About Intellectual Property IP Training Respect for IP IP Outreach IP for... IP and... IP in... Patent & Technology Information Trademark Information Design Information Geographical Indication Information Plant Variety Information (UPOV) IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments IP Resources IP Reports Patent Protection Trademark Protection Design Protection Geographical Indication Protection Plant Variety Protection (UPOV) IP Dispute Resolution IP Office Business Solutions Paying for IP Services Negotiation & Decision-Making IP Cooperation Innovation Support Public-Private Partnerships The Organization WIPO and Artificial Intelligence Working at WIPO Accountability Patents Trademarks Designs Geographical Indications Copyright Trade Secrets Future of IP WIPO Academy Workshops & Seminars IP Enforcement WIPO ALERT Raising Awareness World IP Day WIPO Magazine Case Studies & Success Stories IP News WIPO Awards Business Women Universities Indigenous Peoples Judiciaries Youth Examiners Innovation Ecosystems Economics Finance Intangible Assets Global Health Climate Change Competition Policy Sustainable Development Goals Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions Frontier Technologies Mobile Applications Sports Tourism Music Fashion PATENTSCOPE Patent Analytics International Patent Classification ARDI – Research for Innovation ASPI – Specialized Patent Information Global Brand Database Madrid Monitor Article 6ter Express Database Nice Classification Vienna Classification Global Design Database International Designs Bulletin Hague Express Database Locarno Classification Lisbon Express Database Global Brand Database for GIs PLUTO Plant Variety Database GENIE Database WIPO-Administered Treaties WIPO Lex - IP Laws, Treaties & Judgments WIPO Standards IP Statistics WIPO Pearl (Terminology) WIPO Publications Country IP Profiles WIPO Knowledge Center World Intangible Investment Highlights WIPO Technology Trends Global Innovation Index World Intellectual Property Report PCT – The International Patent System ePCT Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System Madrid – The International Trademark System eMadrid Article 6ter (armorial bearings, flags, state emblems) Hague – The International Design System eHague Lisbon – The International System of Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications eLisbon UPOV PRISMA Mediation Arbitration Expert Determination Domain Name Disputes Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE) Digital Access Service (DAS) WIPO Pay Current Account at WIPO WIPO Assemblies Standing Committees Calendar of Meetings WIPO Webcast WIPO Official Documents Development Agenda Tailored Initiatives & Projects Collaborative Forums & Dialogues Innovation, Creativity and Development Acceleration Program IP for Impact National IP Strategies Cooperation Hub Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISC) Technology Transfer Inventor Assistance Program IP Commercialization WIPO GREEN WIPO's Pat-INFORMED Accessible Books Consortium WIPO for Creators Member States Observers Director General Activities by Unit External Offices Global Forum on IP and AI AI Infrastructure Interchange AI Tools & Services Staff Positions Affiliated Personnel Positions Procurement Results & Budget Financial Reporting Oversight

Full Text Search on WIPO Panel Decisions

Found 44   document(s)s (0.032 sec)

Rows

1 - 20  >  >>

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-1596 for microgaming-casinos.org html (15 KB)

D2007-0013; Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Sting Marketing Inc., Sting Marketing, WIPO Case No. D2008-0869; Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. ...Nikola Zugic, WIPO Case No. D2009-0855; and Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Hosting Hosting, WIPO Case No. D2009-1423. In Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. ...

2010-12-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0854 for microgamingsbest.com html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Fox Poker Tour Case No. D2009-0854 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...It further contends that the inclusion of the generic word “best” in the disputed domain name does not add distinctive matter so as to distinguish it from the Complainant's MICROGAMING trademarks. The combination of the word “MICROGAMING” with the word “best” therefore creates a domain name that cannot be anything but confusingly similar to the Complainant's well-known MICROGAMING trademarks. ...

2009-08-26 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0855 for mymicrogamingcasinos.com html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Nikola Zugic Case No. D2009-0855 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The disputed domain name incorporates fully the Complainant's MICROGAMING tademark, together with the words “my” and “casinos”. The distinctive part of the domain name is “Microgaming”, the Complainant's trademark. ...

2009-08-24 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0893 for fortuneloungemicrogaming.com html (17 KB)

Further, in at least six previous decisions under the Policy, panels have found that Complainant has rights to the MICROGAMING Trademark. Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Telecom Tech Corp., WIPO Case No. D2008-0894; Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. ...WhoisGuard, WIPO Case No. D2008-0613; Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Stefan Molleman, WIPO Case No. D2008-0157; and Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. ...

2008-09-17 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2014-1322 for usonlinecasinosmicrogaming.com html (20 KB)

The Complainant is the exclusive licensee of a number of registered trademarks consisting of the word MICROGAMING (the “MICROGAMING trademark”) in various jurisdictions throughout the world including: - The word trademark MICROGAMING, registered in Australia on July 22, 2002 with registration No. 920607 for goods and services in International Classes 9,35 and 41; - The word trademark MICROGAMING, registered in Canada on November 2, 2004 with registration No. ...The use of the dominant element “microgaming” along with such generic and descriptive words makes the disputed domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant’s well-known MICROGAMING trademark. ...

2014-09-30 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0261 for microgamingcasino.asia html (29 KB)

The Complainant is the exclusive licensee of a number of pending and registered trademarks consisting of or incorporating the word MICROGAMING (“the MICROGAMING trademark”) in various jurisdictions including the United States of America, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada and Australia, the proprietor of which is Microgaming Systems Anstalt. ...The Complainant provides online casino software and management systems under the MICROGAMING trademark. Under the terms of the exclusive licence agreement, all benefits arising out of the use of the MICROGAMING trademark by the Complainant inure to the Licensor. ...

2009-05-14 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-0853 for microgamingcasinossite.com, microgamingcasinossites.com html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Dave Green Case No. D2009-0853 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...In conclusion, the disputed domain names are, if not identical, at least confusingly similar to the trademark MICROGAMING, of which the Complainant is an exclusive licensee. B. Rights or Legitimate Interests “Microgaming” is not a descriptive term, in which the Respondent might have a legitimate interest. ...

2009-09-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1423 for microgaming-casinos-list.com html (24 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Hosting Hosting Case No. D2009-1423 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of the Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc. of Johannesburg, South Africa. ...In addition, the Complainant contends that the Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's “www.microgaming.com” website. (iv) That the combination of the word “microgaming” with the words “casinos” and “list” creates a domain name that is confusingly similar to the Complainant's well-known MICROGAMING trade mark. ...

2010-01-29 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2007-0013 for microgamingcasinos.com html (15 KB)

  WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center   ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. E Net Marketing Ltd. Case No. D2007-0013   1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited, MGS House, Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...The Complainant is also the exclusive licensee of a number of pending and registered trademarks consisting of or incorporating the word MICROGAMING (thereinafter the MICROGAMING trademarks) in various jurisdictions including the United States of America, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada and Australia. ...

2007-03-07 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0870 for bonusmicrogamingslots.com html (16 KB)

The Disputed Domain Name wholly incorporates the Complainant’s trade mark MICROGAMING with the addition of the word “bonus” before the trade mark MICROGAMING and the word “slots” after the trade mark MICROGAMING. ...Therefore, in the Panel’s view, the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s MICROGAMING trade mark. For the foregoing reasons, the Panel is satisfied that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s MICROGAMING trade mark. ...

2008-08-11 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-1918 for microgaming.mobi html (21 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Jumbo Domains Case No. D2008-1918 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited, of Douglas, Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...The Complainant considers the disputed domain name incorporates the Complainant's MICROGAMING trademark in its entirety, without the addition or subtraction of any elements of the Complainant's well-known MICROGAMING trademark. ...

2009-02-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0894 for riverbellemicrogaming.com html (18 KB)

  WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center   ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Telecom Tech Corp. Case No. D2008-0894   1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited, Isle of man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...The websites of these online casinos collectively receive in excess of 3 million visitors each month. The Complainant asserts that the MICROGAMING trade marks are very well-known in relation to online casinos and gaming related software. The Complainant asserts that the Disputed Domain Name wholly incorporates the Complainant’s trade mark MICROGAMING. ...

2008-08-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0265 for microgamingclub.com html (16 KB)

The Complainant answered on May 3, 2010, providing a partial copy of an exclusive Licence Agreement between Microgaming Systems Anstalt and Microgaming Software Systems Limited. The Respondent did not submit any response to this additional submission. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar Annexes C and D to the Complaint demonstrates registrations of the MICROGAMING trademark since 1999 made by Microgaming Systems Anstalt. The Complainant`s rights on the asserted trademark were demonstrated with the providing of a partial copy of a contract where all marks accompanying the Microgaming Systems Anstalt`s proprietary software suite - used to run and administer online casinos - were exclusively licensed to the Complainant. ...

2010-06-01 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2018-0790 for mcirogaming.com, micorgaming.com, micorgamingsupport.com, microgaimng.com, microgaimngsupport.com, microgamign.com, microgamignsupport.com, microgamnig.com, microgmaingsupport.com html (15 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Franco Lippi Case No. D2018-0790 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of Douglas, Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("United Kingdom"), represented by D. ...The Complainant is the exclusive licensee of a number of registered trademarks featuring the word "microgaming" (the "MICROGAMING Mark"), each of which is registered to Liechtenstein entity Neosoft Anstalt. ...

2018-06-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0869 for casinos-microgaming.com html (15 KB)

  WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center   ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Sting Marketing Inc., Sting Marketing Case No. D2008-0869   1. ...As already stated the Panel is prepared to accept the Complainant’s assertions that it is the exclusive licensee for the word mark MICROGAMING. The Panel also accepts the Complainant’s assertion that the Complainant is not affiliated with the Respondent and has never licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the MICROGAMING trade marks. ...

2008-08-08 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0613 for 7microgaming.com html (16 KB)

  WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center   ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. WhoisGuard Case No. D2008-0613 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited, Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan John & Kernick Inc., Johannesburg, South Africa. ...As already stated the Panel is prepared to accept the Complainant’s assertions that it is the exclusive licensee for the word mark MICROGAMING. The Panel also accepts the Complainant’s assertion that the Complainant is not affiliated with the Respondent and has never licensed or otherwise permitted the Respondent to use the MICROGAMING trade marks. ...

2008-07-18 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2008-0157 for mobilemicrogaming.com html (16 KB)

  WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center   ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Stefan Molleman Case No. D2008-0157   1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited, Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...The Complainant is the exclusive licensee of a number of pending or registered trademarks (the proprietor of which is Microgaming Systems Anstalt of Vaduz, Liechtenstein) in various jurisdictions worldwide consisting of or including the word MICROGAMING, inter alia, a service mark for MICROGAMING with an additional stylized letter “M” in the United States of America, registration no. 3,006,898, first used in commerce on December 21, 1996, and Community Trademark no. 002789063 MICROGAMING with a priority of July 25, 2002, both in international classes 9, 35 and 41 (the “MICROGAMING Marks”). ...

2008-04-04 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1406 for microgamingblackjack.com html (12 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Louis Fabiano Case No. D2009-1406 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of Douglas, Isle of Man, Crown Dependency of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...It is most likely that the Respondent was fully aware of the Complainant's MICROGAMING trademark rights and its reputation in the gaming and casino industry when registering the disputed domain name...

2009-12-23 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2009-1299 for highrollermicrogaming.com html (13 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Ekremyikilmaz Case No. D2009-1299 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of Isle of Man, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...Identical or Confusingly Similar The Complainant has several trademarks registrations for MICROGAMING in several countries and in Europe. Therefore, it has been proved that the Complainant has rights in the MICROGAMING trademark. ...

2009-11-20 - Case Details

WIPO Domain Name Decision D2010-0266 for freemicrogamingslots.com html (11 KB)

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Microgaming Software Systems Limited v. Dopici Nasrat/PrivacyProtect.org Case No. D2010-0266 1. The Parties The Complainant is Microgaming Software Systems Limited of Douglas, Isle of Man, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Bowman Gilfillan Inc., South Africa. ...Complainant The Complainant alleges that it is the exclusive licensee of a number of registered trade marks consisting of or incorporating the term MICROGAMING in various jurisdictions around the world. The mark covers computer software for games of chance and casino style gambling. ...

2010-05-12 - Case Details