLD “.online” to the
Disputed Domain Name does not constitute an element as to avoid confusing similarity for the purposes of
the Policy (see, e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. Nguyen Xuan Hau, WIPO Case No. D2023-4439; Philip Morris
Products S.A. v. Маханьков Михаил Владимирович / Makhankov Mikhail, WIPO Case No. ...
2024-03-12 - Datos del caso
The Panel takes this as evidence of Respondent’s bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar
Briouel / Brahim Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension following a takedown
request by Complainant).
...
2024-04-15 - Datos del caso
In
the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no bona fide or
legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed under the circumstances of this
case (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.P.A. v. Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; LEGO Juris A/S
v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO
Case No. ...
2022-07-18 - Datos del caso
Prior
panels have held that bad faith can be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a
well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademarks suggests
opportunistic bad faith (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). Given the
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0320.html
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0113.html
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?...
2022-10-18 - Datos del caso
参见 Mastercard International Inc.诉 Better, Deals; Finestnames.com，WIPO 案件编号
D2009-0702；Dunkin’ Donuts Incorporated and Dunkin’ Donuts USA, Inc.诉 Dazzledesigns，WIPO 案件编
号 D2004-0436；LEGO Juris A/S 诉 bangfei jiang，WIPO 案件编号 D2012-1235。因此，被投诉人曾经将争
议域名用于含有成人内容的网站的这一行为构成恶意，且专家组认为被投诉人的这一行为损害了投诉人商标的
声誉，破坏了投诉人正常的业务活动。
...
2024-01-09 - Datos del caso
Rohan mubbahir Kahn, WIPO Case
No. D2021-1314; LEGO Juris A/S v. John Davis, WIPO Case No. D2018-0313 and Victorinox AG v. Andre
Freitas, Result Capital WIPO Case No. ...
2023-05-04 - Datos del caso
Miami Investment Brokers Inc, WIPO Case No. D2012-1213); LEGO
Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio
Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-05-24 - Datos del caso
The Panel accepts that the Respondent has not acquired trademark or service mark rights, that the Respondent’s use and registration of the disputed domain name was not authorized by the Complainant and that, in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its widely-known trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-05-31 - Datos del caso
Such facts establishes bad faith registration and use pursuant to paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Whois Privacy Services Pty Ltd / Dzone Inc., Yeonju Hong,
WIPO Case No. D2012-2442 (finding that respondent was using the domain name as a parked pay-per-click page and was, thus, intentionally attempting to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation or endorsement of its website).
...
2017-07-05 - Datos del caso
In previous decisions, UDRP panels found that in the absence of any license or permission from the Complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use of the domain name could reasonably be claimed considering Respondent’s use of the disputed domain names(Groupe Auchan v. Gan Yu,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0188; LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-05-25 - Datos del caso
De este modo lo han entendido otros expertos en anteriores decisiones como el caso LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2018-01-08 - Datos del caso