About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 897   document(s)s (0.016 sec)

Rows

<<  <  101 - 120  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2005-0658 for amd-processor.net html (15 KB)

Diabetes Home care and DHC services, WIPO Case No. D2001-0174; Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Kil Inja, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409; America Online Inc v. Chris Hoffman, WIPO Case No. ...Thus, the Respondent could not ignore the existence of the Complainant’s trademark at the time of registering the domain name ( see Sony Kabushifi Kaisha also trading as Sony Corporation v. Sin, Eonmok, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007). - The Respondent has not alleged any facts or elements to justify prior rights or legitimate interests in the said domain name...

2005-11-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0649 for travelexnepal.com html (13 KB)

D2000-0666 (finding that the combination of a geographic term with an established trademark does not prevent a domain name from being found confusingly similar); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word...nor the suffix ‘.com' detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY”) and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2010-07-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-1429 for carefoursa.com html (13 KB)

The addition of the generic Top-Level Domain (“gTLD”) suffix in this case “.com” has long been held to be bereft of any distinctive power in determining whether a mark is confusingly similar to a disputed domain name. As stated by the panel in Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409, “neither the addition of an ordinary descriptive word nor the suffix ‘.com’ detracts from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name, namely the trademark SONY”. ...

2015-10-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2002-0101 for myherbalife.com html (7 KB)

The addition of "MY" is not sufficient to avoid confusion. See Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Sin, Eonmok, WIPO Case No. D2000-1007 (November 16, 2000) (finding confusingly similar to SONY); ESPN, Inc. v. ...

2002-04-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1496 for merrilllynchbank.net, wwwmerrilllynchbank.com html (14 KB)

The mere addition of the generic term “bank” to the MERRILL LYNCH mark in the disputed domain names is of no import. Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Kil Inja, WIPO Case D2000-1409 (addition of ordinary descriptive word as prefix or suffix to a world-famous mark such as SONY does not detract from overall impression of the dominant part of the name, the famous mark); America Online, Inc. v. ...

2008-12-15 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0956 for xenicaldiet.com html (16 KB)

Photocom Korea, WIPO Case No. D2000-1338. See also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (“Neither the addition of an ordinary descriptive word...nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, Paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied”). ...

2007-08-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2011-1186 for clubmonacoonline.com html (14 KB)

Hochberger, WIPO Case No. D2006-1050, while the second case is Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409. 5.3 The Complainant further contends that the Respondent is incapable of demonstrating any rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. ...D2006-1050, in which the panel held that the domain name was confusingly similar to the complainant’s MASTERCARD trademark regardless of the addition of the generic word “offers”. The Panel also finds the case Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. Inja Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409, relevant in this regard in which the domain names , , and were all found to be identical and confusingly similar to the SONY trademark. 6.5 Accordingly, the Panel finds that the Complainant has established the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to the Complainant’s CLUB MONACO trademark. ...

2011-09-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1775 for revloncoupons.org html (14 KB)

D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name contains the identical mark of the complainant combined with a generic word or term); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2010-12-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1312 for energizerrechargeablebatteries.com html (14 KB)

D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name in dispute contains the identical mark of the complainant combined with a generic word or term); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word...nor the suffix ‘.com' detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY”) and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2009-11-10 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1593 for sheshansofitel.com html (15 KB)

D2011-1042 (finding the addition of the geographic term “Beverly Hills” to Complainant’s MONTAGE trademark created a domain name that was confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2012-10-09 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision DCO2012-0038 for delta.co html (14 KB)

DCO2012-001 (holding that the ".co" country code is not to be taken into consideration when examining the identity or similarity between the complainant's trademark and the domain name). see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2013-01-03 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2012-1832 for lego668.com html (14 KB)

D2011-1042 (finding the addition of the geographic term “Beverly Hills” to Complainant’s MONTAGE trademark created a domain name that was confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2012-11-16 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1831 for stuartweitzman-5050.com html (15 KB)

D2011-1042 (finding the addition of the geographic term "Beverly Hills" to Complainant's MONTAGE trademark created a domain name that was confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that "[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix ".com" detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY" and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2014-12-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0664 for swarovskioutletsalez.com html (15 KB)

D2011-1042 (finding the addition of the geographic term “Beverly Hills” to Complainant’s MONTAGE trademark created a domain name that was confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2013-07-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2013-0643 for myswarovskisale.com html (16 KB)

D2011-1042 (finding the addition of the geographic term “Beverly Hills” to Complainant’s MONTAGE trademark created a domain name that was confusingly similar to Complainant’s trademark); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2013-07-02 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2015-0381 for marlboroclones.com html (14 KB)

The addition of the generic Top-Level Domian (“gTLD”) suffix in this case “.com” has long been held to be bereft of any distinctive power in determining whether a mark is confusingly similar to a disputed domain name. As stated by the panel in Sony Kabuskuki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation), WIPO Case No. D2000-1409, “neither the addition of an ordinary descriptive word nor the suffix “.com” detracts from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name, namely the trademark SONY”. ...

2015-05-12 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2021-0700 for playsteition.com html (14 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. v. 力菲道 Case No. D2021-0700 1. The Parties 1.1 The Complainant is Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., Japan, represented by Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C., United States of America (“United States” or “US”). 1.2 The Respondent is 力菲道, China. 2. ...Factual Background 4.1 The Complainant is part of the well known Sony electronics and media group. In 1994 it introduced the “PlayStation” gaming platform. It is one of the most successful gaming platforms in the world, having sold over 400 million units since its introduction. ...

2021-04-27 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1410 for sapquickaccess.com html (15 KB)

D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name contains the identical mark of the complainant combined with a descriptive word or dictionary term); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix “.com” detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2017-09-22 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-2084 for apex-vapors.com html (15 KB)

D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name contains the identical mark of the complainant combined with a generic word or term); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2018-01-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2017-1033 for stevemaddensneakers.com html (15 KB)

D2001-0026 (finding confusing similarity where the domain name contains the identical mark of the complainant combined with a generic word or term); see also, Sony Kabushiki Kaisha (also trading as Sony Corporation) v. Inja, Kil, WIPO Case No. D2000-1409 (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word […] nor the suffix ‘.com’ detract from the overall impression of the dominant part of the name in each case, namely the trademark SONY” and thus Policy, paragraph 4(a)(i) is satisfied). ...

2017-07-24 - Case Details