Ello, aunado al hecho de que el Titular haya registrado nombres de dominio que corresponden a marcas de terceros que amparan aires acondicionados, así como que ha registrado el nombre de dominio , mismo que resuelve al sitio Web de un competidor de la Promovente, permite inferir que el Titular tenía conocimiento del sector de los aires acondicionados en México, y en el balance de las probabilidades de la Promovente y de su marca CLIMAPROYECTOS al momento del registro del nombre de dominio en disputa, lo cual constituye mala fe en el registro del mismo (ver LEGO Juris A/S c. pcmaniabg, Paisiy Aleksandrov,
Caso OMPI No. D2010-1965; Etihad Airways c. Domain Admin, Whois Privacy Corp,
Caso OMPI No. ...
2019-11-06 - Datos del caso
争议域名也包括通用顶级域名后缀“.com”。专家组认为该部分在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果。参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO 案件编号 D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO 案件编号 D2014-0080。
...
2020-09-11 - Datos del caso
诉 Mika Harms, Hackett Shop UK，WIPO 案件编号D2017-2114。关于通用顶级域名，专家组认为该部分在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果。参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611 及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080。...
2018-06-22 - Datos del caso
Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico,
WIPO Case No. D2019-3045; LEGO Juris A/S v. Registration Private, Domains By Proxy, LLC / Carolina Rodrigues, Fundacion Comercio Electronico,
WIPO Case No. ...
2020-03-02 - Datos del caso
However, a TLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison of a domain name with a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. H.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-05-14 - Datos del caso
However, a TLD suffix may generally be disregarded in the comparison of a domain name with a trademark for the purposes of the Policy. See Lego Juris A/S v. Chen Yong,
WIPO Case No. D2009-1611; Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. zhanglei,
WIPO Case No. ...
2018-01-19 - Datos del caso
The Panel cites with approval the posture in cases such as LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2019-01-14 - Datos del caso
The Panel thus infers that Respondent must have been aware of this trademark and its reputation when it registered the disputed domain name, so that the disputed domain name () was registered in bad faith”); LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494; Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains, LLC,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-05-05 - Datos del caso
The Panel
takes this as corroborating evidence of Respondent’s bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Ammar Briouel / Brahim
Mahjoubi, WIPO Case No. D2019-0750 (involving website suspension following a takedown request by
Complainant).
...
2022-09-05 - Datos del caso
UDRP panels have found that a disputed domain name is confusingly similar to a complainant’s trademark where the disputed domain name incorporates the complainant’s trademark in its entirety (e.g., LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-02-18 - Datos del caso
D2014-1875, Sportswear Company S.PA. v. Tang Hong; WIPO Case No. D2010-0138, LEGO Juris A/S v.
DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master).
...
2022-08-11 - Datos del caso
Banijay Group has built many long-running shows, such as Big Brother, MasterChef, Survivor, Lego Masters,
Touche pas à mon Poste, Who wants to be a millionaire or Don’t forget the Lyrics.
The Complainants’ business has 4,650 employees worldwide and their 2023 revenue was EUR 4,318
million.
...
2024-12-13 - Datos del caso
D2021-0774; Compagnie Générale des Etablissements Michelin v. Milen Radumilo,
WIPO Case No. DCO2020-0090; LEGO Juris A/S v. ken Teo,
WIPO Case No. D2020-2380; Sanofi v. WhoisGuard Protected, WhoisGuard, Inc. / Todd Peter,
WIPO Case No. ...
2021-07-01 - Datos del caso
Previous UDRP panels have consistently held that the addition of a descriptive term to a disputed domain name that incorporates a trademark in its entirety typically does not prevent the finding of confusing similarity. See LEGO Juris A/S v. DBA David Inc/ DomainsByProxy.com,
WIPO Case No. D2011-1290.
For all the foregoing reasons, the Panel finds that the first element of paragraph 4(a) of the Policy has therefore been satisfied by the Complainant.
...
2022-01-04 - Datos del caso
The Panel also finds applicable to this case the position on the use of English as the fairest neutral
language, stated by previous UDRP panels under similar scenarios (see LEGO Juris A/S v. Asiagroup,
WIPO Case No. D2022-2829, IPSOS v. Beats, WIPO Case No. D2022-1055).
...
2024-08-16 - Datos del caso
/ Shu Lin, Shu Lin Enterprises Limited,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0566 and LEGO Juris A/S v. Shu Lin/Transure Enterprise Ltd/ Above.com Domain Privacy,
WIPO Case No. D2010-1648).
...
2011-02-01 - Datos del caso
The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name because the Respondent has no trademark rights in or license to use the Complainant's trademarks (citing LEGO Juris A/S v. DomainPark Ltd, David Smith, Above.com Domain Privacy, Transure Enterprise Ltd, Host master,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-12-29 - Datos del caso
Registered and Used in Bad Faith
Previous UDRP panels have found that where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494, Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC.,
WIPO Case No. ...
2014-02-21 - Datos del caso
Previous UDRP panels have found that where a domain name is so obviously connected with a well-known trademark its very use by someone with no connection to the trademark suggests opportunistic bad faith. LEGO Juris A/S v. Reiner Stotte,
WIPO Case No. D2010-0494, Sanofi-Aventis v. Nevis Domains LLC.
WIPO Case No. ...
2013-12-17 - Datos del caso
关于该些字母，专家组认为它们都不具有区别争议域名与投诉人商标的显著效果。关于通用顶级域名后缀，专家组认为在本案中亦不具有任何区别争议域名与投诉人商标的效果（参见LEGO Juris A/S 诉 Chen Yong，WIPO案件编号D2009-1611及Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG 诉 zhanglei，WIPO案件编号D2014-0080）。...
2016-11-14 - Datos del caso