The Respondent is Sharon Rhodes, Scott Ties, United States of America (“United States”).
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with NameCheap, Inc. ...- The disputed domain name carries a high risk of implied affiliation with the Complainant which cannot
be considered a fair use of the disputed domain name...
2022-11-28 - Case Details
In relation to the registration and use of the domain name by the respondent, complainant also establishes the following:
- The respondent registered a domain name identical to several of complainant's trademarks and to its name...- it has held trademark rights in the term "GONVARRI" since 1979, i.e. long before the date the domain name in conflict was created.
- its presence on the web under the "GONVARRI.COM" domain name dates from July 1, 1997, a date considerably earlier than that of the creation of the domain name in conflict.
...
2000-09-06 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...It also continued to win a further 22 industry awards, a list of which is exhibited to the Complaint.
4.1.8. On March 20, 2007 the first disputed domain name (“Domain Name 1”) was registered and the Complainant used that domain name for both its website and as its email address up to late February 2010. ...
2010-08-05 - Case Details
Luis Tobena, an individual whose address is Argenter 15, in Barcelona, Barcelona, España, 088003.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The domain name under dispute is "serpadres.net" (the "Domain Name").
The registrar of the domain name under dispute is Network Solutions, Inc. ...That the Respondent has registered a domain name incorporating a trademark that was both famous and distinctive at the time the domain name was registered. ...
2000-10-18 - Case Details
The Respondent is jordane takapi, jordane takapi, Cameroon.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Wix.com Ltd. ...The disputed domain name
was registered on May 31, 2025. Registering the disputed domain name so obviously connected to a well-
known mark without authorization is itself evidence of bad faith. ...
2026-01-06 - Case Details
The Domain Name and Registrar
2.1 The domain name upon which this complaint is based is (the "Domain Name").
2.2 The registrar of the domain name as at the date of the Complaint is Tucows, Inc., based in Canada ("Tucows").
3. ...Tucows responded to the Center’s request by email on July 12, 2001, verifying (1) that Tucows was the Registrar for the Domain Name, (2) that the Respondent was the current registrant of the Domain Name, and (3) that the Domain Name had a ‘hold’ status, to ensure that no changes occur to the ownership or the Registrar for the duration of the dispute. ...
2001-09-05 - Case Details
The first and immediately striking element in the Domain Name is the Complainants' name and adoption of it in the Domain Name is inherently likely to lead some people to believe that the Complainants are connected with it. ...Decision
The Panel decides, in accordance with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, Paragraph 4a and 4b,
- that the Domain Name in dispute is confusingly similar to the registered trade and service marks of the Complainants;
- that the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name; and
- that the Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
...
2000-08-16 - Case Details
The Respondent is MK Sound of Los Angeles, California, USA, represented by the Law Offices of Jonathan P. Chodos, USA.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with Network Solutions, LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...- July 24, 1995: MK Inc registered the Disputed Domain Name (it used the website at the Disputed Domain Name to sell its products from 1995 until 2007)....
2013-08-14 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hottinger and Cie Groupe Financiere Hottinguer SA / Jardinier Joel, Hottinger and Cie de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, represented by Cabinet Santarelli, France.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name< banquehottinguer.com> is registered with EuroDNS S.A. ...The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2014-10-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Zoran Ristic, Serbia.
2. The Domain Name, Registry and Registrar
The Registry of the disputed domain name is the European Registry for Internet Domains
(“EURid” or the “Registry”). ...Discussion and Findings
Under Paragraph B(11)(d)(1) of the ADR Rules the Complainant is required to demonstrate the following:
(i) that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a name in respect of which a right is
recognized or established by national law of a Member State and/or European Union law; and either
(ii) that the disputed domain name has been registered by the Respondent without rights or legitimate
interests in the name; or
(iii) that the disputed domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith
Paragraph B(11)(b) of the ADR Rules, stating that the sole remedies available pursuant to an ADR
proceeding where the Respondent is the domain name holder in respect of which domain name the
complaint was initiated shall be limited to revocation or to the transfer of the domain name to the
Complainant provided that it satisfies the eligibility criteria established for the registration of .eu domain
names.
...
2023-02-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois ID Theft Protection, Cayman Islands, United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Rebel.com
Services Corp.
3. ...The Complainant has also pointed out that the Respondent is a known domain name squatter who has registered numerous domain names which incorporate famous trademarks of third parties or slight variations on famous trademarks, as is evidenced by and reported in the WIPO Domain Name Decision No. 2006-0659 concerning the domain name . ...
2007-01-18 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...Identical or Confusingly Similar
In cases where a domain name incorporates the entirety of a trademark, or where at least a dominant feature of the relevant mark is recognizable in the domain name, the domain name will normally be considered confusingly similar to that mark for purposes of the Policy. ...
2018-09-26 - Case Details
The Respondent is Hirofumi Nishioka of Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Dynadot, LLC.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2012-08-08 - Case Details
The Respondent is Domains by Proxy, Inc. of Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America and Direction Software Ltd of Auckland, New Zealand.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with GoDaddy.com, Inc.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2010-11-02 - Case Details
The Respondent is WHOISGUARD Protected, WHOISGuard Inc. of Panama / Pascal Pengs of New York, New York, U.S.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name ("Domain Name") is registered with Enom, Inc. d/b/a enom.com (the "Registrar").
3. ...Based on the above, the Center then verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy" or "UDRP"), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules"), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Supplemental Rules").
...
2016-01-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Erica, Zhang Da Yan of Xiamen, China / YinSi BaoHu Yi KaiQi (Hidden by Whois Privacy Protection Service) of Beijing, China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with HiChina Zhicheng Technology Ltd. ...(2) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Respondent is not using the disputed domain name in respect of a bona fide offering of goods or services. ...
2016-05-23 - Case Details
The Respondent is can wang, Wu Chen of Hefei, Anhui, the People's Republic of China.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with HiChina Zhicheng Technology Ltd.
3. ...The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...
2010-07-08 - Case Details
The Center verified that the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
...To the contrary, none of the disputed domain names has been used; and each of the disputed domain names, with the exception of the disputed domain name , has been offered for sale on the Sedo or Unregistry domain brokerage websites at the price of USD 5,999 per disputed domain name, and at USD 1,000 in the case of the disputed domain name .
...
2018-07-20 - Case Details
The Respondent is Makar Davidov, Cyprus.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Spaceship, Inc. ...The entirety of the OLG mark is reproduced within the disputed domain name. Accordingly, the disputed
domain name is confusingly similar to the mark for the purposes of the Policy. ...
2026-06-25 - Case Details
The Respondent is Whois Privacy, Private by Design, LLC, United States of America / minh pham Cardinal, Canada.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with Porkbun LLC (the “Registrar”).
3. ...The Complainant emphasizes that the website associated with the disputed domain name lacks any disclaimers that would dispel the confusion regarding the disputed domain name and the associated website.
...
2021-07-15 - Case Details