This is a long-standing criterion to assess whether Respondent has right or legitimate interest in the disputed
domain name. (See LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. ...
2022-11-24 - Datos del caso
Prior panels have held that bad faith can be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a
well-known trademark that its very use by someone with no connection to the trademarks suggests
opportunistic bad faith (see LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). Given the strong
reputation of the Complainant’s trademark, registration in bad faith can be inferred in the circumstances of
this case.
...
2022-11-22 - Datos del caso
This is often the case where the domain name resolves to a website consisting of links to products competitive with those of the trademark owner: e.g., Intel Corporation v. The Pentium Group, supra, and Lego Juris A/S v. John Davies,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0160. That is not necessarily a requirement, however. ...
2011-07-15 - Datos del caso
Incorporation of the BELSTAFF mark in the Domain Names in the absence of any rights or legitimate interests and reasonable justification is, to the Panel, sufficient evidence of bad faith by the Respondent under the Policy. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; and Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2012-07-13 - Datos del caso
Therefore, the Complainant states that the Respondent is not using the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.
In addition, the Complainant referred to LEGO Juris A/S v. Probuilders,
WIPO Case No. D2011-0226 and stated that the ELECTROLUX logo is displayed on the website connected to the disputed domain name and this implies a connection between the Respondent and the Complainant.
...
2012-07-10 - Datos del caso
Incorporation of the SWAROVSKI marks in the Domain Name without any reasonable justification is sufficient evidence of bad faith by the Respondent. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494 and Caixa D’Estalvis I Pensions de Barcelona (“La Caixa”) v. ...
2012-07-26 - Datos del caso
It is not necessary that the goods and/or services be identical for passing off to be found. [See, for example, the Lego Lemelstrich case 1983 FSR 155 and others].
6.7 Further, although this is not a case of trade mark infringement either, it is material to have regard to the criteria prescribed by the European Court of Justice in its recent decisions. ...
2000-07-07 - Datos del caso
Previous Panels have held that the registration of a domain name obviously connected with well-known trademarks by someone without any connection to these trademarks suggests opportunistic bad faith. See, among others, LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494.
At the time of initial filing of the Complaint, the Respondent employed a privacy service to hide his identity, which past panels have held serves as further evidence of bad faith registration and use. ...
2016-09-20 - Datos del caso
While this element is not present in the Complainant’s VENTE-PRIVEE and logo trademarks, a gTLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-06-01 - Datos del caso
The Complainant cited, inter alia, the cases of LEGO Juris A/S v. store24hour,
WIPO Case No. D2013-0091, and LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE & CIE, L'ORÉAL v. 10 Selling,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-05-19 - Datos del caso
Dublin) Limited v. Dejan Macesic,
WIPO Case No. D2000-1698; and LEGO Juris A/S v. Andrew Orr,
WIPO Case No. D2015-1311).
The website to which the disputed domain name resolves features advertisements associated with third parties. ...
2016-10-20 - Datos del caso
It has been held in previous UDRP decisions that knowledge of a corresponding mark at the time of the domain name's registration can suggest bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Caixa D'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona ("La Caixa") v. ...
2016-10-12 - Datos del caso
A TLD suffix generally has no capacity to distinguish a domain name from a trademark for the purposes of a comparison under the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2016-12-14 - Datos del caso
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2005/d2005-0740.html
page 6
Panels have previously held that a finding of bad faith can be established where a complainant’s trademark
is shown to be well-known or in wide use at the time of registration of the disputed domain name (see LEGO
Juris A/S v. store24hour, WIPO Case No. D2013-0091). The Respondent must have been fully aware of the
Complainant and the Complainant’s Trademark when it registered the Disputed Domain Name, given the
well-known nature of the Complainant’s brand, evidenced by the various trademark registrations for the
Complainant’s Trademark across the globe that was put into use well before the Respondent registered the
Disputed Domain Name. ...
2024-09-26 - Datos del caso
A gTLD suffix is disregarded in differentiating a domain name from a trade mark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-12-18 - Datos del caso
Bad faith may be found where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark that said use of the domain name by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. See LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains, LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-09-25 - Datos del caso
The Complainants have provided evidence that they own numerous trademark registrations in many jurisdictions long before the disputed domain names were registered and that they have not licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the Complainants’ trademarks (see LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-10-10 - Datos del caso
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues,
Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration
Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico, WIPO Case
No. ...
2023-09-19 - Datos del caso
D2014-1875 (“In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademark, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate use
of the Disputed Domain Name could reasonably be claimed.”); LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David
Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-01-12 - Datos del caso
In the absence of any license or
permission from the Complainant to use its trademarks, no actual or contemplated bona fide or legitimate
use of the disputed domain name could reasonably be claimed (see, e.g., Sportswear Company S.PA. v.
Tang Hong, WIPO Case No. D2014-1875; and LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith,
Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master, WIPO Case No. ...
2023-01-19 - Datos del caso