That website offers products branded as "Viagra Oral Jelly", "Viagra Professional", "Viagra Soft Tabs", "Viagra Super Active", which are in product formats in which authentic VIAGRA brand products are not sold and which are not genuine VIAGRA brand products. ...Respondents' website offers products branded as "Viagra Oral Jelly," "Viagra Professional," "Viagra Soft Tabs," "Viagra Super Active," which are in product formats in which authentic VIAGRA brand products are not sold and which are not genuine VIAGRA brand products.
...
2014-12-18 - Case Details
Currently, the disputed domain name resolves to a website, on which under the title, "Buy This Domain", the following "Sponsored Listings" are displayed: "Buy Viagra online", "Viagra 100 mg, "Viagra SIDE Effects", "Purchase Viagra online", "Viagra", "Direct to", and "Buy Viagra Online". ...As to the use of the disputed domain names, the Panel notes that the disputed domain name presently resolves to a website displaying, under the title "Buy This Domain", the following "sponsored listings": "Buy Viagra online", "Viagra 100 mg", "Viagra SIDE Effects", "Purchase Viagra online", "Viagra", and "Direct To". ...
2017-01-13 - Case Details
Respondent is not commonly known by the name "Viagra," "viagraninja.com" or any variation thereof. Accordingly, the Respondent has no trademark rights in the mark VIAGRA
6.9. ...The Respondent's repeated references to a purported VIAGRA product, and products that compete with VIAGRA, confirm the Respondent's awareness of the Complainant's VIAGRA mark. ...
2014-12-18 - Case Details
The Complainant asserts that it owns numerous VIAGRA trademark registrations around the world and that its VIAGRA trademarks enjoy a worldwide reputation through marketing, advertising, and promotion for years. In particular, the Complainant is the owner of numerous trademark registrations for the VIAGRA in more than 150 countries , including U.S Trademark Registration No. 2,162,548 issued June 2, 1998 for VIAGRA for goods/services in classes 6, 18, 44, 46, 51 and 52; and Indonesia Trademark Registration No. 400731 for VIAGRA for goods in Class 5.
...
2015-03-04 - Case Details
The Complainant is the registered owner of the VIAGRA and VIAGRA-formative trade marks in many
jurisdictions including in Taiwan (Province of China). ...TMA506911 for VIAGRA, registered on April 13, 1999; and
- Canadian registration No. TMA1087683 for VIAGRA CONNECT, registered on November 16, 2020;
and
The disputed domain name was registered on July 8, 2023. ...
2023-12-07 - Case Details
VIAGRA-branded medication was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) on March 27, 1998, and the VIAGRA mark has been used on or in connection with the sildenafil citrate products in the U.S. since April 6, 1998.
According to the Complaint, the Complainant is a successor-in-interest to Pfizer’s rights in the VIAGRA trademark including U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,162,548 registered on June 2, 1998. The Complainant, as a successor-in-interest to Pfizer’s rights in the VIAGRA trademark, also has rights in the trademark VIAGRA in more than 150 countries including rights in the Malaysian Trademark Registration No. 97007655 registered on June 11, 1997.
...
2020-08-06 - Case Details
The Complainant contends that the disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant’s VIAGRA trademark in that the disputed Domain Name incorporates entirely the Complainant’s famous and well-known VIAGRA trademark and merely attaches to the VIAGRA mark, the generic terms “girl” and “escort”. ...Clearly, the disputed Domain Name incorporates entirely the Complainant’s VIAGRA trademark. Considering the Complainant’s well-established rights in the famous VIAGRA trademark as recognized in several UDRP decisions including Pfizer Inc. v. ...
2013-09-03 - Case Details
No. 2,162,548, issued June 2, 1998, for the trademark VIAGRA.
The Complainant and its affiliates also own trademark registrations for the VIAGRA mark in more than 150 jurisdictions around the world, including in France (registration No. 95601843) and the European Community (registration No. ...The Complainant argues that the Respondent, on registering the Domain Name <viagra-pfizer-france.com> was seeking to capitalize on the fame of the Complainant’s PFIZER and VIAGRA trademarks.
...
2014-01-16 - Case Details
Complainant attached to the Complaint a copy of its United States trademark registration for VIAGRA with a date of first use of April 6, 1998, and also alleges that Complainant and its affiliates own trademark registrations for the VIAGRA mark in more than 150 countries and that the VIAGRA mark is a coined, famous mark.
...Complainant’s trademark registration attached to the Complaint demonstrates that Complainant has rights in the VIAGRA mark.
The disputed domain name consists of the VIAGRA mark plus the “.online” generic Top-Level Domain. ...
2016-12-05 - Case Details
The Complainant asserts that the Respondent has not licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to
register a domain name incorporating the VIAGRA trademark. The Respondent is also unable to receive any
license or permission from Pfizer, as Pfizer does not have any rights to the VIAGRA trademark any longer.
...Given the distinctiveness and renown of the Complainant’s VIAGRA trademark, it is reasonable to infer that
the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant’s VIAGRA
trademark, and to target the VIAGRA trademark. ...
2024-01-17 - Case Details
The Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. The trademark VIAGRA is a world famous trademark. The Respondent is using the disputed domain name to attract and mislead Internet users searching for information about the Complainant and its VIAGRA product. ...The Complainant has shown that it has registered the trademark VIAGRA in a number of jurisdictions, including Indonesia, where the Respondent is domiciled. The Panel also accepts that VIAGRA is a well-known trademark. ...
2015-02-26 - Case Details
The Complainant is the registered proprietor of the trademark VIAGRA in numerous countries as well as the trademark VGR. The trademark VGR is registered in 6 countries including the US and China. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar
The disputed domain name is made up of the registered trademark VIAGRA, the generic term "stock" and the gTLD ".net". The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the registered trademark VIAGRA.
...
2015-11-03 - Case Details
No. 2,162,548 for the mark VIAGRA, which was issued on June 2, 1998. More recently, the Complainant has developed an intent to use the mark VIAGRA CONNECT, for which it filed an application to register in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on August 15, 2017. ...In this case, the disputed domain name contains the Complainant's trademark VIAGRA in its entirety. The additional word "connect" in this context does not distinguish the disputed domain name from the Complainant's mark. ...
2018-02-14 - Case Details
Respondent has used the URL associated with the disputed domain name to resolve to a website that offers for sale “our quality pills” for “international shipments around the world” under the name “Buy Viagra Singapore”. Medications listed by Respondent include various references to “Viagra” as well as to medications sold by competitors of Complainant. ...Medications listed by Respondent include various references to “Viagra” as well as to medications sold by competitors of Complainant.
Respondent is thus trading on the goodwill of Complainant’s trademarks to attract Internet users, presumably for Respondent’s own commercial gain. ...
2020-12-14 - Case Details
根据投诉人提交的证据，争议域名网站使用了投诉人的商标，包括投诉人的商标VIAGRA和PFIZER。争议域名网站亦使用了页眉 “威而鋼丨藍色小藥丸台灣猛男壯陽官網” 和页脚 “All Rights Reservied.© 2010-2018 台灣威而鋼線上專賣 版權所有”，当中 “威而鋼”是 “VIAGRA” 的中文音译。投诉人有理由相信被投诉人在争议域名网站上主要向中国台湾省市场宣传VIAGRA假冒产品。使用争议域名出售仿冒品不属于权利或合法利益。
综上，本案中无证据表明被投诉人已取得与争议域名有关的任何商标权，或争议域名已被用于善意提供商品或服务。无证据表明被投诉人因争议域名而广为人知。...
2018-08-28 - Case Details
In addition, Internet users (when trying to order the alleged Cialis product) are directed to an online pharmacy where apparently illegal and counterfeit Cialis drugs as well as competitors’ products such as Viagra are sold, possibly also counterfeit.
The Complainant’s trademark registrations date back to as early as 1999 thus long predate the registration of the disputed domain name.
5. ...D2013-0056 (domain name ) where it was affirmed that: “The disputed domain name incorporates the mark VIAGRA and is preceded by the words ‘over the counter’. Patients seeking VIAGRA are likely to assume that the disputed domain name is used for a website to advertise pharmacies where VIAGRA is available ‘over the counter’, that is to say without a doctor’s prescription or even for a website that sells VIAGRA online”.
...
2014-08-11 - Case Details
See to this effect, inter alia, Pfizer, Inc. v. Martin Marketing,
WIPO Case No. D2002-0793; (<viagra-nascar.com>) and Hofmann-La Roche Inc. v. #1 Viagra Propecia Xenical & More Online Pharmacy,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0793 (<viagra-propecia-xenical.com>); see also WhatsApp Inc. v. Private Whois whatsappandroid.com, Private Whois whatsappipad.com and Private Whois whatsappiphone.com,
WIPO Case No. ...
2017-02-06 - Case Details
The website associated with the Domain Name appears to be an online pharmacy calling itself "Lilly Pharmaceuticals", that advertises and purports to sell so-called "generic" and other versions of the Complainant's Cialis product, as well as "generic" versions of Viagra and Levitra brand products and other competing pharmaceutical products for treatment of sexual dysfunction.
5. ...With respect to the issue of bad faith, the Complainant further argues that the Respondent's allegedly "generic" versions of its Cialis product and competing products like Viagra and Levitra are illegal and counterfeit drugs, as there are no approved generic versions of these products, and that the offering of such illegal and counterfeit products is dangerous to the public health. ...
2015-04-22 - Case Details
D2004-0589 that "Furthermore, the printout of the relevant pages of Respondent's website "generic-viagra-online.com" shows that Respondent has been using the Domain Name to promote and sell, for commercial gain, sildenafil citrate pharmaceutical products as "generic Viagra", which directly compete with Complainant's genuine Viagra … This is further evidence of Respondent's bad faith registration and use of the Domain Name under paragraph 4 (c) (iii) of the Policy"...
2017-03-15 - Case Details
According to the aforementioned Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. 1 Viagra Propecia Xenical & More Online Pharmacy,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0793, “the use of sponsor links is not use of the Disputed Domain Name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services.” ...See the aforementioned case of Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. #1 Viagra Propecia Xenical & More Online Pharmacy,
WIPO Case No. D2003-0793. This is likely to lead to confusion about the source or origin of the products offered on Respondent’s site. ...
2013-10-30 - Case Details